X Prize Foundation Encourages DNA Decoding 100
Carl Bialik from the WSJ writes "The X Prize Foundation, the group behind the $10 million prize for human space flight, 'plans to offer a $5 million to $20 million prize to the first team that completely decodes the DNA of 100 or more people in a matter of weeks, according to foundation officials and others involved,' the Wall Street Journal reports. 'Such speedy gene sequencing would represent a technology breakthrough for medical research. It could launch an era of "personal" genomics in which ordinary people can learn their complete DNA code for less than the cost of a wide-screen television.' But don't set aside that TV purchase just yet: Foundation officials don't expect the prize money to be claimed for five to 10 years."
Re:Costs? (Score:4, Insightful)
A whole new era of tire-kicking. (Score:5, Insightful)
While there's no disputing that speedy, accurate genome sequencing will have a significant positive impact, being the pessimist I am, I can't help but dwell on the possible downsides:
Brave new world, indeed.
Oh, this is just GREAT news. (Score:5, Insightful)
Sloppy language in TFA (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:A whole new era of tire-kicking. (Score:3, Insightful)
I have CF and Celiac. Trust me, it's the Old World, brother. You're just about to emigrate is all. Being stripped and deloused is just part of the deal.
KFG
Re:Costs? (Score:3, Insightful)
For them, it wasn't (just) about the X-Prize and its money. That was just icing on the cake; the "real money" will probably come afterwards (we'll see how well Virgin Galactic does). I could very easily see the same thing happening with this new prize and the people who are already interested in such DNA decoding.
Re:A whole new era of tire-kicking. (Score:1, Insightful)
I understand these concerns. But we--as in you and me and everyone else on earth--wouldn't have the capabilities we do now if it hadn't been for natural selection. Leave the system alone--through policy and other conscious efforts--and the system will regulate itself; people will evolve into better, more advanced bio-machines.
Darwin's survival-of-the-fittest applies to all living creatures, including us humans. I'm so tired of people presuming that we can somehow change the inevitable. Yes, I care about the handicapped and the unfortunate--indeed I am handicapped, but it's simply the nature of nature that these people will be weeded out; it advances the entire species as a whole; future generations will reap the rewards of nature acting as it always does.
This doesn't mean that we shouldn't help misfortunate people; we should. But we shouldn't let the "downsides" of these types of scientific advances prevent us from going ahead with them.
Is this a hoax? (Score:1, Insightful)