Voyager 2 Shows Solar System Is "Dented" 173
Selikoff writes "NASA's Voyager 2 spacecraft has found that our solar system is not round but is 'dented' by the local interstellar magnetic field, space experts said on Monday. The data were gathered by the craft on its 30-year journey when it crossed into a region called the 'termination shock.' The data showed that the southern hemisphere of the solar system's heliosphere is being pushed in. Voyager 2 is the second spacecraft to enter this region of the solar system, behind Voyager 1, which reached the northern region of the heliosheath in December 2004."
Re:I don't get it (Score:5, Informative)
The density is very low. The body of the spacecraft might get hit by individual molecules which have that temperature, but what are a few thousand molecules going to do to it?
Re:I don't get it (Score:4, Informative)
Re:Shape? (Score:4, Informative)
Basically the suns solar winds push back interstellar matter. This can have a shape.
Re:Is this any better than conjecture? (Score:5, Informative)
FTA:
"Voyager 2 entered the termination shock almost 1 billion miles closer within the southern hemisphere of the heliosphere of the solar system than Voyager 1 previously had," said Voyager Project scientist Edward Stone of the California Institute of Technology.
Re:Is this any better than conjecture? (Score:5, Informative)
Actually, they seem to base their conclusion not only on that fact, but also because they had theorized that it might be that way from computer models that predicted when Voyager 1 and Voyager 2 reached the termination. So far Voyager 1 (actually, not sure on V1) and Voyager 2 reached the termination shock around where they thought they would according to the model that the Solar System is asymmetrical as described in TFA. (This [www.cbc.ca]arcicle briefly mentions the computer model)
Re:Halp! (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Its not really hostile (Score:5, Informative)
Actually, the "cold" of space doesn't help at all. Because the density of particles is so low, spacecraft can't cool down by convection. Cooling spacecraft (eg shedding internally generated heat) is a big problem. Also, the main "harsh" ingredient of space is radiation. The technology used in spacecraft is usually way behind commercial technology because it also has to be "rad-hardened."
Re:I just find it amazin (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Shape? (Score:4, Informative)
Almost 12 light-hours, actually (Score:5, Informative)
isn't much (Score:3, Informative)
It doesn't damage the spacecraft because, as anyone who has put out a candle flame with his fingers can tell you, it's not temperature that is dangerous but heat. Things with very little heat to transfer -- in this case, some unbelievably tiny amount of matter -- but at very high temperature, are harmless.
An analogous situation exists with respect to electricity: it isn't voltage per se that is dangerous to you but rather charge. Things that are at very high voltages (e.g. the static charge you built up when you scuff your shoes on a dry winter day) can be quite harmless if the amount of charge that can be transferred is very small, e.g. just a little spark.
The confusion exists in part because usually things at high temperature (or high voltage) have plenty of heat (or charge) to transfer, and then they are more dangerous than equivalent reservoirs at lower temperature (or voltage), because they transfer the lethal dose of heat (or charge) much faster.
Re:human defined? (Score:3, Informative)
Asking if there is something that exists that is not defined by humans is a tricky question. All of these things "exist", but all the tools we have for sensing them and measuring them are largely based on human-defined systems of measurements. We can't talk about these things without resorting to standards of measurement, which are wholly arbitrary and based on human experience.
So, yes, there are lots of things that exist that are not human defined. However, once we name it or measure it or look at it or smell it or hear it or touch it, we are ascribing human-created standards to it so we can describe it to other people. It is these standards of measurement which are defined by humans, not the things themselves.
</philosophy>