500-fold Increase in Data Flow from SETI Telescope 346
coondoggie brings us an article from Networkworld about a flood of new data for the SETI@home project. We discussed something similar a few months ago when a new telescope array went live. The vast amount of processing power required to handle the new data is prompting the SETI@home team to make a plea for more volunteers. Quoting the press release:
"What triggered the new flow of data was the addition of seven new receivers at Arecibo, which now let the telescope record radio signals from seven regions of the sky simultaneously instead of just one. With greater sensitivity and the ability to detect the polarization of the radio signals, plus 40 times more frequency coverage, Arecibo is set to survey the sky for new radio sources."
FoldingAtHome (Score:5, Insightful)
Left seti when they went to bonic (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:FoldingAtHome (Score:5, Insightful)
So what are you doing here, wasting your important CPU cycles?
Re:Not trying hard to keep what they had... (Score:3, Insightful)
are the cycles really "spare" (Score:5, Insightful)
Parent is wrong (Score:5, Insightful)
Just because you think you know what people should do, doesn't mean you do.
oh I dunno (Score:5, Insightful)
Which is silly. The goal of life is maximize overall satisfaction, not accomplish one single highest goal. It's important to rank your priorities, of course, both as an individual and as a society. But the notion that because A is "more important" than B implies ipso facto that A should get all the resources and B should get none is maximally silly.
Indeed, it's kind of OCD obsessive to always be focussed on pursuing the Top Goal, the kind of thing that when we see people doing it in practise -- giving up everything, including enough sleep and good nutrition, to, say, play World of Warcraft and become the biggest baddest player -- we conclude they need to do some growing up.
How wasteful is SETI? (Score:5, Insightful)
But how is contributing to a project that was the basis for mainstreamed distributed computing any more wasteful than blowing 9 hours a night on WoW? I'd love to see a breakdown of the increased energy usage from a high-end CPU and a good video card vs. a PC that's on anyway and running BOINC when it's idle.
Screaming "carbon footprint!!" about something as trivial as BOINC is the real waste. Here, I've swapped 80% of the lights in my house for CFL's, and I burned 10 bucks worth of electricity last month (with an electric heater and 4x computers in the house no less!) does make me green enough to spare some processor cycles now?
Re:FoldingAtHome (Score:5, Insightful)
Find a protein, you change many lives for the better.
Find ET, and you change the course of the human race forever.
I will choose what to do with my extra CPU cycles myself, thank you very much. To me, ET is more interesting.
(Yes, I should know, it was my computer that discovered the candidate object for SETI@home back in 2004. Got on TV and weekly reader for that. What have YOU done with your spare CPU cycles?)
My only regret is BOINIC runs so crappy and is so hard to manage (come on, install a program that crashes upon resume, gotta dig out the right profile, gotta figure out how to sign up for projects = fail).
Fucking ignorant (Score:3, Insightful)
Of all the things in the world that monumental amounts of energy are 'wasted' on each day (powering bin Ladens dialysis machine,lighting the creationism museum,all the power used by all the dictators and oppressors of the world who shouldn't be allowed to LIVE let alone use resources), 'wasting' a few of them LOOKING FOR FUCKING EXTRATERRESTRIAL LIFE doesn't even come CLOSE to being classified as a 'waste'. FUCK! Am I at the wrong site?!!
Re:Is SETI even needed? (Score:2, Insightful)
I agree with you about Prime95 though.
Re:FoldingAtHome (Score:1, Insightful)
Find ET, and you change the course of the human race forever.
This is a bias and gambling fallacy. You have $10 bucks. You can buy dinner, or try and win 1 million dollars at the pocker machines. 1 million dollars can change your life, but you'll not get 1 million dollars, you'll just waste $10 and cheat yourself out of dinner.
SETI is listening for possible radio signals coming from the nearby galaxies to Earth. When I say "nearby", that's million of light years away.
It means if SETI finds something, it'll be millions of years old, and it'll take another few million years until the ETI sees our answer. You'll not change course of humanity. You may likely die in 40-50 years from something that Folding@Home could have helped cure, though.
Re:FoldingAtHome (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:come on, people! (Score:3, Insightful)
What seems to be overlooked about SETI (Score:3, Insightful)
I would note that there is no fundamental reason for this axiomatic proposition, and it makes much more sense simply go with the data rather than stubbornly cling to a belief for which there is so far not a shred of evidence -- much as the creationists do with regard to geology and archaelogy, I would note.
Maybe sometimes some evidence will appear for ET life. That will be interesting, if so. In the meantime, we have a rapidly growing contrarian body of evidence, so we should accept as our tentative conclusion that we are, in fact, the only life in the universe.
Re:FoldingAtHome (Score:3, Insightful)
Yes, but spending your spare cycles on protein folding will actually accomplish something.
Re:How wasteful is SETI? (Score:1, Insightful)
Re:Parent is right. (Score:3, Insightful)
Benefit of SETI (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:FoldingAtHome (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:come on, people! (Score:3, Insightful)
All the evidence says that us being alone in the universe is next to impossible.
Aliens won't use radios... (Score:2, Insightful)
I hope people realise (Score:3, Insightful)
I hope that people realise that by covering 7 regions of the sky instead of one, and 40 times as much spectrum bandwidth as before, assuming that aliens are as likely to emit on any of these frequencies (which after all is not such a bad assumption considered we don't know a thing about them), statistically that will make us discover alien signals 280 times faster than before.
Very basically, that means that if we were say 1,000 years from finding an alien signal with the previous setup (which you can't say sounded so unlikely, I mean we barely listened for 40 years, and not always with the means we have now), we are now 3 years and a half away from that instead.
Folding at Home Costs me a Job (Score:2, Insightful)
This structural biologist offers the following insight. I looked
over the papers published by the FOLDING@Home guys and I didn't
see a lot of medically important results. Actually it looks like
the computational equivalent of naval gazing. I wonder why
the authors don't just get dirty and use crystallography
and/or NMR to solve their structural questions. I looked at their
recent paper trail, no (ok 1) Science/Nature papers...
I guarantee that if SETI@home finds a signal in the static the
authors will get the cover of science/nature (and a trip to Sweden).
Maybe beyond:
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0118884/ [imdb.com]
Save my job -- don't do FOLDING@Home
---537