Human Origins Theory Tested By Recent Findings 272
annamadrigal writes "The BBC news is reporting on findings presented in Nature which suggest that Homo Erectus and H. Habilis were in fact sister species which co-existed. This challenges the view that the upright humans evolved from the tool users."
We do science right! (Score:5, Informative)
Next, both species walked very much erect. The primary difference between them is the skull and brain.
The BBC got it right. there's no reason the submitter, or Slashdot, should not have gotten it right, too.
As to the science, the wisest words in TFA come from Professor Spoor (snicker):
Of course, that assumes the new skull really is H. erectus, which is dubious. Maybe it was an H. erectus ancestor, small like H. habilis but with an H. erectus-like brain.
Why yes, I do have a degree in physical anthropology. Thank you for asking.
Re:Homo Mormonus (Score:5, Informative)
This suggests that throughout humans and their ancestors have been moderately polygynous.
My source being The Mating Mind by Geoffrey Miller
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Mating_Mind [wikipedia.org]
Re:tool users? (Score:4, Informative)
Re:BS (Score:3, Informative)
Re:tool users? (Score:3, Informative)
Tool construction and use is not a uniquely human trait, it's not even unique to primates.
Re:I'm not sure I see the problem (Score:5, Informative)
Re:My own $0.02 (Score:5, Informative)
Hydrogen is by far the most abundant chemical element in the Universe. Helium is second. Oxygen is third. Carbon is fourth. None of these are in any way scarce; I have no idea where you got the notion that there was a shortage of oxygen in the Universe. As for water, the solar system is full of the stuff; water vapour is present in the atmosphere of Venus, water ice is present at the Martian poles, and the outer solar system is practically made of ice. The only thing that's unusual about Earth is the presence of liquid water.
Re:Been there, done that. (Score:3, Informative)
Re:I'm not sure I see the problem (Score:2, Informative)
- The Naked Ape
, but there's been other work in the same vein. At the end of the day, it's not entertained seriously because it's simply not credible--it doesn't hold up to serious criticism. You might start with http://www.aquaticape.org/ [aquaticape.org]Re:Been there, done that. (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Been there, done that. (Score:3, Informative)
Re:I'm not sure I see the problem (Score:3, Informative)
You're Wrong. (Score:2, Informative)
http://www.creationists.org/dinos_artifacts_and_a