Become a fan of Slashdot on Facebook

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Science Technology

Making Ice Without Electricity 608

j-beda writes "Time Magazine is running an article telling us how Dave Williams is trying to make ice for third-world applications using the Hilsch-Ranque vortex-tube effect (first developed in 1930 by G.J. Ranque), where swirling air is split into hot and cold components." The method is horribly inefficient but Williams is hoping it could yield helpful results in areas where electricity is really not an option.
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Making Ice Without Electricity

Comments Filter:
  • by SiliconEntity ( 448450 ) on Monday September 12, 2005 @04:09PM (#13540524)
    How can you rotate anything without moving parts?

    The gas moves into the chamber under pressure. The chamber is shaped to send the gas into a whirling vortex. Then the hot molecules go one way and the cold ones go the other. But I think it takes very high pressures to produce the required speeds.
  • I read TFA, and... (Score:5, Informative)

    by arhines ( 620963 ) on Monday September 12, 2005 @04:10PM (#13540529) Homepage
    ... Time really needs to get its story straight with regards to scientific reporting. This method is a) not innovative b) not practical and c) REQUIRES SIGNIFICANT ENERGY INPUT. Vortex tubes have been around forever, and they are not some form of perpetual motion. It is a well-understood effect, and one which does not violate any of thermodynamics. You put in a lot of energy via compressed air, and get output in the form of a thermal differential. The key point is that you need a lot of high pressure input...where is this going to come from? Electricity. Unless you use a combustion engine to turn the crank on a compressor, in which case that's your energy source. What are villagers in rural india going to do? Blow really hard through the tube?
  • What's the big deal? (Score:3, Informative)

    by Gigabit Switchman ( 16654 ) <drew.vanzandt@gmBLUEail.com minus berry> on Monday September 12, 2005 @04:15PM (#13540583) Homepage
    Why try to develop something entirely new, with the resulting time and money requirements? A few solar cells + Peltier coolers + some insulation and an ice tray. Yes, Peltiers are inefficient... but they're solid-state, at least, which I think ought to do for remote areas as far as durability. I would think you could assemble a decent mini-freezer out of things portable enough to carry anywhere:

    1) Flexible solar panels (less efficient but more portable than glass)
    2) A handful of Peltiers... they're pretty small
    3) A couple of cans of "Great Stuff" spray-in insulation, or cans of A-B component expanding insulation

    One of my friends went to Peru to assemble a non-electric solar water purifier, and anything they couldn't carry on their backs on 30-mile-a-day hikes for a week didn't go. Now that's a design constraint!
  • by Anonymous Coward on Monday September 12, 2005 @04:18PM (#13540606)
    Or maybe it does.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Einstein_Refrigerator [wikipedia.org]

    No moving parts.

    Uses amonia, butane, and water...
  • Re:Dr. Brown (Score:2, Informative)

    by petabyte ( 238821 ) on Monday September 12, 2005 @04:19PM (#13540616)
    Ok, not to be pedantic, but it was 1885 - you know, 100 years before the first movie which was 1985.

    He also perfected that machine that made breakfast automatically in the morning which was a mess when he tried it in 1985.

    Oh and yeah, a time machine powered by steam but thats the only part of the movie I didn't find plausable ...
  • Full article (Score:3, Informative)

    by nstrom ( 152310 ) on Monday September 12, 2005 @04:26PM (#13540691)
    The full article seems to be available in the print-only version here:
    http://www.time.com/time/magazine/printout/0,8816, 1101299,00.html [time.com]

    You're not missing much, though -- I'm guessing this one was a sidebar blurb, as it's only two paragraphs anyways.
  • by chill ( 34294 ) on Monday September 12, 2005 @04:28PM (#13540715) Journal
    The Romans used to make ice in the deserts of Palestine and North Africa. It seems to me they were around before electricity and Frigidaire.

    http://www.madsci.org/posts/archives/nov99/9417235 40.Sh.r.html [madsci.org]

    Of course, the large temperature difference between the day and night in the desert it what drives it. That method probably won't work in tropical climates.

      -Charles
  • Re:Dr. Brown (Score:3, Informative)

    by OverlordQ ( 264228 ) on Monday September 12, 2005 @04:29PM (#13540718) Journal
    No the time machine wasn't powered by steam (if you're referring to BTTF:III), the whole steam loco was used to get the car up to the required 88 miles per hour, not to generate the power for the flux capacitor.
  • Article text (Score:2, Informative)

    by Anonymous Coward on Monday September 12, 2005 @04:30PM (#13540731)
    When he isn't snowboarding or volunteering for Engineers Without Borders, Dave Williams spends his days thinking about something most of us take for granted: ice. As he discovered on a volunteer trip to Haiti in 2002, ice can be a godsend to a poor village, keeping fish fresh on a journey to market or preserving vaccines. But how do you make it without electricity, without access to coolants like Freon or fuels like propane? Williams, 26, knew that forcing compressed air through a hole in the middle of a pipe causes hot and cold air to flow from opposite ends, a phenomenon known as the Ranque-Hilsch vortex-tube effect. No one is quite sure how the separation works, but feed the cold air into a container, he reasoned, and you would have an icemaker and a freezer, which would have zero operating costs and would be environmentally friendly, since it wouldn't require chemicals and the jet of air could be generated via a compressor powered by wind, water, man or animal.

    At least that was the idea. Tinkering with heat-transfer equations, Williams tried to determine how much energy it would take to yield a block of ice. "It had been a while since I'd done real math problems. I had to break out the old textbook," says Williams, a product-development consultant with his own firm, Dissigno, in San Francisco. After eons of number crunching, he hit on the right formula and built a prototype. It isn't very efficient; his device uses 35 times as much energy as an electric fridge to make 1 kg of ice. But its simplicity could yield a killer app in Third World villages, where Williams hopes aid groups will distribute his icemaker as an economic-development tool. He aims to field-test it in Haiti later this year. --By Daren Fonda. Reported by Matt Smith/New York

  • Re:Make or Sell? (Score:1, Informative)

    by Anonymous Coward on Monday September 12, 2005 @04:30PM (#13540732)
    This has already been dealt with in a semi-cost-effective manner:

    http://www.homepower.com/files/solarice.pdf?search =solar%20ice [homepower.com]

    The article is a bit dated, so the costs are undoubtedly off, but it's got to be one of the lowest cost solutions for this particular problem.
  • by Cyclotron_Boy ( 708254 ) on Monday September 12, 2005 @04:34PM (#13540770) Homepage
    For those who didn't read TFA, and haven't ever read about the operation of these devices, Tim Cockerill [cockerill.net] wrote his thesis [cockerill.net] about them. He provides an excellent reference for the thermodynamic operation of these devices. You can put down your tinfoil hats, as they do obey classical thermodynamics perfectly well.
  • by dwight0 ( 513303 ) on Monday September 12, 2005 @04:34PM (#13540773) Homepage
    here is a picture of one. it makes it easier to see how it works.
    HERE [google.com]
  • by Sialagogue ( 246874 ) <sialagogue@gm[ ].com ['ail' in gap]> on Monday September 12, 2005 @04:42PM (#13540856)

    Or, we have found First and Second Prize winners in the "Talk out your ass without knowing anything" game.

    If either one of you had bothered to look into this device for even a moment, oh I don't know, maybe here [cockerill.net] for example, you'd know that they aren't spinning anything at a million RPM. It is a device that has no moving parts. Basically, and I'll boil it down for you, you blow in one end and two streams come out, one hotter and one colder. It's the vortex inside that can reach a million RPM.

    If you can find a way (and this, I assume, is what he's still working on) to get enough air through it then you can get the cold stream very cold indeed, which is useful.

    I've never been to anywhere that qualifies as Third-World, but I assume that simple is better. With no moving parts this is as simple as it gets, if a way can be found to get enough gas through it. Perhaps it's wind, or volcanic gases, or storing composting gas, or simply the hot air generated by your armchair engineering, the point is that he's looking into it to try to help people, and you didn't look into it and are helping no one.

  • by DaoudaW ( 533025 ) on Monday September 12, 2005 @04:54PM (#13540965)
    Back when I lived in an African village, 1989-92, we had a kerosene refrigerator. All I had to do was trim the wick occasionally and keep feeding it fossil fuel and it kept things cold/frozen for me. A co-worker of mine in another location converted his to burn butane by putting a bunsen burner in place of the kerosene wick.

    Although we certainly used our fridge for food and ice, it was also very important to refrigerate meds for the clinic in our village.
  • by Rauser ( 631244 ) on Monday September 12, 2005 @05:06PM (#13541069)
    My company cools electronics enclosures in hazardous locations (oil refineries, etc.) with vortex cooling. [exair.com] These coolers are commercially available and work great, but they consume a lot of compressed air. They don't have any moving parts either. I used to conduct field trials in Sardinia, Texas and Louisiana a few years back and we always used to keep bottled water frosty cold using the cooler in our controls cabinet. Great when you've been standing around on the tarmac all day with an external temperature in the high 90's.
  • by Idarubicin ( 579475 ) on Monday September 12, 2005 @05:21PM (#13541217) Journal
    really ? so where do the impurities go ? thin air ? i guess those (Art/Antart)ic scientists are wasting their time looking at ice cores if those impurities just dissapear when you freeze water

    1. A freeze/thaw cycle kills many (not all) microorganisms--ice crystals shred cell membranes, and freezing can mangle the protein coat on viruses. A number of tropical parasitic organisms aren't well adapted to the cold, either.

    2. You can remove some dissolved chemical contaminants if you don't freeze all the water. As water freezes, the assembly of regular ice crystals tends to force impurities out into the remaining liquid. If you stop after you've frozen four-fifths of the water, then you can throw out that last twenty percent that contains the concentrated contaminants. Ice that forms on bodies of salt water is almost pure water, because the salt is driven into the liquid phase by the freezing process.

  • by Anonymous Coward on Monday September 12, 2005 @05:25PM (#13541251)
    I think he meant that the army is forcing people to stay inside the city instead of walking off to a nearby town where they can look for their own safety.

  • Re:Hrm. (Score:5, Informative)

    by stienman ( 51024 ) <adavis.ubasics@com> on Monday September 12, 2005 @06:06PM (#13541629) Homepage Journal
    From a section on the solar funnel cooker [solarcooking.org] website:

    ------
    In September 1999, we placed two funnels out in the evening, with double-bagged jars inside. One jar was on a block of wood and the other was suspended in the funnel using fishing line. The temperature that evening (in Provo, Utah) was 78 F. Using a Radio Shack indoor/outdoor thermometer, a BYU student (Colter Paulson) measured the temperature inside the funnel and outside in the open air. He found that the temperature of the air inside the funnel dropped quickly by about 15 degrees, as its heat was radiated upwards in the clear sky. That night, the minimum outdoor air temperature measured was 47.5 degrees - but the water in both jars had ICE. I invite others to try this, and please let me know if you get ice at 55 or even 60 degrees outside air temperature (minimum at night). A black PVC container may work even better than a black-painted jar, since PVC is a good infrared radiator - these matters are still being studied.

    I would like to see the "Funnel Refrigerator" tried in desert climates, especially where freezing temperatures are rarely reached. It should be possible in this way to cheaply make ice for Hutus in Rwanda and for aborigines in Australia, without using any electricity or other modern "tricks." We are in effect bringing some of the cold of space to a little corner on earth. Please let me know how this works for you.
    ------

    This is an experiment you can conduct yourself. It may be that without advanced insulation (maybe straw wasn't enough?) one couldn't obtain ice in the desert, but given good modern materials the physics suggests that it would work well.

    -Adam
  • by lgw ( 121541 ) on Monday September 12, 2005 @06:29PM (#13541815) Journal
    First of all, the states asked for aid, and Bush signed a state of emergency, BEFORE Katrina hit. There was no question about authority. FEMA and the federal government had all the authority and responsibility in this situation.

    That's not how the system is set up. FEMA had authority to act, but only where specifically requested to act by state government. The governer can call of FEMA for help with any problem state and local responders can't handle, but FEMA can't act except where specific help is requested. What *usually* happens is that the state EMA says "command and control is something we can't handle, please take that over", and FEMA does, allowing them to use their own initiative. This did *not* happen in LA, and still hasn't happened.

    Also, using the national guard for policing (which was desperately needed) is outside of FEMA entirely unless the president invokes the insurrection act, which would have been a very scary precedent! The governer must effectively deputize the guardsmen, as there is no martial law in the LA constitution. The governer must also directly request guardsmen from other states (they were offered, bu not requested).

    Basically, Blanco refused to give up control to people who actually had a plan. It takes more than just declaring a state of emergency (which is a prerequisite), you also have to *explicitly* relinquish command and control to FEMA if you want them to run the show.
  • Re:Hrm. (Score:5, Informative)

    by stienman ( 51024 ) <adavis.ubasics@com> on Monday September 12, 2005 @06:52PM (#13542016) Homepage Journal
    There are several ways to move heat energy. The method being demonstrated here is infrared radiation. All things radiate and accept radiant infrared [wikipedia.org] heat, which is slightly different than infrared light.

    All other things being equal, if an object is absorbing more infrared heat radiation than it is releasing, then it gains heat. This one of the forms of radiation the sun puts out that heats the earth's surface (though lots of radiation is harmlessly bounced off the atmosphere or converted before it reaches the ground).

    Since the clear night sky contributes little radiation to the earth the earth's surface radiates and cools off more quickly than it heats up. By using reflectors one can increase the surface area of the radiation and gain greater cooling, just as solar collectors with reflectors can gain greater energy with the sun shining on them.

    -Adam
  • by Anonymous Coward on Monday September 12, 2005 @07:12PM (#13542178)
    http://www.dhs.gov/dhspublic/interapp/editorial/ed itorial_0566.xml [dhs.gov]

    "When an incident or potential incident is of such severity, magnitude, and/or complexity that it is considered an Incident of National Significance, the Secretary of Homeland Security initiates actions to prepare for, respond to, and recover from the incident." (NHP, 15)

    "The President leads the Nation in responding efficiently and ensuring the necessary resources are applied quickly and effectively to all Incidents of National Significance." (NHP, 15)

    "Standard procedures regarding requests for assistance may be expedited, or under extreme circumstances, suspended in the immediate aftermath of an event of catastrophic magnitude." (NRP, 44)

  • by Liam Slider ( 908600 ) on Monday September 12, 2005 @09:12PM (#13542971)
    And in conservative America, everyone likes to pretend that class and race are distinct issues.

    Oh yes, everyone knows that in America only "black" people are poor, and all rich people are "white."

    There were times, as a child, when I was sleeping on the floor in a run down house with many other people, that was how I lived. Kids' showers were shared to save on the water bill. Food was as often provided by charity as by purchase. I was lucky to even have a few small toys. Here's the shocker for you....I'm "white." There are plenty of poor "white" people out there, I know, I've seen them, lived among them, been one of them.

    And there are a fair number of rich "black" people as well.And no, not all of them in sports

    Class and race are different issues. The people who do not see that, who say that they are one...well, they are both racist and ignorant.

  • by cosmic_0x526179 ( 209008 ) on Monday September 12, 2005 @09:19PM (#13543017)
    First of all, the states asked for aid, and Bush signed a state of emergency, BEFORE Katrina hit. There was no question about authority. FEMA and the federal government had all the authority and responsibility in this situation.

    well, apparently, yes and no. The state controls the guard, and any national troops deployed report to the guard it would seem. I found this interesting tidbit on nola.com

    Following the meeting on Air Force One, the White House sent Blanco a proposed memorandum of understanding late Friday night that she was urged to sign right away, according to the governor. The memo would have taken the rare step of putting Honore in charge of both the Guardsmen and the active-duty military units while answering to both the president and Blanco, known in the military as dual-reporting.


    But Blanco, after meetings by her staff that consumed much of Friday night and Saturday morning, declined to sign the memo and opted to preserve her authority of the Guard forces, which by then numbered more than 13,000. Blanco said she did not want to undermine the authority of Maj. Gen. Bennett Landreneau, who heads the Louisiana National Guard and oversees the Guard troops who have arrived from other states.

    "The problem with the offer (to federalize) was that when the question was asked, 'How does this make things better?' the question was never answered," said one state official who attended meetings about the issue but asked to remain anonymous because he does not have authority to speak for the governor.

    One way of looking at this was that it was a power-grab by the federal government, but I'm not so sure. Apparently the feds had one reason for requesting this, and Blanco (and her staff) had their own reasons for refusing it.

  • by wowbagger ( 69688 ) on Monday September 12, 2005 @09:55PM (#13543174) Homepage Journal
    "The ammonia does not boil.... Ammonia and water are boiled in the boiler ..."

    You might want to be a little more careful not to contradict yourself when "correcting" somebody.

    The total system pressure sets the temperature at which the boiler will have to run to boil the ammonia/water solution - so to use a low grade heat source you would have to run a lower system pressure in order to allow the low grade heat to boil the mix and run the cycle.

This file will self-destruct in five minutes.

Working...