Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
Science Technology

Ion-Mask Coating Could Make Waterproofing Electronics Easy 99

Posted by ScuttleMonkey
from the spray-on-foan-rubber dept.
Engadget is reporting that a new chemical coating, originally designed to repel toxic vapors and liquids from soldiers' uniforms, may be the solution to small waterproof electronics. "The Ion-Mask is a special invisible coating that is chemically bonded to the device and repels water. It should allow waterproofing to make it into devices that are too small for the seals that are usually used to do the trick. Devices can have joins and gaps coated for a general level of water repellence, or have individual components treated for even more protection."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Ion-Mask Coating Could Make Waterproofing Electronics Easy

Comments Filter:
  • quite useful (Score:5, Interesting)

    by pwnies (1034518) * <j@jjcm.org> on Monday December 31, 2007 @06:08PM (#21870356) Homepage Journal
    Considering that I just sent my iPod through a ride in the washing machine, this could be quite useful. Not only for waterproofing, but also for cleaning electronics. Sure you can send your keyboard through the dishwasher, but you still have to let it dry for quite a while. It'd be a nice way to clean more intricate electronics as well.
  • by illegibledotorg (1123239) on Monday December 31, 2007 @06:10PM (#21870366)
    I guess this could be nice in the "small device" application that they mention, but other bigger devices come to mind:

    - Ever ruin a laptop by spilling soda on it? It might still be sticky, but you wouldn't fry the motherboard.
    - Ever tried waterproofing an outdoor AP or camera? You have to be very aggressive -- this could make things easier.

    It would be great if this stuff came to market like a Rustoleum-type spray.
  • by G4from128k (686170) on Monday December 31, 2007 @06:20PM (#21870426)
    Although this coating may make something waterproof, I'd doubt that it makes the device surfactant-resistant. Soapy water (in the shower, tub, sink, or washing machine) does not have the high surface tension or tendency to be repelled by hydrophobic substances that I'd bet this coating depends on.

    Of course, I could be wrong and would enjoy an informative post that proves that this coating can survive suds.
  • by blankinthefill (665181) <blachanc@gma i l . com> on Monday December 31, 2007 @06:34PM (#21870540) Journal
    I thought of this too, but it brings up some important things to consider first: 1. Will the treatment inhibit heat transfer? Does it even stand up under heat? The article was pretty vague on that point, but if the answer to the first one is yes, or the second one is no, then that would limit its functionality greatly when expanding it to uses outside those mentioned in the article, namely phones. 2. Cost. How much does it cost to do this? and, more importantly, would there be a way to do it yourself, or to bring something in somewhere and get it done for you? If the is prohibitive, then it also lowers the usefulness, but if its cheap, easy to use, and you don't have to have a contract with them to get it done... this could end up being a pretty nice addition to ANY portable electronics.
  • Re:quite useful (Score:2, Interesting)

    by oggiejnr (999258) on Monday December 31, 2007 @09:05PM (#21871312)
    As far as I am aware the cheap ones simply act as connection changers and allow for keyboard manufacturers to create PS2/USB keyboards with only one connection on the end. The keyboard has to decide to what port it is connected and uses the appropriate protocol. The expensive ones actually change the protocol between USB and PS2 so the device doesn't have to be USB aware.
  • by Penguin Follower (576525) <TuxTheBurninator ... m ['gma' in gap]> on Tuesday January 01, 2008 @07:02AM (#21873294) Journal
    I just want to know when I can use this to water proof my PC for water cooling! :D

Time sharing: The use of many people by the computer.

Working...