NASA Can't Pay for Killer Asteroid Hunt 398
CGISecurity.com writes "NASA officials say the space agency is capable of finding nearly all the asteroids that might pose a devastating hit to Earth, but there isn't enough money to pay for the task so it won't get done. 'We know what to do, we just don't have the money,' said Simon 'Pete' Worden, director of NASA's Ames Research Center." But hey, it's just the potential end of the world, so nothing much to worry about there.
Re:Lets assume they had the funding (Score:5, Funny)
Duck and Cover (Score:2, Funny)
You call that a state? (Score:5, Funny)
Maryland [netstate.com]? Here in Texas, we call that a "county". Call me when you have something that can devastate a real state.
Hm. Nice planet. Shame if anything happened to it. (Score:4, Funny)
"Oh, not that we'd WANT anything to happen to Maryland, Congress. No. But, you know, sometimes things go wrong. Especially when NASA doesn't get funding. It makes NASA so disappointed when it doesn't get funding, and when you're disappointed, you sometimes don't look so hard for killer asteroids. You know how it is."
Re:About $1 Billion (Score:5, Funny)
This sounds like an entirely rational, sensible argument. As a result, I predict that it will have absolutely zero effect on anyone in Congress.
As an alternative, I suggest you come up with some "evidence" suggesting that an asteroid impact would transform their children into mutants, preferably homosexual ones; or, that the asteroids are a Arab Terrorist Plot. Double points if the asteroid is Mexican.
or... (Score:4, Funny)
Hope the MPAA doesn't see this (Score:5, Funny)
Re:About $1 Billion (Score:5, Funny)
Re:About $1 Billion (Score:4, Funny)
Re:Why would that be the case? (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Lets assume they had the funding (Score:2, Funny)
Sure we can. I saw a documentary not long ago that showed how we could fly onto the comment and drill a nuclear weapon into the core and explode it. All we need is to make sure Ben Afflack's schedule is empty.
Re:Lets assume they had the funding (Score:1, Funny)
What about Halliburton? (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Why would that be the case? (Score:4, Funny)
obligatory (Score:2, Funny)
oh, wait.
Re:Lets assume they had the funding (Score:4, Funny)
I don't think any asteroids that have hit the world in the last 100 years are likely to hit it again any time soon....
Comment removed (Score:3, Funny)
Re:I'd Rather Know (Score:1, Funny)
Fortunately, I don't have do anything once the asteroid is detected. I'm already heavily in debt and with an empty wine cellar.
Re:Lets assume they had the funding (Score:3, Funny)
Don't you just need a pick and shovel and a mule to mine with? Okay it's going to be hard to stick a space helmet on one but it's got to be cheaper than all the fancy hardware.
Re:Why would that be the case? (Score:3, Funny)
http://qntm.org/destroy [qntm.org]
Please note that the information at that site should be used for educational purposes only, and by no means should you actually attempt to destroy the world. ^_^
Easy way to get funding: (Score:2, Funny)
Re:Lets assume they had the funding (Score:3, Funny)