Man Cures Himself of HIV? 909
IZ Reloaded writes "A 25 yr old British man could be the first person in the world to have cured himself of the deadly HIV virus. He was diagnosed HIV positive in 2002. After another test done the following year, he stunned doctors when his test results turned negative. He is now a wanted man after researchers and doctors want him to come back for further testing but he has so far refused. Experts think he could have something in his immune system that may help in producing vaccines against HIV."
How sure? (Score:5, Interesting)
First test (Score:2, Interesting)
Most likely explanation (Score:5, Interesting)
There's something fishy about the way this story is being stage managed by the News Of The World (a notoriously downmarket and sensationalist paper). I predict an expose and retraction within the week.
It's not surprising (Score:4, Interesting)
The Plague, which ravaged Europe and decimated its urban populations may be one reason the immunity (or strong resistance, if you prefer) to HIV was found first in a European. Those who survived the Plague, among those who were exposed to it, had a genetic trait that gave them immunity. This may be one reason why Europeans are generally less susceptible to the virus than other ethnicities whose populations were not exposed to a very widespread and violently virulent disease.
Good news for this guy! Hopefully the answer to the disease is found in his bloodstream.
he's not the first (Score:4, Interesting)
First? What about the African Prostitutes et.al.? (Score:5, Interesting)
I'm sure I am not the only one that has seen documentries that include African prostitutes that have gathered a similar immunity to the virus. One of them was a Nova episode that aired on PBS last week (atleast I think it was last week). The women are exposed to the disease many times per day but seem unnafected by it. This sounds like a similar case for the following reasons:
Article [aegis.com]
The article states that 1) The prostitutes are completely void of the virus and 2) The trait is not genetic. Therefore I assume that the people contract the virus and their immune system then deals with it. In this man's case if the first test was done before his immune system kicked in and the second one after then this could explain the result.
P.S. I am not a doctor or in the medical field so I leave myself open to corrections. (and not just for my english ;0)
Re:How sure? (Score:3, Interesting)
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/4432564.stm [bbc.co.uk]
Some 14 months later he was offered another test by doctors, which came back negative.
He sought compensation but has apparently been told there is no case to answer because there was no fault with the testing procedure.
Old news... already happened in africa... (Score:3, Interesting)
I wonder what happened to it...
But to have a second mutation for immunity are great news... Now i hope it does not get sweeped unter the carpet from big companies earning money with selling syptopm-fighting medicaments that don't *really* help at all...
Re:Infect Him Again (Score:3, Interesting)
If it is bog standard ELISA it does not actually detect HIV. It detects antibodies produced against it. So if you do not have any immune responce to HIV whatsoever you will return a negative result.
There are other tests of course which are based on amplifying DNA off the original virus RNA template. Most of these are alpha quality and they are not done as a part of the normal testing procedure.
So the obvious question here is - what tests did he undergo.
Other cases of HIV immunity (Score:4, Interesting)
HIV is getting milder (Score:3, Interesting)
so what happens after the initial explosion of cases is that a disease evolves to limit mortality: the germs that get passed on are the ones that are able to somehow keep the host alive as long as possible to continue the spread. the point is to commandeer the body to replicate as many copies as possible and spread it for as long as possible, but not to sap the body's resources so much as to kill the host. the HIV you could get today can kill you, but not as fast and with not as much certainty as the HIV you could get in 1985
killer pandemics happen because a virus or bacteria stumbled by mistake into the good fortune of easy spread amongst a population of animals, the mortality is just an unwanted side effect. this is true of the spanish flu of 1918 too: what once could kill you easily, well you yourself probably got that exact same strain sometime in your life, and it was probably a mild case of the flu or sniffles
this attenuation is true of all diseases. but don't let it fill you with false confidence. the flu or HIV can still kill you, easily. just a little less easily
Please consider this... (Score:1, Interesting)
Everything old is new again (Score:3, Interesting)
It's sort of sad that it's taken this long to confirm.
Re:First? What about the African Prostitutes et.al (Score:3, Interesting)
"The most probable explanation for the finding of HIV-specific CTL, able to kill virus-infected cells, in apparently uninfected but repeatedly HIV-exposed women is that they have been immunized by exposure to HIV," notes Dr. Sarah Rowland-Jones of the Molecular Immunology Group at Radcliffe Hospital in Oxford.
That would seem to contradict your genetic theory.
Some explanations... (Score:3, Interesting)
Immediate reaction: Sue the moron who screwed up your test. And anyone who says otherwise is a liar, because you know we all would do just that in any typical situation, right?
However, in his likely initial investigation, with solicitor in tow, he finds out that, DAMN! He is cured after all!
WTF?
Now...stop and consider the situation.
He's cured. He's alive. Barring suicide or accident, he's now the world's documented repository for The Cure for AIDS.
He's facing a life sentence now, literally, of being drained of his blood on a regular basis, having it shipped all over the world, and essentially being better protected than George W. Bush visiting a gay cowboy coke bar.
Unless and until they can isolate his factor, whether blood, genetic, mutational or whatever, he is going to be a prisoner of his condition...and Ghod help him if some pharmaceutical corporate patents his blood and makes him pay up or give up.
Whether he wants to cooperate or not is going to be moot...sooner or later, he will be drafted/conscripted/incarcerated under some obscure public safety law and turned into State property in the UK/SCotland. If he were in the US, he'd be stamped "PROPERTY OF HALLIBURTON" and turned into a rich person's personal inoculation center.
He may _want_ to cooperate and be sure everyone who needs to be is cured.
Reality, on the other hand, is likely smashing him in the face and making him well aware of what the future holds for him.
His only hope is that we find others like him, or find out it's a relatively simple procedure to duplicate what his body is doing and mass-produce it...and even then, it's highly doubtful that the medical companies will ever let him see a penny for it.
Too cynical? Too bad.
Re:HIV is getting milder (Score:3, Interesting)
There is no reason for HIV to become "milder". It is a long term infection which provides its host ample time to reproduce and begin raising a child. It is spread only through close contact and, most likely, repeated contact (See the study comparing infection rates between Africans and S.E.Asians).
To be honest, with the 5 to 20 year dormancy, HIV is rather well suited for a host with a reproductive cycle that starts at in the early to mid teens. It would be perfect for a creature who had a life expectancy of up to mid thirties, begins reproducing at around 15 and has repeated sexual contact with a number of different people.
Kind of like prehistoric man.
Re: The real deal. (Score:5, Interesting)
So they claim a cure, However this could just as easily been a results as a localised infection (perhaps in a few skin cells) that had then died.
If the guy really did kill off the HIV virus, then those anti-bodies will still be readily available (If you kill it once, your body will kill it again, no problem)
Re:How sure? (Score:3, Interesting)
I would, however, be very leery of the original test. The aids test does give false positives, I would expect him to be one.
Donna Maclean, Europe, and the WTO (Score:2, Interesting)
No, she *applied* for a patent, but it has not been granted. There is a vast gaping chasm between applying for a patent and actually being granted it.
In Europe you cannot patent genetic codes for people, animals or plants - at least not right now. The fear is that if large corporations [slashdot.org] manage to enforce bio-patents on the rest of the world via pressure from the WTO.
Re:Infect Him Again (Score:2, Interesting)
"Every two months he was going for blood tests and checks on his liver, heart and immune system."
Blood tests doesn't mean HIV tests. Especially sinde they follow up with:
"So in October 2003 he was offered a repeat HIV test -- and the result came back negative."
That makes it sound as if that was his first HIV test since he tested positive.
Given that he continued to have intercourse with his partner who was known to be infected (maybe he should be rechecked too if they went to the same clinic!) then I'd guess he really did have it and just might have beaten it in some way.
Regardless it was bound to happen. There are always people who are immune (or their immune system is better equipped to fight) any given disease, virus, etc.
Re:CCR5 mutation (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Infect Him Again (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:CCR5 mutation (Score:2, Interesting)
Assuming all the tests were correct, I'd say this is something completely different.
Similar event in 1998 (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:It's not surprising (Score:2, Interesting)
Both attack the same T cells in the immune system, and both even bind to the same CD4 receptor of the T cells. Thus, mutations in the CD4 receptor that are still functional to the organism but disallow the binding by the pathogen would create a form of immunity.
I heard about some research that claims that this is the case
http://www.abc.net.au/science/k2/moments/s714968.
So if you're from N Europe, have upto a 14% chance of immunity to Aids.
Interestingly enough there's an analogue to African restistance to malaria -
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/disease/sickle.html [nih.gov]
Sickle cell anemia is obviously not a good thing to have, but it does give you some resistance to malaria.
Makes you wonder what the downside to not having CCR5 proteins is.
the first test was done during primo infection ? (Score:3, Interesting)
JD Shapely, aids martyr ... (Score:4, Interesting)
Science and Fiction
Re:Refused? (Score:5, Interesting)
It's a pretty amazing opportunity if you think about it.
Re:This guy wants compensation?! (Score:3, Interesting)
So, in order to cover their legal arses, the hospital came up with this miracle?
1. Botch HIV test
2. Get sued
3. Generate Hocus Pocus theory
4. Profit (or at least don't lose a few million)
AIDS test unreliable in African countries (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:How sure? (Score:5, Interesting)
At the meeting which my father wanted me at, he asked " since it's me you are testing on, what is the cut of the action I will get for each one sold" Honest questions ask jokingly. The reply was: you got to be kidding, we don't do such a thing.
my father turned serious and said to them, "OK, I'm no longer interested". They replied, "but you'll be dead in a year", dad said " OK, so what, find someone else". We just got up and left... this was 10 years ago and dad is still alive, he's got some special rare blood that they pay ton of money for, but instead he finds children research places and gives it away as charity.
From a business stand point, the guy is sitting on a gold mine. I would offer myself up to the back end residual bidder and get the royalties.
From a human level, I would negotiate that the cure should be offered straight out as generic drug. everyone could win.
The guy has a right to do nothing legally. Now the question comes, does he have the moral rights to do nothing?
onepoint
Re:How sure? (Score:2, Interesting)
I agree. Anyone who is cured would and should want to help. I got the impression from TFA, however, that this particular individual doesn't believe he was cured. The only logical reason I can see that he would want to sue is that he believes that the first test that showed him as HIV positive was the result of some kind of error on the part of the lab.
He mentions being depressed and suicidal afterwards. Assuming that the company who tested him was at fault for a false positive result, I can see him being very angry about the entire situation.
There is, of course, no proof that I'm aware of to validate that position, but if we're going to speculate on this guy's motives, it can't hurt to speculate from any side we can think of....
Re:How sure? (Score:2, Interesting)
Microsoft wants it for this purpose. You don't trust their motives, you think they'll just use it for their own profit and exploit people and you just want to be left the hell alone.
And saying that you'd release your program under GPL is not an option, as this option doesn't exist in the medical world.
Should I piss in your eye now?
You have a right to your property, if my body isn't my property, then what the hell is?
Re:No need to ask (Score:1, Interesting)
1.) I am a virgin (I know, I know, you must be in shock)
2.) I have never done drugs (needle or not)
3.) I have never had a blood transfusion (pre early 80s or not)
It turns out that if you have a virus of any kind when you donate you'll get flagged. I had a cold the next day. They performed three tests, the first one was positive, and the second two, which I suppose are more refined, tested negative. Great relief, but you think they could have mentioned that in the letter they sent me!
HL-60 and $$$ (Score:2, Interesting)
If I was that guy, knowing that drugs are a 500,000,000,000 dollar a year industry and it could be reasonably assumed that a cure to aids is wortth billions I'd want some considerable financial consideration. Say $100,000,000 down and %10 thereafter.
Re:Science subject (Score:5, Interesting)
Drug development costs (Score:4, Interesting)
Re:How sure? (Score:4, Interesting)
The most interesting thing about HIV tests is that they actually check for AIDS instead! The most common test, the one claimed to be false-positive proof, works by counting your white blood cells. If you have HIV but not AIDS (Yet?) it will read negative. If you are feeling under the weather due to job stress and the flu, it will read positive. If you have lukemia, positive. If you have been exposed to radiation, positive. If you are taking certain herbal anti-fungal agents that supress the immune system, positive. In other words, it is all but useless.
Re:Science subject (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Science subject (Score:2, Interesting)