Northrop Grumman to own Scaled Composites 108
Dolphinzilla writes "According to Space.com, Northrop Grumman Corporation agreed on July 5 to increase its stake in Burt Rutan's Scaled Composites (designers of Space Ship One, Proteus) from 40 percent to 100 percent. They have purchased the company outright, marking a new future for the space pioneering firm. 'Scaled Composites currently is working with Sir Richard Branson's Virgin Galactic venture on a vehicle designated for now as SpaceShipTwo, which would carry two pilots and six paying passengers into suborbital space for a few minutes of weightlessness. The company also is building a new carrier aircraft, dubbed WhiteKnight2, that will carry SpaceShipTwo to an altitude of 15 kilometers before releasing it to soar to suborbital space. The two companies last year formed a joint venture called the Spaceship Company to build the new vehicles.'"
Space ship two details here (Score:3, Informative)
That's a shame. (Score:2, Informative)
proof of concepts (Score:1, Informative)
Kind of a bummer (Score:2, Informative)
Still, it was probably inevitable, and I certainly still wish them all the best luck possible.
Re:Great, but... (Score:1, Informative)
And have you stopped to consider HOW would SS1 survive an atmospheric re-entry from orbital velocity? Its heat shield can handle falling down from 100km up, there's not that much energy to dissipate, but from orbit you're coming down a Mach 25+ and the only way to get rid of that energy is by atmospheric braking. You can't take a ballistic trajectory with SS1, it would rip the structure apart. You can't take lifting re-entry like with Gemini-Apollo-Soyuz, either, a capsule can take it but not SS1. Forget the Shuttle-like re-entry too, it doesn't have a heatshield that can stand it.
You can't put a stronger heatshield on it for the same reason you can't put a more powerful engine on it: the cold rocket equations. They mass more, and the more mass you put on, the more thrust you need. The new craft would be far heavier than SS1 and you would need a bigger plane. At this point you would actually save money by going the rocket/capsule way and be done with it.
By the way, what SS1 accomplished has already been done by NASA in the '60s. Google for X-15.
You have no idea what you're talking about. Sorry to kick your puppy. Now don't cry like a baby.
Scaled's business structure (Score:2, Informative)
Northrop Grumman has been heavily involved in the Proteus program for several years now, and was looking at using an unmanned Proteus in production as their response for some DoD RFQ [wikipedia.org] a short while back . And as previously noted, they did have 40% ownership prior to this announcement, and that would buy a fair amount of influence if that's what they were going for.
My guess is that NG wanted Scaled so they could wrap up Proteus whole cloth, and who knows, maybe even resurrect some older programs like ARES or ATTT, that Scaled had trouble getting DoD attention for back in the day. And with the cash infusion, Scaled will get the capital it probably needs to keep the SS2 program moving along and into low volume production, something you don't typicallly have to worry about with one-off prototypes that are their bread and butter.