Whose Laws Apply On the ISS? 344
Hugh Pickens writes "Whose laws apply if astronauts from different countries get into a fight, make a patentable discovery, or damage equipment belonging to another country while on the International Space Station? According to the Outer Space Treaty of 1967, ratified by 98 nations, states have legal jurisdiction within spacecraft registered to them. When the space station was assembled from modules supplied by the United States, Russia, Japan and the European Space Agency (ESA), partners rejected an initial proposal that US law should prevail throughout the space station. "It was agreed that each state registers its own separate elements, which means that you now have a piece of the US annexed to a piece of Europe annexed to a piece of Japan in outer space, legally speaking," said Dr Frans von der Dunk of the International Institute of Air and Space Law at the University of Leiden. So what happens if a crime is committed in space? "If somebody performs an activity which may be considered criminal, it is in the first instance his own country which is able to exercise jurisdiction," Dr. von der Dunk added."
crime? what about birth? (Score:5, Interesting)
Ok, unlikely, but would it not rock?
US Law is a bad idea (Score:1, Interesting)
four places at once (Score:5, Interesting)
Interesting Questions (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:War of the Roses in space? (Score:1, Interesting)
well its *called* (Score:3, Interesting)
So I guess U.S. laws would apply since its obviously a NASA project...
Oh wait, that would be in U.S. news sources... and in press releases from a U.S. space agency...
Re:Who pays for the station? (Score:3, Interesting)
Illegal region-free DVD player aboard the ISS (Score:5, Interesting)
The ISS has an illegal modded "region-free" DVD player, purchased by NASA and shipped up in 2001.
Properly, the ISS should have a Region 8 player. Those are for aircraft, cruise ships, and "international venues". Airlines have to buy Region 8 players and discs for in-flight entertainment. Why isn't the MPAA pursuing this? It sets a bad example.
Astronauts tend to be military (Score:1, Interesting)
These agreementds basically say that military personel of the Sending country who commit crimes within the Host country will be held subject to the Sender's military law. So if a US austronaut screws up in a Russian module, he will be Court Martialed under US Military Law and not subject to Russian Law.
IANAL (IAALS), this is not legal advise, if you go to jail because of it, it's not my fault.
more interesting, who's ethics committee? (Score:5, Interesting)
"a piece of Europe"? (Score:1, Interesting)
Which specific country is it that has a little piece floating in space?
My guess is France, because the French are pushy about issues of nationality and sovereignty, and the rockets will have been launched from their bases.
Europe? (Score:3, Interesting)
Ok, anybody besides me that see an obvious question regarding this: which European states law apply in ESA's sections? There is no "Europe" when it comes to laws - each country have their own.
So which is it? English? French? German? Dutch? Italian? Spanish? Or another European law?
no "European" jurisdiction (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Crimes in space (Score:5, Interesting)
Actually this is a popular misconception. A few hundred kilometres up the acceleration due to gravity is not much different than here on the Earth's surface. The difference is that the ISS is in freefall you you get apparent weightlessness - effectively all the objects are in the same orbit around the Earth and since orbital velocity is independent of mass it gives an impression of weightlessness. So actually an astronaut still weighs more than a duck in space but is unaware of this because they are in the same orbit. For true weightlessness you have to go a long, long way away.
Sorry that was probably more physics than you wanted to know but this is Slashdot!