The Universe Damaged By Observation? 521
ScentCone writes "The Telegraph covers a New Scientist report about two US cosmologists who suggest that, a la Schrodinger's possibly unhappy cat, the act of observing certain facets of our universe may have shortened its life . From the article: 'Prof Krauss says that the measurement of the light from supernovae in 1998, which provided evidence of dark energy, may have reset the decay of the void to zero — back to a point when the likelihood of its surviving was falling rapidly.'"
Crap, crap, crap (Score:5, Informative)
Waveform collapse applies to quantum probabilities, not passive long-distance observations. They occur because an observer influences an observation; interfering with that which is observed is the only way one can observe it on the scales in which quantum phenomena occur. When observing the light of stars, no information is being sent back to the source; and the idea that consciousness somehow magically induces waveform collapse has all but died, favoring instead theories of quantum decoherence and the indroduction of new 'thermal' states during the observation process as the trigger for waveform collapse.
My only hope is that they've cooked up this idea simply to show how silly the idea of consciousness-triggered waveform collapse is; much like Schrodinger created the cat thought experiment to demonstrate what he saw as a flaw of the Copenhagen interpretation of superposition.
Re:Already Proposed (Score:1, Informative)
This is some of the worst science reporting ever! (Score:3, Informative)
We need to reign in these rogue astronomers, stat!! LOL
Re:Life imitates Douglas Adams (Score:2, Informative)
Re:consciousness does not... (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Quarantine by Greg Egan (Score:2, Informative)
Re:On first glance... (Score:2, Informative)
Re:On first glance... (Score:2, Informative)