Maxwell's Demon Soon A Reality? 148
DMiax writes "Reuters reports that a group of scientists from University of Edimburgh may have realized a nanomolecular engine - a Maxwell's Demon. The device selects and traps other molecules based on their direction of motion. Physicist James Maxwell first imagined the nano-scale device in 1867, and the research team cites him as the basis for their understanding of how lights, heat, and molecules interact. The device is powered by light, and may spur advances in nano-scale technology to new heights in coming years."
Possible to make unlimited energy? (Score:4, Informative)
It's neat, but it's not Maxwell's Demon (Score:5, Informative)
This tech is certainly a mechanism for such sorting, but it's powered by external light, so the entropy of the system has not decreased and the second law isn't violated. So, while it's mechanically similar to Maxwell's Demon, it's dissimilar in concept (or should I say, "in spirit" - we're talking about demons, after all).
Of course, TFA doesn't have Leigh claiming that they've come up with Maxwell's Demon, just that he "credits Maxwell for establishing the fundamentals for understanding how light, heat and molecules behave."
None of this is to say that this isn't an impressive feat, and of obvious value in terms of furthering the science/technology of nanomachines, but calling it Maxwell's Demon is missing the whole point of the original thought experiment.
[this text added to waste time between hitting reply and submit]
Off Topic - But WTF is Opinion Center Intel (Score:4, Informative)
Mabye there's a place to make a comment or complaint about this, but it wasn't obvious so I posted it here.
Not actually a Maxwell Demon... (Score:5, Informative)
The reason that such a demon cannot be created is that the very act of making an observation (of a gas molecule's trajectory, for instance), requires the usage of energy. And on the scale we're talking about, that usage of energy is exactly the 'work' you are doing to raise the temperature of the gas in sorting the molecules. Thus no such thing as a maxwell demon can be made, and thermodynamics is intact.
This most recent report, as stated, requires an input of energy to move/sort molecules. Thus it doesn't violate thermodynamics and it's not really a Maxwell Demon. The article seems a bit confused on this issue, stating:
I would content that the light is an input of energy, and thus saying "it does not need energy" is rather silly.
In any case, the actual research (see David Leigh's page [ed.ac.uk]) is about photo-activated molecular shuttles: molecules that switch between well-defined states with input of light. You can thus trap or move other molecules using light. Certainly one step towards the much-anticipated "nanotechnology" but not quite the fine control of molecular positions one would imagine when using the term "Maxwell Demon."
Re:Light coming in? (Score:5, Informative)
But then, TFA doesn't have Leigh saying that it is Maxwell's Demon, just that he credits Maxwell with furthering science.
Re:Possible to make unlimited energy? (Score:5, Informative)
How it works (Score:2, Informative)
In layman's terms this is how the ratchet works. First, the molecule is essentially a dumbbell with a ring around it. The ring can move freely back and forth across the dumbbell, but prefers to be at either end. The dumbbell can be bent only near one end, which prevents the ring from moving. The ring catalyzes the transition from bent to strait, to allow motion. The thing is, is that the ring needs to be next to the bend for a significant amount of time to unbend the dumbbell.
So, when the ring is next to the bend, it can straiten it temporally to move across. When it is far away, it can no longer move across the bend, and since the second binding site is far away from the bend, it is stuck there. If you have two dumbbells looped end-to-end with one ring, then you would have a molecular motor. The ring is acting as "Maxwell's Daemon" to allow movement across the system.
Here's a link to the actual journal article if you care to read: http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v445/n7127/p
Re:Possible to make unlimited energy? (Score:2, Informative)
It's interesting to note that the first law, conservation of energy, is not true within General Relativity within any bounded region, due to the existence of gravitational waves. Here's an article about it http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/Relativity/