Water Vapor Causing Climate Warming 434
karvind writes "According to BBC, new studies suggest that water vapor rather than carbon dioxide in the atmosphere is the main reason why Europe's climate is warming. The scientists say that rising temperatures caused by greenhouse gases are increasing humidity, which in turn amplifies the temperature rise. This is potentially a positive feedback mechanism which could increase the impact of greenhouse gases such as CO2. Even though 2005 will probably be warmest year, climatologists still differ in opinion"
It's not water vapor (Score:1, Funny)
Thinking about global warming... (Score:1, Funny)
At least its a dry heat? (Score:4, Funny)
So what can we do then? (Score:5, Funny)
1. Stop drinking water
2. Stop breathing
3. Stop taking showers (note: this doesn't apply to some countries such as France and Mexico)
Re:So what can we do then? (Score:1, Funny)
Dihydrogen Monoxide (Score:2, Funny)
Comment removed (Score:3, Funny)
Comment removed (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Title and Summary are misleading (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Welcome to ten years ago (Score:1, Funny)
Yet the harder they estimate the quicker it raises.
Re:Isn't this like saying: (Score:2, Funny)
A bullet fired from a gun does not cause death! It's the injury that causes death.
If the injury happens to be caused by a bullet, that's the injury's fault. But just firing bullets does not kill people.
Some bullets cause injuries that cause death, but some bullets cause injuries that don't cause death.
Also some injuries caused by things other than bullets do cause deaths, and some deaths happen without injuries.
You can't tell, by just looking at a bunch of bullets, which ones would cause a deadly injury, which ones would cause a non-deadly injury, and which ones would fall harmlessly somewhere or end up in the drywall.
Finally some bullets are never fired.
So stop trying to blame the bullets. Bullets don't kill people.
Re:IT'S BUSH'S FAULT!! (Score:3, Funny)
I just knew it there was a catch! (Score:3, Funny)
In other news... (Score:2, Funny)
Re:So what can we do then? (Score:2, Funny)
Nukes and paranoia (Score:4, Funny)
When I was a kid the world was going to be destroyed by nukes. Either WWIII would happen and MAD would do us all in or a nuclear reactor would go out of control somewhere and destroy everything. Pay attention kids, that's really the way it was for us. They taught it to us in school, it was the theme of many of our Saturday morning cartoons, it was in every magazine and book and all over the TV.
That myth was slowly shattered over time. The Soviets had a couple of nuke reactor problems and so did we. Life went on. Then the USSR fell and the idea of MAD went away with it. Suddenly nukes didn't seem so frightening. People started to wake up to the fact that life was even going on in the cities that the US had nuked in WWII.
So what do we do without the threat of nukes? Without the fear of nuclear death we would have to accept the fact that the fate of every living thing might be in the hands of a higher power or, worse yet, not in the hands of anyone at all. As humans we can not accept that. Something or someone must be in control and we like it best if we can imagine it to be us as we had imagined it with nukes.
So now there is some data that can be stretched to imagine that the climate of our planet will kill us all. That's even bigger and more scary than nukes. Children can be taught to fear that with ease. Better yet, our ego will allow us to believe that we can control it, that we caused it. And most of us can accept as fact that although we caused it there is nothing we can do to correct it.
Yes, we're all going to die.