Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Space Science

SuitSat Not Looking Good So Far 95

Hulboy writes "According to the SuitSat website, things aren't going well for the makeshift satellite in it's first few hours. 'Reports of nothing heard from Israel, Turkey, South Africa, and two negative reports from Japan as well as the weak report below. JH3XCU reports signal only heard in SSB mode, TX cycle and doppler detectable, but no modulation... this is not looking good.'
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

SuitSat Not Looking Good So Far

Comments Filter:
  • by max99ted ( 192208 ) on Saturday February 04, 2006 @10:41AM (#14641496)
    ...since the linked article is a whole 5 sentences:

    The suit itself: http://www.amsat.org/amsat-new/articles/BauerSuits at/index.php [amsat.org]

    People that heard suitsat - looks like it went offline about 1hr 15min into flight.

    http://suitsat.org/ [suitsat.org]

  • SuitSat tracking (Score:2, Informative)

    by Fulg ( 138866 ) on Saturday February 04, 2006 @10:42AM (#14641500) Homepage
    Help them out here: http://suitsat.org/ [suitsat.org]
  • by LineGrunt ( 133002 ) on Saturday February 04, 2006 @12:11PM (#14641818)
    People ARE reporting very weak contacts.

    (Although some people are clearly mistaking the signals coming from the ISS with the SatSuit too).

    So it is likely that the suit is still on the air, but radiating a lot lower signal than they planned.

    I'm still planning on trying to hear it the next two passes here. 11 degrees and 72 degrees. Don't have fancy az/el antennas, but I've worked the ISS and AO-27 from here so I should stand a chance.

    Grunts away!
  • Still alive but weak (Score:3, Informative)

    by CaptainBJones ( 895857 ) on Saturday February 04, 2006 @12:17PM (#14641843)
    I was up at 0355L this morning to catch the second (and best) pass to see if I could hear anything and heard nothing... BUT I gave it another shot at 1021L this morning and heard data (somewhat strong at one point...) but not enough to decode. So there still is hope... As for another piece of junk floating around up there it will fall back to earth in about 6 weeks...
  • Re:Two things... (Score:3, Informative)

    by prichardson ( 603676 ) on Saturday February 04, 2006 @01:10PM (#14642079) Journal
    Edison deserves little of the credit he has today. Basically, he had a factory full of people to test for him so he could issue a lot of patents (sound familiar?).

    "Invention is 10% inspiration, 90% perspiration." -Thomas Edison

    "Perhaps if Edison thought a little smarter he wouldn't sweat so much." - Tesla (supposedly)
  • by Anonymous Coward on Saturday February 04, 2006 @02:10PM (#14642382)
    It passes right over my house in northern Minnesota.Nasa allerts me by email,giving the time direction and duration of visability.It looks like a very bright star at -1.I searched the sky hoping to see the suit trailng behind the station,even though they said it would not be visable.I searched and found nothing trailing the station.The temp at 6:10am was 4 degrees farenheit with 40 mph winds.
      In the good old days when drinking and driving was a recreational sport.We would make a wish everytime we threw a empty beer can out the window.I would suggest NASA do the same each time they throw debris from the station.It cant hurt.
  • Re:Equipment (Score:2, Informative)

    by AndroidCat ( 229562 ) on Saturday February 04, 2006 @02:22PM (#14642453) Homepage
    Not far away at all. It's only around 200 miles out. The problem is that it only has a line of sight (VHF radio) on a small area of the Earth as it orbits. And the orbit is fairly predictable until it starts to decay.
  • by Clueless Moron ( 548336 ) on Saturday February 04, 2006 @03:18PM (#14642684)
    a paint fleck on one extremity would have at least sent it spinning and significantly altered its course

    Low earth orbit velocity is 7800m/s. The most likely, and worst way, to get hit by a paint fleck is to get hit by one in the same orbit but in the opposite direction, which would be a delta vee of 2*7800m/s.

    Let's be really generous and say a paint fleck weighs 1g and hits the suitsat (say 100kg) dead on. By conservation of momentum, the suit's velocity will decrease from 7800m/s to... 7799.844 m/s.

    In other words, it'll still be at 99.998% of it's original velocity. I won't bother calculating how little the fleck could have affected the spin, because it's not like the suit was spin stabilized to begin with. Spin fade was expected to begin with. The only significance of the fleck is that it would cause the suit to (slowly) depressurize, but more importantly possible trash the equipment if it was in the way.

    My guess is that since the equipment wasn't really designed for this kind of orbital abuse: the nasty temperature shift between night and day just caused caused some circuitry to fail from thermal expansion. Or perhaps the suit leaked; the equipment wasn't designed to work in a hard vacuum.

  • by Kadin2048 ( 468275 ) <.ten.yxox. .ta. .nidak.todhsals.> on Saturday February 04, 2006 @03:40PM (#14642770) Homepage Journal
    The SuitSat is not a problem ... really. It's in an unstable LEO, probably tumbling all over the place, impacting all sort of other small debris. If anything, it'll clean a little bit of the crap out of its way as it comes down and burns up.

    Now, if you want to talk about dangerous space junk, where you want to look is up in the higher orbits, the so-called "nuclear safe" ones. The Soviets had a series of spy satellites that (because they didn't want to have big solar panels on them in such low orbits) had nuclear reactors. Not RTGs, honest to god liquid-metal cooled nuclear reactors. They had a system to eject the reactor cores into high orbits before the satellites re-entered (which sometimes didn't work -- one of them contaminated quite a bit of Northern Canada). But even when the systems did work, the result was a rather largish chunk of very radioactive material in high orbit.

    I'm sure there is probably a lot of other dangerous junk floating around out there, too. If you want to talk about space debris, it's out in the higher orbits that you really need to look. Especially because those are the places where you'd probably want to assemble a large space station (or park big, expensive satellites with large solar collectors), and that stuff doesn't like getting hit by old crap.
  • Re:Equipment (Score:5, Informative)

    by Lumpy ( 12016 ) on Saturday February 04, 2006 @03:46PM (#14642793) Homepage
    Exactly. It WAS recieved by many hams with the right gear. A friend of mine that works sattelites all the time was able to get a decent signal and could tell it was suitsat but the audio was garbled because what he said was "the suit must be spinning wierd". He was using a home brew ALT/AZ setup with a nice 2 meter quad and a tower mounted Recieve Preamp.

    Everyone trying with their $12.00 radio shack scanner will be very dissapointed.
  • Ignorance is bliss (Score:4, Informative)

    by hausmaus ( 684529 ) <sean@outpostbbs.net> on Saturday February 04, 2006 @04:15PM (#14642909) Homepage Journal
    Evidently most of the people who've replied on here don't have a clue about amateur radio either. A big part of amateur radio is experimentation and if it doesn't work, you figure out why and do it again. Hopefully with your adjustments, corrections and redesigns your experiment will become a working item. After all, how do you think all the neat modes in amateur radio were developed? Trial and error.

    Most /.ers have no clue about working QRP (low power radio)-I mean, the thing is miles above earth transmitting on 500mW of power. Some personal stereos put out more power than that.

    But, if anyone checks, there's another unused spacesuit and more equipment on the ISS. Oh, by the way, it's ARISS (Amateur Radio on the International Space Station) http://www.rac.ca/ariss [www.rac.ca] that did this, not NASA.

    If people RTFA and do a little more reading about the news stories http://www.arrl.org/news/stories/2006/02/03/103/ [arrl.org], they just might notice little things.

    It's amazing how stupid most of these people on /. are about anything that doesn't have to do with Linux or MP3s.
  • Audio of Suitsat (Score:2, Informative)

    by Anonymous Coward on Saturday February 04, 2006 @04:25PM (#14642950)
    Someone managed to record a data burst from the suitsat:

    http://www.william-jacobs.com/personal/rnr.php?y=2 006&p=47 [william-jacobs.com]
  • Stability (Score:3, Informative)

    by MichaelSmith ( 789609 ) on Saturday February 04, 2006 @05:38PM (#14643188) Homepage Journal
    somewhat strong at one point

    There is no such thing as a spherically symetric omni antenna. I wonder if the suit has found a stable attitude which points a bad lobe straight down. Other lobes are attenuated by the atmosphere or don't point at the Earth.

    Properly designed LEO satellites take into account plasma flow at orbital altitude.

  • by stellar ( 195075 ) on Saturday February 04, 2006 @11:03PM (#14644134)
    The following update was posted to the AMSAT Bulletin Board and now appears on the AMSAT HomePage [amsat.org].

    SuitSat Status 4 Feb 2005
    ---For Immediate Release---

    Silver Spring, Maryland
    4 February 2006 at 22:00 UTC

    Paraphrasing Mark Twain....the demise of SuitSat-1 is high exaggerated!!

    It is now nearly 24 hours since the successful deployment of the SuitSat-1
    experiment. These past 24 hours have been a wild ride of
    emotions...tremendous highs...deep lows when people reported no signals and
    said SuitSat-1 was dead and now....some optimism.

    It is absolutely clear that SuitSat-1 is alive. It was successfully turned
    on by the ISS crew prior to deploy and the timing, micro-controller
    functions and audio appear to be operating nominally. The prime issue
    appears to be an extremely weak signal.

    I have heard several recordings and have monitored two passes today. When
    the signal is above the noise level, you can clearly hear partials of the
    student voices, the station ID and the SSTV signal. One of the
    complicating factors in reception is the very deep fades that occur due to
    the spin of SuitSat.

    Based on the information we know thus far, one can narrow down the issue to
    the antenna, the feedline, the transmitter output power and/or any of the
    connections in between. Through your help, we would like to narrow down
    the issue further and also gather some internal telemetry from the
    Suit. If the transmitter is running at full power, we would expect the
    Suit to end operations in the next few days to a week. If it is not, then
    it will operate much longer. Since we do not know how long this experiment
    will last, we ask for those with powerful receive stations to listen for
    Suitsat---especially during direct overhead passes when the Suit is closest
    to your area. If you can record these passes and send the audio to us, it
    would be most appreciated. We will continue to be optimistic that this
    issue will right itself before the batteries are depleted. So please KEEP
    LISTENING!

    Based on what we have learned, we would like to provide the following
    guidelines to save you time and facilitate gathering information.
    1) You need as high a gain antenna as possible with mast mounted
    pre-amps. An arrow is the minimal set...it provides very brief snipets of
    the communications. HTs and scanners won't cut it.
    2) I would not waste your time on passes below 40 degrees
    elevation. SuitSat is too far from your station to receive a reliable
    signal. We have found that closest approach provides several seconds of
    SuitSat communication with 22 element yagis.
    3) The "gold" we are looking for right now is the telemetry information
    and how long the vehicle stays operational. So if you hear any of the
    telemetry, please let us know.

    We are also working to get the voice repeater set up on ISS to downlink
    SuitSat audio on 437.80 in the event that the ISS Kenwood radio can receive
    the SuitSat transmissions. The repeater may be operational as early as
    mid-day Sunday. Please do NOT transmit on 145.99, voice or packet, until
    we have confirmed that SuitSat is no longer transmitting. These
    transmissions interfere with our ability to hear SuitSat.

    While the transmission part of the SuitSat experiment has not been stellar,
    SuitSat-1 has been tremendously successful in several areas. Some of these
    successes include:

    -We have captured the imagination of students and the general public
    worldwide through this unique experiment
    -The media attention to the SuitSat project represents one of the biggest
    ever for amateur radio
    -We have had well over 2 million internet hits on www.suitsat.org today
    -Our student's creative artwork, signatures and voices have been carried in
    space and are on-board the spacesuit---the students are now space travelers
    as the Suit rotates and orbits the Earth
    -Carr

"No matter where you go, there you are..." -- Buckaroo Banzai

Working...