Is a Laser Data Link 1.5 Million Kilometers Feasible? 304
An anonymous reader writes "On the Canary Islands last week, a team from Oerlikon Space demonstrated the feasibility of a laser link across a distance of 1.5 million kilometers for the first time ever. In the future, laser links like this one will be able to transmit data across huge distances through the universe far more rapidly and efficiently than is possible using conventional radio links today."
Never saw this coming (Score:5, Interesting)
In all seriousness, the problem is not the knowledge a laser can travel that far; its whether you can create precise enough targeting equipment.
A radio signal might be more of a splatter, but at least if you point it "over there" with enough power behind it, it will get there.
As they say their simple hilltop to hilltop test failed because of weather conditions, whats going to happen when they do put 'scopes at the lagrange points?
"Oh sorry, we can't get the data today because its cloudy"
Back onto the radio front, we have Voyager 1 which is 15 billion miles away, proven with radio, that would seem good enough for me.
A bit exaggerated? (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:Question about lasers (Score:2, Interesting)
So, the farther away you go, the bigger the "dot" the beam casts is. The inverse square law applies. If it didn't, overall power would have been added as the beam travels (the dot would be bigger, but the same brightness). This is a law of physics.
I'd imagine you'd kinda have to aim carefully, but by the time it could 1.5 billion miles the beam would be, at least, hundreds of miles across. Which means you better have a sensitive photo detector, just as you would need sensitive antennae with radio waves.
But having to aim is the point (PUN), really. Concentrating the beam reduces the energy needed to get it there, because the energy is spread out over a smaller area.
It's pretty damn cold up there (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:Never saw this coming (Score:5, Interesting)
Huh? The logical thing do to would be have the laser communicators in orbit, and the communication from ground to the laser satellites would be via the conventional means. If its cloudy in your town, then the satellite can talk to another town which isn't cloudy and you can use fiber to talk the rest of the way.
Re:Targeting that is going to be a bitch. (Score:5, Interesting)
Instead, I imagine the initial linkup might be the limiting step. The system might require an initially higher-power signal (that is broad so that targeting tolerances are lower) to initialize the link, then active feedback could allow the two ends to narrow the beams for lower-energy high-speed data transfer. Maybe the initial phase will use conventional radio signals (or radar) to establish the locations (and relative movement) of the two endpoints of the link. With that information, the two ends can then aim the laser fairly accurately.
Lagrange points (Score:5, Interesting)
I've been thinking about the Earth/Sun Lagrange points lately. I think they might be an excellent location to test an Earth/Mars transit vehicle. ESL5 is far enough away to be out of Earth's magnetosphere, so it will experience the raw radiation environment. It would be able to remain in position for long periods of time. The only hitch I can see is it may not be easy to get to/from. I can't seem to find any data. If we put a test platform with a "lifeboat" craft there, how quickly could the craft get back here. Is it days away? weeks away? Anybody know?
Laser moon and back feet, more like *miles* (Score:5, Interesting)
However, the beam size from a collimated laser is a couple miles across at the moon. Typically, receiving a signal back takes a large telescope which counts single-digit photon returns from a Nd:YAG q-switched laser. It's been almost 2 decades since I worked with the stuff (you might search for Satellite Laser Ranging, Goddard Optical Research Facility and MOBLAS or TLRS) and the units that ranged on the moon cubes were at Mt. Haleakala in Hawaii.
It was neat stuff, but I remember one of the PIs saying the spot on the moon was the size of Georgetown (a section of Washington DC), though I can't remember exactly now. The outgoing laser was about 4" in diameter.
a better test would have (Score:3, Interesting)
Probably already in use. (Score:4, Interesting)
Re:Never saw this coming (Score:3, Interesting)
Unlike radio stations, most point to point links (for example, satellite uplinks) use a focus beam. That's what the big dish is for. The tighter the beam, the less area your transmitted power is spread over and the greater your received signal strength. The downside, of course, is that a tighter beam has to be aimed that much more accurately. As a point of reference, most geosynchronous satellites are spaced about 2 degrees apart, which requires a terresterial pointing accuracy of about 1 or 2 degrees. On the other hand, the Arecibo radio telescope has a beam width of a few thousands of a degree.
A laser naturally comes out with a narrow beamwidth, while a radio signal takes a little more work. But the beam width of both can be manipulated to where you need them to be, and the issues of signal strength versus pointing accuracy are identical in both cases.
Friis Transmission Formula (Score:3, Interesting)
Radio to Laser to Radio (Score:2, Interesting)
- Use radio from the ground to orbit? I think this is pretty common already. Lasers as we know suffer more from weather than radio.
- Use laser from Earth orbit to furthest possible point without a significant signal loss.
- And then, use radio from that point on?
Imagine you're trying to send a signal from a clear area, through a forest, to another clear area. Laser wouldn't work through the forest, but radio would.
I also think that laser would require more power than radio, making it more feasible to have laser power outside of Earth orbit, then using radio for further away.
What do you think?