S. Korea Cloning Success Faked? 199
minus_273 writes "The BBC is reporting that it appears that the human cloning in Korea might have been faked." From the article: "At least nine of 11 stem cell colonies used in a landmark research paper by Dr Hwang Woo-suk were faked, said Roh Sung-il, who collaborated on the paper. Dr Hwang has agreed to ask the US journal Science to withdraw his paper on stem cell cloning, Mr Roh said ... Last month, Dr Hwang resigned from his main post as head of the World Stem Cell Hub, after it emerged that some of the eggs used in his research were donated by his staff - in contravention of international guidelines. Now it is some of the research itself which is being called into question."
More informative link (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Hang on (Score:3, Informative)
But one of the participants in the project claims that 11 colonies from the set on which the paper was based on were fake [iht.com]. Which is likely to put the credibility of whole thing in a rather negative light in the scientific community, to put it mildly.
Re:Hang on (Score:5, Informative)
You're right. That's why TFA and TFS don't say that the the results have been proven a fake. But not proven != not true.
" I think it is only some of the 'morality' of the experiment that could be called into question so far."
No. RTFA. At the minimum, read TFS, since TFA is
Re:Faked how? (Score:2, Informative)
]{
Re:Hang on (Score:5, Informative)
Questions... (Score:1, Informative)
Didn't pesky concerns like peer review, and other scientists attempting to repeat his success bother him?
Fake studies always gets exposed given time, so what benefit did he think he was getting out of this?
Scientific American: Hwang researcher of the year (Score:4, Informative)
If the allegations about fabricating and faking the data are true, then I'm curious what the editors at SciAm will do? Rename him to "Fraud Leader of the Year"?
scientific method would eventually find out (Score:3, Informative)
A classic case was immunopsupression of skin grafts. One guy was painting mouse fur to appear like it came from a different result. People couldnt reproduce what he said he was supposed to be doing.
Re:Sensational but not factual yet (Score:1, Informative)
This is not about science nor about ethics. (Score:1, Informative)