Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Science News

Remains of First African Slaves Found 392

An anonymous reader writes to tell us LiveScience is reporting that Archaeologists may have found the oldest remains of slaves brought from Africa to the New World. From the article: "The African origin of the slaves was determined by studying a chemical in their tooth enamel that reveals plant and rock types of their native land. The chemical enters the body through the food chain as nutrients pass from bedrock through soil and water to plants and animals. It is an indelible signature of birthplace, the researchers said, because it can be directly linked to the bedrock of specific locales."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Remains of First African Slaves Found

Comments Filter:
  • by xXBondsXx ( 895786 ) on Wednesday February 01, 2006 @01:45AM (#14613766)
    Because 99% (at least) of immigration from Africa to the New World at the time was slavery. It is possibly they weren't slaves, but not very likely.

    Almost. That figure might be true once the slave trade boomed, but at first most Africans imported to the Americas were indentured servants.

    link: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slavery#Slavery_in_No rth_America [wikipedia.org]

    to quote the article: The first imported Africans were brought as indentured servants, not slaves. They were required, as white indentured servants were, to serve seven years.

    It is possible/relatively likely that these skeletons they examined were not slaves, but skip ahead 100 years, and that percentage shrinks to (almost) zero.
  • Re:Not... (Score:5, Informative)

    by EMeta ( 860558 ) on Wednesday February 01, 2006 @01:56AM (#14613807)
    Sounds like a flaw, except that this tooth enamel is deposited early in childhood. Especially in the early days of the slave trade, children were a rarity to export since you could get much more value per space from a fully grown person.
  • Re:Oldest (Score:5, Informative)

    by farangfrog ( 686513 ) on Wednesday February 01, 2006 @02:01AM (#14613823)
    There is a record [uca.edu] of an African slave in Hispaniola as early as 1502, brought by the Sevillian trader Juan de Córdoba.
  • I don't think so. (Score:5, Informative)

    by Descalzo ( 898339 ) on Wednesday February 01, 2006 @03:16AM (#14614039) Journal
    As horrific as the slave trade was, those articles of yours estimate there were 15 million African slaves brought to the US over the Atlantic.

    Check out http://users.erols.com/mwhite28/warstat1.htm [erols.com].

    While I agree that the slave trade was bad, Hitler, Stalin, and Mao far outstrip it.

    That page is kinda freaky.

  • by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday February 01, 2006 @03:33AM (#14614078)
    "Stalin? The Nazis and Khmer Rouge? Small potatoes to these horrors, which continued for almost two-hundred years."

    Pure bullshit puffery. I'm by no means excusing or diminishing the immense suffering slaves underwent, but if I were it still wouldn't compare to your offhand dismissal of the deaths of tens of millions. Khmer Rouge weren't brutal? Nor Stalin's purges? Please read a book before trivializing genocide again.

  • by jopasm ( 51345 ) on Wednesday February 01, 2006 @03:47AM (#14614117)
    Actually, the first part of that wikipedia article is wrong. While the first slaves in the Jamestown colony were treated as a sort of second-class indentured servant (they could eventually buy their contract out, just as any other colonist could) they were the remains of a load of slaves that didn't sell in the West Indies sugar plantations. Slavery was pretty well established on Spanish plantations by that time. Think about the economics of it - why go all the way to Africa to grab some poor souls who don't speak the language and don't know how to farm in the environment you will be transporting them to when there's plenty of people lining the docks in your home port?

    On the other hand, if you can go to africa and buy people as property, and their descendents remain property...the economics starts to make sense.
  • by Wyatt Earp ( 1029 ) on Wednesday February 01, 2006 @04:01AM (#14614155)
    Thanks, I know everyone was involved but even in Middle Eastern Studies when it comes to Islamic Slave Trade the most you see or hear is, "they had slaves" or "and these people are decended from slaves". And if pressed a professor or speaker will say, "Yes but the United States was worse."

    When it's American History slavery gets alot of attention, when it's the Middle East it's brushed aside.

    And, slavery is called for in the Bible and Koran

    Sura 2 Verse 178

    2.178: O you who believe! retaliation is prescribed for you in the matter of the slain, the free for the free, and the slave for the slave, and the female for the female, but if any remission is made to any one by his (aggrieved) brother, then prosecution (for the bloodwit) should be made according to usage, and payment should be made to him in a good manner; this is an alleviation from your Lord and a mercy; so whoever exceeds the limit after this he shall have a painful chastisement."

    "Both thy bondmen, and thy bondmaids, which thou shalt have, shall be of the heathen that are round about you; of them shall ye buy bondmen and bondmaids" (Leviticus 25:44)

    "Moreover of the children of the strangers that do sojourn among you, of them shall ye buy, and of their families that are with you, which they begat in your land: and they shall be your possession. And ye shall take them as an inheritance for your children after you, to inherit them for a possession; they shall be your bondmen for ever" (Leviticus 25:44-46)

    Yea, I got two quotes from the Bible, I'm not as up on my Koran as I am on my Old Testament.
  • by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday February 01, 2006 @04:01AM (#14614156)
    What is it with Americans?

    The house I live in is 200 years old. The school I went to was over 400. And the pub at the end of our road is nearly 700 years old.

    Why do you think a lifetime is a long time? Most mature cultures go back thousands of years. Incidentally, though many people would quote the Mansfield ruling of 1779 as marking a legal end of slavery in England, this actually marked a legal rejection of the condition of slavery, a statement that foreigners could not expect to enforce this state in England.

    If you are considering when slavery ceased to be an accepted part of life in the countries which later became the UK, this would have been in the early Middle Ages, around 1100 (not long after the Romans left and the Danes settled, around 800. The Vikings would have been the last group living in England who accepted slavery as a normal condition. Habeas Corpus, though codified in the Magna Carta (1215), was part of the common law well before this date, and indicates that freedom is the presumed state for any individual who has not been found guilty of a crime. While slavery was formally abolished in the US around 1865, the acceptance of slavery seems to have persisted in the southern states until around 1960.

    Individual English and European businessmen were still free to run enterprises in other countries where the slave laws were different. But the reason why the US is considered so culpable on this question is that it maintained a hypocritical stance of freedom from commercial taxes but slavery for people, which the rest of the Anglo-Saxon community had rejected about 800 years earlier.
  • Comment removed (Score:3, Informative)

    by account_deleted ( 4530225 ) on Wednesday February 01, 2006 @04:12AM (#14614182)
    Comment removed based on user account deletion
  • by Wyatt Earp ( 1029 ) on Wednesday February 01, 2006 @04:19AM (#14614209)
    I'm a military historian working on my Masters and one of my areas of study is the American West 1865-1890 and from that I've looked alot at the Cortes Expedition, in fact I just spent a term working on a paper comparing and contrasting the militaries of the Aztecs to the Spanish.

    The Expedition did kill alot of nobles and military leaders, once in a, maybe, unprovoked attack on the Temple of the Moon during a High Holy day and then alot of others were killed during the following responses at the Palace of Axayactl, Cortes's relief and escape and the Battle of Otumba in 1520 and then in the fighting of 1521.

    Since the leadership of the Aztecs and other nations in the region lead from the front so to speak, the decapitation of the ruling families and thier destruction largely came about on the field of battle in 1520 and 1521. The sack of Tenochtitlán in 1521 really was the only time there was torturing and murder by the Spanish and thier allies in the conflict. Most of the Aztec, Tepeacan and other allied leaders were lost in the field before the illnesses and murders during the sack.

    Recall that during the period following the retreat of the Spanish and Tlaxcalan from Tenochtitlán envoys from the Aztecs tried to pull the Tlaxcalan leaders into an alliance, however the severity of the Aztec relations with their neighbors trumped the Aztec called for unity in the face of invasion by outsiders even though the Tlaxcalan and Aztecs shared ancestry and gods. The Aztecs apparently treated others in the region so poorly that the Tlaxcalans would not come to thier aid even though they had a history togeather.
  • by killjoe ( 766577 ) on Wednesday February 01, 2006 @04:24AM (#14614224)
    Did you read the article. More then eight million slaves died on the ships crossing the atlantic. From disease mostly so it was a slow and painful death at that. I bet many ships threw their slaves overboard when dysentary was spreading to spare the crew.
  • Comment removed (Score:3, Informative)

    by account_deleted ( 4530225 ) on Wednesday February 01, 2006 @04:29AM (#14614230)
    Comment removed based on user account deletion
  • by DrSkwid ( 118965 ) on Wednesday February 01, 2006 @09:11AM (#14614905) Journal
    So many cultures discovered / realised / deduced things that western eurpoeans had to discover / realise / deduce again later .

    The early Indian astronomers are largly forgotten but around 500AD a guy called Àryabhata [htttp] taught that the earth is a sphere and rotates on its axis, and that eclipses resulted from the shadows of the moon and earth.

    If you are interested the Archaeogeodesic achievements of the Ancients then that whole site is a good reference : http://www.jqjacobs.net/astro/aegeo.html [jqjacobs.net]

    The Islamic scholar Abu Arrayhan Muhammad ibn Ahmad al-Biruni [st-and.ac.uk] probably read Àryabhata's works 500 years later, he certainly wrote of Indian astronomy in his work "India". This is the same al-Biruni who calculated the radius of the earth to be 6339.6 km using the angular incidence of shadows.

    The Indians did more than invent 0, they contributed much of the numerals which we often mistakenly label Arabic in origin, al-Biruni writes [st-and.ac.uk] : "What we [the Arabs] use for numerals is a selection of the best and most regular figures in India."

    Ancient true black African contributions are a little less well documented, the writings struggling to survive the 5000 years necessary, even if someone bothered to patent "I have discovered how to make a rotating disk from three pieces of wood such that they can aid in transporting goods", but it's legacy lives on in your mouse : the wheel. As well as the agricultural revolution, copper, tin, bronze (the ore for which was transported from Asia & Syria), the potters wheel ("the first really mechanical device").

    I, for one, thank our black African ancestors, our Islamic discoverers (one of whom even made a pin-hole camera using a whole room, it might have been al-Biruni but I can't find a cite !) and our Indian scholars.

    Even today we can't even get the history of science right. The NYT recently published a story with the summary : Robert P. Crease, a member of the philosophy department at the State University of New York at Stony Brook and the historian at Brookhaven National Laboratory, recently asked physicists to nominate the most beautiful experiment of all time.

    I here's a non-NYT link to the list :
    http://physics.nad.ru/Physics/English/top10.htm [physics.nad.ru]

    See what's number 2. Pfft, he didn't even do that demonstration, let alone discover the phenomena.

    The Belgian-Dutch mathematician, Simon Stevinus, did the demonstration in 1586.

    Ironically, the article does have a great lesson : "he [Galileo] had demonstrated the importance of taking nature, not human authority, as the final arbiter in matters of science."

  • Re:I don't think so. (Score:3, Informative)

    by Jbrecken ( 107271 ) on Wednesday February 01, 2006 @11:50AM (#14616025)
    Slavery is alive and kicking in many parts of the world! I am not going to come up with a link, since it is so obvious.
    Here's a link to the American Anti-Slavery Group, where you can find information on where slavery is currently happening, and what you can do to help: http://www.iabolish.org/ [iabolish.org]

Living on Earth may be expensive, but it includes an annual free trip around the Sun.

Working...