First modernized GPS satellite Launched 221
A reader writes "The first GPS 2R-M satellite has launched from Cape Canaveral, Florida on top of a Boeing Delta 2 rocket. The government is now competing with Europe's Galileo system, and has added two additional military channels and one civilian channel, which will increase the accuracy and performance of GPS - as well as increase its resistance to jamming."
Its about time (Score:3, Insightful)
How do you compete with vaporware (Galileo)? (Score:5, Insightful)
Lets see :
Galileo has not launched yet.
Galileo will not be free.
The 2R-M was planning before Galileo was anounced.
Galileo operational capibility is not planned until 2008.
I'm failing to see the link to the vaporware...
which # (Score:2, Insightful)
Just curious...it would be fun to know when i turn on my GPS receiver.
Re:Look everyone! Somone who didn't RTFA! (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Jamming by whom? (Score:5, Insightful)
Problem with active GPS jamming is that it's a "damned if you do, damned if you don't" situation. Any sort of active jamming on the battle field is a huge beacon on the battlefield screaming BLOW ME UP! It then becomes a question of whether or not to turn on the jammer at all, as at most it'll be good for slightly de-accurizing (if that's not a word, it ought to be) one bombing run before being obliterated. If they were cheap enough, maybe, but even still...
Re:Look everyone! Somone who didn't RTFA! (Score:5, Insightful)
The other thing to keep in mind is that there are many things that contribute to the total spacecraft mass in addition to the electronics. Not all of them have undergone the same kind of Moore's law reductions in mass (or improvements in capability) that electronics have.
Re:You Will Be Assimilated! (Score:3, Insightful)
Given the military nature of the project, perhaps it is just a "PR model" for secrecy.
Re:Its about time (Score:2, Insightful)
Same reasoning (sorta) applies to GPS. Why throw away a $100,000,000 satellite when it hasn't died yet?
The newer satellites do have some expanded capabilities, but don't plan on seeing those operationally for 5 to 8 years. (It's a long story of governmental mismanagment and strife)
Re:You Will Be Assimilated! (Score:4, Insightful)
These reasons apply to US government space programs. For an alternative approach, you might look at Surrey Satellite Technologies Ltd [sstl.co.uk] in the UK. They build and launch things quickly, have a well-defined strategy for integrating new technologies into spacecraft in a low-risk fashion and getting rapid flight-test information on them, make good use of the technologies appropriate to a mission instead of getting wedded to any one tech, and are extremely good at nailing down their requirements and building only what is needed. IMHO they are the best, and most innovative satellite manufacturer in the world today (and no, I don't work for them - although I'd do so in a heartbeat if I ever moved to the UK).
To being things slighly back on-topic, it's probably worth noting that SSTL has the contract to develop a testbed satellite [sstl.co.uk] for the Galileo system (the European competitor to GPS).