Statistical Accuracy of Internet Weather Forecasts 189
markmcb writes "Brandon Hansen considers the statistical accuracy of popular on-line weather forecast sources and shows who's on target, and on who you probably shouldn't rely. Motivated by a trip to a water park that was spoiled with hail despite a 'clear sky' forecast, he does a nice job of depicting deviations, averages, and overall accuracy in a manner that stats junkies are sure to love."
Can we believe the forecasts? (Score:4, Insightful)
However, the last cold blast that came through Memphis was forcast almost a week ahead of time. Weather radar of the middle part of the country showed about 90% clear of storms. So, I had a hard time with that one.
To my surprise (and right on time), down came the blast of cold air. Soon after was the promised snow/ice.
It still seems like an inexact science... with a touch of art and a pinch of luck thrown in for good measure.
Free forecast (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Can we believe the forecasts? (Score:1, Insightful)
Re:Statistics don't lie Statisticians do! (Score:5, Insightful)
Who cares about temp? Is it gonna rain? (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:Can we believe the forecasts? (Score:5, Insightful)
And anyone whose understanding of correlation goes beyond "an introductory logic class" knows that in fact, as long as you're very careful about what you're doing, you can in fact very often use observed correlations to make valid predictions.
There's this whole field of study called "statistics," see. Not the "X% of people surveyed believe Y" type of thing you hear on the news, but an actual science, grounded in rigorous mathematical theory and growing more sophisticated all the time at producing useful knowledge from mountains of data. People get PhD's in it and stuff. Really. Maybe you ought to read about it some time. Maybe even take a class.
Or perhaps you'd rather remain secure in your prejudices, repeating "correlation does not equal causation" like a mantra, snickering at people whose knowledge you choose not to understand.
We got global warming down, why not the short term (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:We got global warming down, why not the short t (Score:3, Insightful)
It's the same reason why you can't predict what you might win if you play a slot machine for an hour, whereas the casino can predict the annual profits from its slot machines to a high degree of accuracy.
Nice work? huh? (Score:3, Insightful)
Not to mention, the guy's inspiration for this was an unexpected storm-- but his analysis is limited to only hi and low temps???? Kind of like looking at the airport arrival/departure time board to decide which airline is most reliable in delivering luggage, isn't it? Excel will let you chart anything you want, but please don't try to pass it off as statistics.
Re:Nice work? huh? (Score:3, Insightful)
Living in Houston as the author of the study does, I can tell you that rain can be rather spotty. There are many times when I've been off and stayed home all day and saw no rain, while my wife, who works about a 15 minute drive away saw torrential downpours. Some areas get rain, others don't. Seems to be the same for other parts of Texas too. Trying to do a rain analysis in Houston would be rather difficult. Do you use a certain location, or just where you are during the day?