Russian Rocket Hits Wyoming 265
Harmonious Botch wrote in with a CNN story that opens: "A spent Russian booster rocket re-entered the atmosphere Thursday over Colorado and Wyoming, the North American Aerospace Defense Command said.
NORAD spokesman Sean Kelly said the agency was trying to confirm a report that a piece of the rocket may have hit the ground near Riverton, Wyoming, at about 6 a.m.
Kelly said military personnel had not yet reached the scene.
No damage was reported and the debris was not believed to be hazardous, NORAD said.
Eyewitnesses reported seeing flaming objects in the sky at the time the rocket was re-entering, Kelly said."
Sensationalist title or what!? (Score:5, Insightful)
Oh wait, that'd actually be good journalism. Can't have that.
Re:Sensationalist title or what!? (Score:5, Insightful)
But hey, it's only Slashdot. CNN's title was "NORAD looking for Russian rocket in Wyoming".
Re:How is it misleading? (Score:5, Insightful)
Since the Anonymous coward never molested badgers in the first place, the above headline is correct. Simply because something is technically correct does not mean it is misleading. You might want to look at the difference between "mislead" and "lie" in the dictionary. Kind of reminds me of the RNC fund raising letter where "Bush cuts deficit 40% in two years". Factually correct, but does not mention that Bush caused the deficit in the first place.
Re:Bullshit! (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Putin called a news conference (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:How is it misleading? (Score:3, Insightful)
John
Re:How is it misleading? (Score:5, Insightful)
The truly misleading word here is not "hit". The misleading word is "rocket". Had it said "rocket fragment", it would not have been misleading or particularly sensationalized to say that it hit Wyoming. In much the same way, saying "a busload of thirty people died today" is not the same thing as saying "the driver of a busload of thirty people killed himself today". :-)
Could be worse. It could have said "Russian rocket explodes over Wyoming."
Re:missle defense system? (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:How is it misleading? (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Most misleading headline ever? (Score:3, Insightful)
I'm glad we didn't nuke the planet over this. I have to wonder how many people were scrambling for their bunkers, while us civilians didn't hear anything about it until it made the news.
The rocket was a commercial launch that was announced and observed a few weeks ago. The booster stages are simply returning to earth. NORAD and amateur astronomers have been tracking this from the get-go. Just because _you_ weren't informed does not mean that it is reasonable to believe it was a first strike.