2006 Was the Warmest Year Ever 782
kpw10 writes "Dr. Jeff Masters from Wunderground has a great summary of this year's rather abnormal weather (his blog is the best source on the net for in-depth weather analysis). The post discusses some of the cyclical climate forces at work this year and compares this year's record temperatures to records from the past. There are some interesting differences, particularly in the extent of the northern hemisphere seeing record highs this year." From the article: "December's weather in the Northeast U.S. may have been a case of the weather dice coming up thirteen — weather not seen on the planet since before the Ice Age began, 118,000 years ago. The weather dice will start rolling an increasing number of thirteens in coming years, and an ice-free Arctic Ocean in summertime by 2040 is a very real possibility..." Here is the The National Climatic Data Center's report announcing the entry of 2006 into the record books.
Re:Almost all the ski slopes in Europe (Score:5, Interesting)
As to the airport closure, it was actually only closed for 36 hrs for the first storm only. On the second storm, airlines assumed a closure would happen and flights were manipulated. As it was, the airport never closed. The storm hit hard to the south east. Had the storm moved just 41 miles north, then most likely DIA would have been closed for 48 hours or more.
But in my 25 years of living in Colorado, this is the first time that I have seen this much snow on the ground at this time of year. It reminds me of xmas in south wisc (which actually had no snow).
isn't the world in denial ? (Score:2, Interesting)
Shouldn't we be preparing for the worse yet?
Instead of deciding whether or not it's really happening ?
If you can't stand the heat, get out of the planet (Score:2, Interesting)
the maths on global warming (Score:0, Interesting)
Re:Its not climate change... (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:isn't the world in denial ? (Score:2, Interesting)
It's summer here (Score:4, Interesting)
Re:Contradictory (Score:3, Interesting)
You can expect deep freezes and heat waves, no snow and blizzards. On average it will be warmer and dryer, but you can pretty much get anything day to day.
Re:Its not climate change... (Score:2, Interesting)
Speaking of strawmen, never mind that the lack of observable stellar parallax made stationary earth models scientifically more tenable. See the discussion of Tycho's observations here: http://csep10.phys.utk.edu/astr161/lect/history/b
Re:The other side the matter (Score:4, Interesting)
Personally, I never subscribe to the "we can't possibly understand it" argument. That also explains my deeply atheistic beliefs.
Re:Contradictory (Score:3, Interesting)
It's going to be real fun trying to survive in a few decades if we don't deal with the problems right now.
Re:Its not climate change... (Score:2, Interesting)
Well the attitude I've heard from several creationists is why worry about the environment when God is coming down to destroy it anyway and take us away to heaven?
Morons...
Ever? (Score:3, Interesting)
That is 0.003 percent of the age of the Earth.
Maybe they should look a little farther back. Maybe 4 Million years. Of course, if we want to look at the last 1% of the age of the Earth, we would have to look back 40 Million years.
The fact is, the climate over the last 120 thousand years could be the exception and not the rule.
Re:Its not climate change... (Score:3, Interesting)
Some company builds a house in a foreign country. Jobs created, lotsa money. good. Then, the weapon industry lobbies another country to go to war with the other foreign country. Lotsa money, lotsa jobs. good. End result? House is destroyed, bombs are consumed, nothing *useful* have been created in the end, but in the balance sheet, everything is positive, GP is raising (and everyone likes it when GP is raising). All it did is to redistribute some capital from the taxpayers to the weapon/housing industries, for a nil end result.
We have to change the way we see economy.
Re:Its not climate change... (Score:1, Interesting)
The jury is in, we know what is causing climat change and its us.
I don't know what jury you're listening to... perhaps the one that found O. J. not guilty. No, actually I think you're listening to the jury that has convicted capitalism to be guilty of every crime imaginable. While we might be having some impact on climate, it is by no means a certain thing that we're causing climate change to any large degree.
I'm certainly willing to look at unbiased evidence, but so far that's been scarce. In most cases the "evidence" is tainted by the anti-U.S., anti-capitalism, anti-progress political beliefs of those presenting it.
Re:The other side the matter (Score:4, Interesting)
We're putting a LOT of heat out, as well as large amounts of CO2. So anecdotally it seems credible to me.
The amount of heat we produce is negligible. The major concern is the CO2 we are producing which is trapping the sun's heat.
But the earth is a BIG system. Almost inconceivably big. Larger shifts in CO2 and temp have occurred historically, and just as quickly, long before humans showed up.
This is completely wrong. This is, to the best of our ability to measure it, the fastest increase in CO2 levels (and, not conicidentally, temperature) in the history of the Earth.
There seems to be a common theme in arguments against taking action against climate change: Just Making Shit Up.
Re:I'm from Houghton, Michigan... (Score:2, Interesting)
No snow for Halloween, we were happy. No snow for Thanksgiving, weirded out, but pleased. No snow for Christmas, just depressing. Then on the 5th of January (when we're usually buried under a foot of snow) it was 67 degrees. I never thought I'd grill hamburgs and hot dogs in January.
If its this warm now, I'm really not looking forward to the heat this summer.
You missed the point (Score:2, Interesting)
You missed the point the Anonymous Coward was making
The fact is that no one knows what is causing Global Warming on Mars but we know for sure that it is not caused by Martians driving around their SUVs. There are several theories and some speculate that recent solar activity (the high levels of sun-spot and solar-flares) are having an impact on Mars even though there has been no increase in irradiance; being that Mars is further away from the Sun than Earh is it would be foolish not to assume that any impact from Solar activity on Mars would impact Earth.
The fact that you didn't even look into this before you dismissed it as "unrelated" demonstrates a blind faith which should never be associated with science.
Mod parent down -1: Wrong (Score:1, Interesting)
This we simply do not know. There is no way we could get 40-50 year resolution on prehistoric CO2 or temperature levels.
How are we to believe anything you say if you are willing to pass on your guesses as facts, when it suits you? This can hardly be an honest mistake.
Here in Maine... (Score:5, Interesting)
From the National Weather Service:
[...]
The average high temperature for the month was a record 43.3 degrees. The old record was 42.8 degrees in 1953. The coldest high temperature was 24.7 degrees in 1989 and the normal December average high temperature is 36.4 degrees.
[...]
The average low temperature for the month was 25.6 degrees, warm enough to be the 3rd warmest on record. The warmest average low temperature was 27.8 degrees in 1996 followed by 26.8 degrees in 2001. The coldest average low temperature was 3.4 degrees in 1989 and the normal December average low temperature is 18.7 degrees.
[...]
The temperature never got below zero degrees in December. In fact, the coldest reading was only 9 degrees and that didn't occur until the last day of the month.
[...]
The warmest temperature for the month was 61 degrees on the 1st.
The moral zeitgeist (Score:1, Interesting)
To get to the point, there was a Hummer parked in front of the church during the service. It made me realize that I have a different set of moral standards than that person with the Hummer. I don't know what it will take to push the moral zeitgeist along to include crimes against posterity. Perhaps the Pope or someone could put forth a modern moral position with regard to global warming, but I'm sure he's too old to understand the gravity of the situation.
Sam Harris often talks about how 44% of the American people believe Jesus is coming back in their lifetime or their children's lifetime (or something like that). I don't know what it will take to convince these people that it's not true. Even if Jesus is indeed coming back, it would be necessary to assume that he wasn't. It is clear to me that the Second Coming is merely a license to not give a flying fuck.
Re:Its not climate change... (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Its not climate change... (Score:2, Interesting)
Venus' atmosphere [nasa.gov]:
Earth's atmosphere [nasa.gov]:
Mars' atmosphere [nasa.gov]:
You can't infer any correlation between CO2 and temperature with the limited dataset provided above. From general knowledge we know that electromagnetic (and thermal) fields fall off with an inverse-square of distance, so we can assume that Mars would be receiving less heat input from the sun than Earth, and Venus more.
My point is that there are more factors affecting temperature than the amount of CO2 in the atmosphere.
There might well be factors other than CO2 affecting the temperatures here on Earth, such as: a possible shift in our orbit around the sun; a possible weakening of the Van Allen Radiation Belts (allowing more radiation input); deforestation (trees help to cool things as well as absorb CO2 and product O2); Urban Heat Islands (ok, I don't buy this one myself since satellite measurements do actually show increases in some places away from urbanized areas and cooling over some others); and probably a whole bunch we haven't identified yet.
All we know for certain is that the global average temperature is increasing, but we don't actually know for 100% certain what's causing it. CO2 is just the most-likely suspect at the moment.