MIT's SAT Math Error 280
theodp writes "The Wall Street Journal reports that for years now, MIT wasn't properly calculating the average freshmen SAT scores (reg.) used to determine U.S. News & World Report's influential annual rankings. In response to an inquiry made by The Tech regarding the school's recent drop in the rankings, MIT revealed that in past years it had excluded the test scores of foreign students as well as those who fared better on the ACT than the SAT, both violations of the U.S. News rules. MIT's reported first-quartile SAT verbal and math scores for the 2006 incoming class totaled 1380, a drop of 50 points from 2005."
Perhaps they should offer a Quality Assurance majr (Score:5, Funny)
Re:If I could do it all over again... (Score:5, Funny)
Re:1220 in 1989 (Score:5, Funny)
What it really meant was they were sitting at the same table!
Those whacky MIT Kids... (Score:5, Funny)
Just watch out when one of them attains the CEO position at your company.
"Hey, you know what would be a really hilarious number for our stock prices to hit?"
Uh oh.
Well there's your problem... (Score:5, Funny)
I don't normally put a lot of stock in standardized test scores, but with a total score of 1380 for an entire class, I can see how that might be a problem.
Re:1220 in 1989 (Score:5, Funny)
Let me guess, the verbal section accounted for much of the discrepancy?
Re:is that a word? (Score:5, Funny)
Don't worry, you're not in it.
Re:Fast times at MIT.. (Score:1, Funny)
Re:1220 in 1989 (Score:3, Funny)
I pity the fool.
Re:If I could do it all over again... (Score:3, Funny)
Re:not just a chuckle story (Score:2, Funny)
Re:If I could do it all over again... (Score:3, Funny)
Don't be a fool. Wrap your tool.
Re:If I could do it all over again... (Score:5, Funny)
A six figure income, no dress code, full benefits, three assistants, and a 32 hour work week??