US Set on Expansion of Security DNA Collection 162
An anonymous reader dropped us a link to this New York Times article about a 'vast expansion' of DNA sampling here in the US. A little-noticed rider to the January 2006 renewal of the 'Violence Against Women Act' allows government agencies to collect DNA samples from any individual arrested by federal authorities, and from every illegal immigrant held for any length of time by US agents. The goal is to make DNA collection as routine a part of detainment as fingerprinting and photography. Privacy experts and immigrant rights groups are decrying this initiative already. Many are also skeptical of lab throughput, as FBI analysts indicate this may increase intake by as much as a million samples per year. There is already a backlog of 150,000 samples waiting to be entered into the agency's database.
Mod Parent Up (Score:5, Interesting)
private dna registrars (Score:5, Interesting)
What will you do when goverment decides private firms (haliburton, or one of your private health insurance corporations) are the best entities to run these things. Outsourcing, anyone?
How do you absolutely guarantee that the DNA database wont be used for employee application selection, or for deciding your premium on your health insurance?
I'll just mention that Sweden has a (for medical use only - but that's currently under discussion) DNA database of all in sweden newborns since 1975 (if you havent specifically asked for non-participation), called the PKU database. It's still ongoing (my little dude was just last week registred - he's a couple of weeks)
Certain "high profile" crimes have been resulted in that the use of this database is under discussion - and the debate is for what uses this database could/should be used.
My hopes are that never, ever will this database be sent to the US/Feds/CIA (as flight iternaries are), and also that private corporation use is prohibited. Think of the society where your employer knows all about your DNA... (go see GATTACA).
Sad (Score:3, Interesting)
I'm a European, I love to travel, and I've recently decided I'm not going to travel to the USA until things improve there. How sad is that?
How quickly things can change...
Re:scary quote from the article (Score:5, Interesting)
DNA and BIG BROTHER (Score:1, Interesting)
My children are good examples. One of which is a national merit scholar, who totally expects and has excepted that we are going to have a totally controlling centralized government and thinks you would be crazy to question it and set yourself up as a target. There you go.....the game is already over, it's just a matter of time.
Re:scary quote from the article (Score:5, Interesting)
It amazes me how effectively the Mexicans have been turned into the new enemy in the US.
Re:scary quote from the article (Score:2, Interesting)
There is a difference between "13% of people here illegally have been convicted of a crime in their home country," and "13% of people who are here illegally and who make enough trouble or slip up enough to get caught been convicted of a crime in their home country".
There's also a huge leap between "have a criminal record" and "have commited sexual assault".
The Kyl quote seems to skip lightly over both of these differences.
hospitals are already collecting dna (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:Sad (Score:3, Interesting)
I guess it is different visiting somewhere than being a native. When I was visiting SE Asia I was very self-conscious about being the only American. But after being around other people I didn't feel so bad. I think the problem is that our own countries reflect on us, and the problems of other countries don't bother us too much. When I was in SE Asia I saw a man slap the hell out of a woman on the street. I found it shocking but I would have been more upset, and in a different way, if he had been an American. Same with our current President. If another head of state displays his, shall we say, intellectual capacity, it's just amusing, but if it's my President then I want to hide under the table. I guess everyone's like that. I wonder if I'll get modded "troll" again for saying that all is not sweetness and light in the USA. What's with people and the troll modding?
Re:dna is cool (Score:3, Interesting)
But again, there may not be enough material on, say, a single hair follicle, to do all these tests... which is why using it on blood and semen samples is much more accurate.
But I agree with grandparent - while a DNA sample database isn't necessarily a bad thing theoretically, it is a huge violation of privacy practically-speaking.
another brick in the wall of safety. (Score:2, Interesting)