Safe Cigarettes? 844
CDPatten writes "The UK Times Online is reporting that we could see a 'safe cigarette' next
year. From the article: 'BRITISH American Tobacco
(BAT) is to launch a controversial 'safer cigarette' designed to cut the risk of
smoking-related diseases such as cancer and heart failure by up to 90%.'
I wonder if this will have any impact on the no smoking bans we have seen in recent years?"
Re:bans? (Score:3, Informative)
Cigar/ette (Score:1, Informative)
Philip Morris LIES (Score:5, Informative)
Internal memos from Philip Morris [tobaccodocuments.org] from April 1980 indicate that the tobacco companies have been fully aware of radioactivity in cigarettes for over two decades. They also knew of ways of eliminating the radioactivity, but wrote them off as a "valid but expensive point":
Furthermore, switching to indirect fire curing would eliminate virtually all of another carcinogen, nitrosamine, from cigarettes. Nitrosamine was previously found in BEER thanks to direct fire curing of barley. Switching to indirect fire curing of barley reduced nitrosamine in beer to indetectable levels. Yet Philip Morris makes Marlboros, cigarettes with more nitrosamine than any others in the world [smh.com.au].
Yes, believe what Philip Morris says, because if you realized there could be a safe cigarette, it would cost them a lot of money...
Here's two simple manufacturing changes they could make which would eliminate the two most potent carcinogens from cigarettes. But I guess it's just cheaper for Philip Morris to kill their customers.
No, no, no (Score:4, Informative)
Disclaimer: I smoke, and after having tried to quit twice and turned into a raging hellbeast on account of it, I am going to wait until things are a bit more stable before I try again. Its actually quite entertaining in hindsight; there is a euphoric initial period, where all the senses that were dulled by the drug come roaring back (like pins and needles all over your body for days) followed closely by a manic depressive section, and then there is a long trudge through what can only be described as psychotic paranoia, in the true clinical sense. Small problems become niggling problems, which must be someones fault, and then these people must be taught not to make the same mistake again. Its pretty hard to keep in check.
But hold on a second there sparky, the only evidence you present is anecdotal, and for all we know you could be pulling it directly from your posterior. Let me try...
I had severe headaches since I was 18, but then I started smoking because after all the doctors couldn't help, a homeopathic practitioner mentioned it might be beneficial.
Sounds just as good as yours, and is just as pulled out of my arse. Anyway the real issue isn't so much health as it is the addictive nature of nicotine. Its a drug, that has no benefits, is toxic in every respect, and it should be just as outlawed as heroin. I recall reading somewhere that the withdrawal symptoms are actually more severe, how true that is I cannot attest to. The only reason it is allowed is because it was in common use before the laws really started to crack down on drugs.
Most smokers smoke and continue to do so because they like most people foolishly started in their rebellious teens, and are now hooked on the things well into adulthood.
So stop talking shite.
American Tobacco - Ionizing Radiation (Score:1, Informative)
http://www.webspawner.com/users/radioactivethreat
http://www.bedoper.com/ [bedoper.com]
There is NO SAFE CIGARETTE... (Score:3, Informative)
Re:tobacco still sucks - canabis (Score:3, Informative)
here's some
http://www.honeyrose.com/ [honeyrose.com]
Personally, I just smoke a bong.
Damn Ex-Smoker words below (Score:5, Informative)
I set a day and time for me to quit (Friday at 17:00) and chainsmoked up to that point. At 17:00 I placed the remainder of the pack on my counter and left them there. When I had a craving, I smelled the tobacco and placed the pack back on the counter. The aches from the wonderful chemicals leaving my joints were relieved by ibuprofin. And I kept saying to myself, I have gone (insert time) without a cigarette, I will wait a few hours and get one if I need it. The mantra kept repeating, setting goals and pushing them higher and higher.
I threw the pack away three months later with the same contents as it had that Friday. Food and drinks tasted better, my newborn son's asthma went away (I smoked outside, but the smoke comes in on your hair, hands, and clothing), and my wallet was fuller.
I feel so much better now that I would suggest quitting to anyone. People around you will understand if you are a bit of a Hellbeast, and will forgive you if you matter to them. If they don't, screw them they don't care for you anyway.
Re:tobacco still sucks (Score:2, Informative)
Comment removed (Score:4, Informative)
Re:Still Safe? (Score:5, Informative)
Smoking bans not only make public places healthier, they also demonstrate very simple ways in which the free market doesn't effectively model choice or social preferences. Especially when the markets are controlled by minorities with deeply vested practices, irrational needs and a budget to promote detrimental group behavior. For clues, note how expensive smoking is in product and healthcare, and how many people behave uneconomically within the algebra of junkie need.
Re:tobacco still sucks - canabis (Score:4, Informative)
He said the difference was mainly due to nicotine in tobacco, whereas cannabis may inhibit cancer because of the presence of the chemical THC.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/4350642.stm [bbc.co.uk]
Presumably you can back up your own statement?
Re:tobacco still sucks - canabis (Score:3, Informative)
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/684328.stm [bbc.co.uk]