New Ion Engine Being Tested 217
Dr Cool writes "A new design of spacecraft ion engine has been tested by the European Space Agency which dramatically improves performance over present thrusters and marks a major step forward in space propulsion capability. Ion engines are a form of electric propulsion and work by accelerating a beam of positively charged particles (or ions) away from the spacecraft using an electric field. ESA is currently using electric propulsion on its Moon mission, SMART-1. The new engine is over ten times more fuel efficient than the one used on SMART-1."
Re:Don't go getting any ideas (Score:3, Informative)
oh yeah?
Re:cool but (Score:5, Informative)
Conservation of angular momentum says that if you turn on a gyroscope, the spaceship must start rotating in the opposite sense so the total angular momentum is the same as in the beginning. At some point you stop the gyroscope and the ship stops rotating.
YANAP... (Score:5, Informative)
Re:cool but (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Increase in the number of grids (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Increase in the number of grids (Score:5, Informative)
If you put a high-voltage grid after a low-voltage one, the ions would be repelled by it, not attracted. The voltage gradient must go in one direction: out of the thruster. I'm no scientist, but I don't think you'd gain much by adding a third couple of grids inbetween the two with a medium-voltage level. It would probably be more fruitfull to simply increase the difference between the high and low levels.
I assume the last two grids are low for the same reason the first two are high, to prevent errosion.
Re:Free Fuel? (Score:2, Informative)
Also, as an European whose tax money is being spent on these ESA projects, I am slightly annoyed by the assumption that "brits" are the only ones behind ESA. The British contribution to ESA's budget is less than 14.2%, which is the portion Italy (the third biggest contributor) stands for, with the Germans (22.7%) and French (29.3%) being second and first.
Re:Old News (Score:5, Informative)
So while the ESA is desperately trying to generate some positive press to help people forget about their recent failings the good old US of A is putting proven and effective technology into getting back to the moon.
Care to point out some of the recent failure sof ESA?
As a sidenote: the currently only ion drive propulsed moon orbiter is a european one
angel'o'sphere
Re:cool but... oranges and apples (Score:5, Informative)
Actually, in many cases you can get where you want to go with little or no thrust at all, simply by riding the elevator up past the altitude of geosynchronous orbit. The higher above that altitude you go, the greater the centrifugal force from being spun around the Earth, so it's just a matter of calculating when to let go of the elevator.
Re:Why increase grids? (Score:2, Informative)
A chemical rocket has a specific impulse of about 300 s-400 s, while a typical ion thruster has something closer to 3000 s. This new design should be 12,000s I guess
Obviously for a larger mission than DS1 or this ESA probe, doubling them up to get more thrust is definitely a necessity, although there are limits, because each new thruster adds to the mass signficantly.
Re:cool but (Score:4, Informative)
It would drasticly reduce the cost to throw things into space.
One idea is to put a linear acellerator on the side of mount kilimanjaro (strategic position near equator)
and use it to "kickstart" rokets. this way you can get more payload from a smaller rocket that uses less fuel.
Re:cool but (Score:3, Informative)
Re:210,000 m/s?!? (Score:3, Informative)
SOL ~= 300,000 km/s, not m/s.
210,000 m/s / 300,000,000 m/s = 0.07% the speed of light
(much more believable)
Re:Charge accumulation? (Score:4, Informative)
They have an electron gun that shoots electrons the same way the ions go, so the net charge is close to 0.
Alleged FTL experiments (Score:3, Informative)
Nimtz is a clever PR guy but a lousy physicist. Every physics undergrad should know that both the group and phase velocity of electromagnetic waves can have arbitrary values and that this doesn't contradict special relativity. The important question is how fast information is being transmitted and for this neither the group nor the phase velocity is suitable.
Re:cool but... oranges and apples (Score:3, Informative)