Privacy is a Biological Imperative? 181
sevej writes "As a lead-in to an article in the August 2007 issue, Scientific American recently published an interview with Carnegie Mellon computer scientist Latanya Sweeney regarding the trade-offs between security and privacy. Dr. Sweeney provides a refreshing counter-point to Sun Microsystems CEO, Scott McNealy's 'famous quip', 'Privacy is dead. Get over it.' She advocates the idea that privacy is not primarily a political expediency, but rather a biological one. Suggesting that technological design doesn't have to take a 'soup OR salad' approach, she calls for changes in the way present and future computer scientists are trained. Dr. Sweeney is quoted as saying, 'I think if we are successful in producing a new breed of engineers and computer scientists, society will really benefit. The whole technology-dialectics thing is really aiming at how you should go about teaching engineers and computer scientists to think about user acceptance and social adoption [and also that they] have to think about barriers to technology [from the beginning].'"
Yarrrr! (Score:5, Funny)
Yo ho ho a pirates life for me!
Avast!
Ohhh, you said Privacy
Biology (Score:3, Funny)
Piracy is a Biological Imperative! (Score:1, Funny)
I didn't know (Score:1, Funny)
I didn't know that engineers and computer scientist were classified by breed these days. Anyway, I'm glad there is groundbreaking research on bloodlines going on to develop this new breed that they are looking for. I hear they are expecting a breakthrough any day now.
Re:Biological necessity? Maybe so... (Score:2, Funny)
Re:Biology would be pro-active defense, not reacti (Score:2, Funny)
My potential voyeurs are already too busy looking at goatse.
I don't want to know what you do in front of your window.