Brain Implants Relieve Alzheimer's Damage 143
Genetically engineered cells implanted in mice have cleared away toxic plaques associated with Alzheimer's disease. The animals were sickened with a human gene that caused them to develop, at an accelerated rate, the disease that robs millions of elderly people of their memories. After receiving the doctored cells, the brain-muddling plaques melted away. If this works in humans, old age could be a much happier time of life.
Horrifying for whom? (Score:1, Interesting)
I'd think that a stroke or other direct physical impediment must be far more frustrating for the actual sufferer.
Increasing Alzheimers is mostly a result of keeping people alive longer. No matter how age care progresses, there will always be a weakest link. The designed lifetime of the human body is being exceeded. Perhaps we should allow people to die earlier with dignity.
A couple big questions though... (Score:5, Interesting)
Whether this accomplishment (and it is a pretty cool accomplishment) will be meaningful for people is very uncertain. First of all, Alzheimer's is not a positive diagnosis, that is you diagnose it by the absence of other explanations for observed behavior. So you don't actually have a way of confirming that the mental defects of a patient are *really* due to a-beta deposits. Unlike many diseases, we can't (yet) test blood or tissue or do imaging studies to confirm a-beta deposits (though there is tons of effort being spent on developing such tests). So you'd have to decide to do a pretty serious procedure on (generally) elderly people in less than ideal health on the basis of a flimsy diagnosis. It might well be worth it, but it is a big question.
Moreover, though, we don't really know what causes the neurodegeneration associated with amyloid diseases. We know that deposits or a-beta or tau tangles (or light-chain or huntingtin, or SOD or transthyretin [wikipedia.org] (which was the topic of my thesis work) or whatever amyloidogenic protein you like) correlate well with neurodegeneration. But whether those are the cause or not is still a very open question. In fact there is plenty of research around that suggests that amyloid deposits themselves are not damaging, but the precursors in the aggregation pathway are the real culprits. Some have even suggested that amyloid is a more or less inert structure that can be used to segregate potentially dangerously unstable proteins away from the rest of the cell.
So, supposing this treatment does everything perfectly, chops up a-beta and disintegrates plaques, *and* we can deliver it to correctly diagnosed patients, we still might not even be hitting the right target.
Not to be too down on this topic, but we are still quite a long way from a treatment, much less a cure.
-Ted
Is there any way I can help? (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:What I want to know is.. (Score:3, Interesting)
It sounds pretty good but I am afraid it will not cure the disease. Permanent damage and the tissue/functionality lost are not restored, so I am afraid we would still need stem cells for a proper AD cure.
Removing amyloid. (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Removing amyloid. (Score:3, Interesting)
I'm not afraid of death. I have been dead for billions of years before I was born.
A bit off topic, but I wanted to respond to this. Think about it. Before you existed, there were billions of years of nothing. And presumably, after you die, another eternity of nothing. So basically the world looks like this:
Nothing... Nothing... Nothing... flyingfsck exists... Nothing... Nothing... Nothing.
Notice that "flyingfsck" is special in this scenario -- he (she?) is the one who comes into being, and then dies. I ask you, what the heck is so special about YOU? Why is it YOU who flashes into existence for a brief few years and then disappears?
The answer is, there's nothing special at all about you. Which means the whole idea that your existence was preceded by "nothingness" and followed by "nothingless" must be inherently flawed. Just something to think about.