Justice Department's Bio-terror Mistake 477
destinyland writes "University professor and artist Steve Kurtz publicizes the history of chemical weapons with performance art pieces. The day his wife died of a heart attack, 911 responders mistook his scientific equipment for bioterrorism supplies. After he was detained for 22 hours, Homeland Security cordoned off his block, and a search was performed on his house in hazmat suits, they found nothing. Now they're prosecuting him for "mail fraud" for the way he obtained $256 of harmless bacteria."
Re:Terror is winning (Score:2, Informative)
This is one of over a hundred such cases.
Hale to the Fatherland.
Sue
This story is very very very very very very old. (Score:5, Informative)
Re:This story is very very very very very very old (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Terror is winning (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Terror is winning (Score:4, Informative)
Re:Terror is winning (Score:0, Informative)
Re:how did he commit fraud? (Score:5, Informative)
The fraud claim wasn't about the contents of the package - instead, it was based on how the order was placed. According to an article on AlterNet, "The $256 Question" [alternet.org] :
I think that's an accurate description from Kurtz's point of view, since I found the Alternet article via a link on the Critical Art Ensemble Defense Fund's press release page [caedefensefund.org].
So yeah, seems like there was mail fraud, but in a technically-correct-but-really-lame sense of "fraud" that reeks of desperation to pin something - anything - on Kurtz.
Re:Terror is winning (Score:5, Informative)
Dickhead (Score:4, Informative)
And shit for brains.
Do you wonder why Americans and the "free world" are threatened with terrorist activity? I mean it obviously couldn't have anything to do with how you select arbitrary groups of people around the world, demonize them to make it appear moraly okay to rob them, persecute, terrorise them and kill them to further your interests?
Could it be that so many of your most vocal and prominant figures are so obviously either corrupt or stupid? Or the fact that you insist on challenging other nations for their transgressions with regard to international law and being the world's police force while your own agencies completely disregard the rule of law, as this case highlights?
No, it's probably because every one else is jealous of your freedom.
Big fucking rant here, but I am so sick of seeing absolute shit like that re-inforcing propaganda on a site that is supposed to be a bit more intelligent than the usual fare. Terrorist manuals are avaliable in many languages. Copies of the SAS handbook, anarchist cookbook, etc are out there and they are not in arabic.
I personally feel safer about Iran having a nuclear program than I do about the US having one. How many wars have Iran started in the last 50 years? How about the United States? In those wars, which nation has used WMDs? Which nation has supplied more WMDs to other nations to fight proxy wars? Which nation has taken a decade to go from cooperation to war with at least two former allies?
Sure, Iran has threatened Isreal, but Isreal is a state born from terrorism with a total lack of regard for international law. It is a state that continues to commit human rights abuses on the population it has displaced through the theft of land. It has developed nuclear weapons, refused to sign the NNPT and given it's total disregard for the humanity of any nation around it, and the fact that Iran supports the Palestinian people, I think it is much more likely that Isreal will be the agressor in any nuclear exchange in the middle East. I support Irans nuclear program if for no other reason than to keep Isreal in check.
Your own government commits human rights abuses and supports foreign governments that commit human rights abuses. The most extreme abuses are of course reserved for non citizens, but I believe in the rule of law and a crime is a crime. Please fuck off with your propaganda, it insults my intelligence. And don't come back with that fucking US centric democrat voting liberal shit. I don't understand your political divisions and I don't want to. My opinions are my opinions, this post is predominantly fact.
Sincerest apologies to any intelligent americans who can see through the propaganda but feel insulted by the strong language in this rant.
Help 'em out (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Terror is winning (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Dickhead (Score:3, Informative)
While you have many points in your post I can agree with, the suggestion that Iran is a suitable nation for nuclear weapons is ridiculous. His abuses of human rights within Iran, especially with regards to women, prove that that administration would be willing to do things to other nations that even America wouldn't consider.
And how many wars has Iran started in the last 50 years? Since there's no point in considering anything before the Iranian revolution, we can just go with 1979 onwards. They couldn't start a whole lot of wars considering they were at war with Iraq from 1980 until 1988 (Which Iraq started), leaving their military and country in a fairly weak state for many years after that. They have, however, said they want to take Israel off the map. And you think that they should have nukes to keep Israel in check? It's bad enough that Israel has nuclear weapons, the last thing we need is for two countries in the region to have them. The solution to nuclear proliferation isn't more nuclear proliferation!
Re:Terror is winning (Score:5, Informative)
Yasser Esam Hamdi
Kevin James
Were born in the US, and are just a few of the US Citizens in Gitmo [cageprisoners.com]
I'm not saying any of these men are innocent -- just that they deserve due process under the law like any other citizen, regardless their religion or hairstyle.
Re:Terror is winning (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Terror is winning (Score:4, Informative)
And leave you there. From Wikipedia: "Since the Afghanistan war 775 detainees who have been brought to Guantanamo, approximately 420 have been released. As of August 09, 2007, approximately 355 detainees remained at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. More than a fifth have been cleared for release but may have to wait months or years for their freedom because U.S. officials are finding it increasingly difficult to line up places to send them, according to Bush administration officials and defense lawyers. Of the roughly 355 still incarcerated, U.S. officials said they intend to eventually put 60 to 80 on trial and free the rest."
Re:Terror is winning (Score:3, Informative)
You do recognize that under your logic (or lack there of), every German officer, soldier and spy picked up during WWII, could not be held, without first being read their rights, shipped to the US, and then having before a Judge and been convicted of fighting in the German army.
When you consider to hold the trial, we would obviously had to ship back US, British or French fighters to testify (and thus hurt our war effort) and you also consider that the capture happened in a war zone where defense lawyers could argue that destruction of evidence prevents a fair trial; well, then you would recognize how illogical your comment and the views that produced it are.
You should be aware that your argument lacks any Constitutional foundation. The Constitution states very clearly the Judicial branch doesn't deal in foreign matters or things that happen outside the US. The Constitution puts that power largely in the Executive and to some extent the Legislative branches, but clearly says the Judical has no power in this area.
Re:Terror is winning (Score:4, Informative)