NASA Weighs Moon Plans 133
mknewman writes "Space.com is reporting that NASA is set to roll out next month a U.S. national strategy for lunar exploration, one that outlines both robotic exploration needs and the rationale for sending humans back to the Moon. This has been sorely missing in Bush's Vision for Space Exploration."
Weight? Moon? (Score:5, Funny)
Wensleydale? Gorgonzola? (Score:2, Funny)
hmm.. (Score:4, Funny)
It would depend on the number of pages, but on nice 24lb paper with a clay coating, the plans really shouldn't weigh more than a few ounces. Now, 100lb cover stock would be a different story. You might need a rocket scientist to calculate that.
Re:Weight? Moon? (Score:3, Funny)
KFG
Charge it! (Score:3, Funny)
Re:NASA weighs moon plans (Score:4, Funny)
Two flights planned (Score:2, Funny)
Re:NASA weighs moon plans (Score:2, Funny)
Re:Weight? Moon? (Score:2, Funny)
After all, that's no moon.
exit (Score:2, Funny)
why is it? (Score:4, Funny)
It's the galaxy, stupid (Score:2, Funny)
Bush wants to make Star Trek a reality, but geeks still find a way to bash him. Sheesh!
This is no laughing matter (Score:3, Funny)
Why is Bush interested? (Score:5, Funny)