Plants 'Recognize' Their Siblings 331
An anonymous reader writes to tell us that according to a recent study, Biologists have found that plants are able to recognize their own relatives. "Researchers at McMaster University have found that plants get fiercely competitive when forced to share their pot with strangers of the same species, but they're accommodating when potted with their siblings. [...] Though they lack cognition and memory, the study shows plants are capable of complex social behaviours such as altruism towards relatives, says Dudley. Like humans, the most interesting behaviours occur beneath the surface."
Re:Or... (Score:1, Interesting)
Cognition isn't the right concept (Score:4, Interesting)
The process of biochemically detecting neighboring organisms is not new. Bacteria use quorum sensing [wikipedia.org] biochemical pathways to "communicate" various things about environment such as population density -- molecules are exchanged and recognized in the extracellular environment.
What is interesting here is that presummably there are different signals for siblings and non-siblings. A more interesting result, in my opinion, would be to find the biochemical connection to this selective quorum sensing. The answer could be complicated : it could include libraries of biochemicals (in varying concentrations) and differences in bacterial flora between plants.
Re: Reading way too much into this... (Score:4, Interesting)
Regardless, there are a number of possible reasons for the effect.
Drought Tolerance (Score:3, Interesting)
--
Rent solar power with no maintenance fee: http://mdsolar.blogspot.com/2007/01/slashdot-user
Re:Or... (Score:5, Interesting)
Disclaimer, I have been reading far too much Dawkins, I am not a biologist
Re:Drought Tolerance (Score:2, Interesting)
ignoratio elenchi (Score:2, Interesting)
I have read the articles written making this claim, and examined the evidence presented. It is not even remotely compelling.
The whole of the argument was this:
1) Things that respond to injury feel pain.
2) Plants respond to injury.
3) Therefore plants feel pain.
Premise 1 has been experimentally disproven. There are many tissues in the body which humans do not feel and that heal when injured. There are cases of humans born with malformed nervous systems such that they cannot feel pain, and yet their limbs heal. Surgical removal of parts of the nervous system was performed on some animals, and their tissues healed just fine afterwords. The ability to respond to injury is not a sufficient condition of the ability to feel pain.
Furthermore, "feeling pain" is defined in terms of a chain of events within a central nervous system. Plants don't have one.
The whole concept seems to have came around just to piss off a bunch of vegetarians and try to provide some weird moral justification for eating meat (as if a moral justification was needed). The implied argument was to the effect of: if plants feel pain, and it is okay to eat them, then it is okay to eat anything that feels pain (ever heard of a "dicto simplicter" fallacy?).
So, in sum, the best biological information we have to date clearly indicates that plants do not feel pain (but they do respond to injury).
Re:Or... (Score:3, Interesting)
The closer an organism is to your genetics the closer the instinctual bond. Parents, Children, brothers, and sisters. Then extended family and finally other humans. Then other lifeforms that are most similar to humans, mammals before reptiles and fish, animals before plants, and even plants are closer and therefore more sacred than micro-organisms. Do you actually think one form of life is innately superior to another? Of course not, we just view those that are closer to ourselves as superior.
Re:Or... (Score:3, Interesting)
You may think that's there's a big difference between the plant not trying to out-compete its sibling and a human being helping their sibling. But that's just because you're being confused by the window dressing.
Re:ignoratio elenchi (Score:3, Interesting)
If you have an alligator that tears a leg off a zebra, that zebra will still try to hobble away in order to survive.
Likewise, you can tear a weed or a plant bud off the parent plant and it will try to grow on its own. That plant knows that something isn't right and it needs to adapt in order to survive.
Just because it isn't able to scream doesn't mean it doesn't feel pain. The fact it doesn't scream makes vegans feel better.
Vegans are about 50/50 in the health benefit [good for you] versus "think of the animals" [shut the hell up]. The latter are the annoying crowd that seem to represent the vegan population and may not neccessessarily be true. When I see snakes eating watermelons and tofu, I'll think about cutting meat out my diet.
Re:Or... (Score:3, Interesting)
Where's your ethical cutoff point? Why?
I eat what's appealing, same as every other animal. Do I need another reason?
Frankly, I'm very comfortable with my place in the food chain. Nature is... natural.
Re:Or... (Score:3, Interesting)
Other than that, your 'conclusions' about me are... well... let's just say uninformed.