Earth Departure Movie From MESSENGER Spacecraft 193
A reader writes:"The Mercury-bound MESSENGER spacecraft took 358 images during a gravity assist swingby of Earth on Aug. 2, 2005.
Those images were sequenced into an MPEG movie showing the view from MESSENGER as it departed Earth."
Mirror (Score:5, Informative)
And as always... Slashdotted into Oblivion. (Score:5, Informative)
Mirror (Score:2, Informative)
un /.'ed version (Score:5, Informative)
-Sean (OutdoorDB [outdoordb.org] - The Outdoor Wiki
BitTorrent! (Score:4, Informative)
http://puffin.tamucc.edu/~mwilliamson/torrents/mdi s_depart.mpeg.mpa.mpg.torrent [tamucc.edu]
Re:Slashdotted already? (Score:3, Informative)
I just pulled the mpeg in at 600k/s, not bad for a 5 meg file on the front page of Slashdot.
Cool video. It's a keeper. Just gotta keep reminding yourself that it's real, not SFX.
Re:Impressive! (Score:4, Informative)
The movie starts when MESSENGER was 40,761 miles (65,598 kilometers) above South America on Aug. 2. It ends when the probe was 270,847 miles (435,885 kilometers) away from Earth - farther than the Moon's orbit - on Aug. 3.
Looking at the mpeg with the timestamps, it was pretty much exactly (8mins out) 24 hours, so that makes it travelling at an average speed of roughly 4.29 km/s.
Stop whining, use greasemonkey (Score:2, Informative)
Script [dunck.us] to auto add mirrordot and coralcache links to stories.
Seriously, stop whining and take matters into your own hands.
Re:Interesting (Score:3, Informative)
Also, while most cloud formations are not in the light long enough to see real change, one formation does appear to dissipate before hitting the terminator.
This appears to be quite real.
Re:maybe you're rtight? is this fake? (Score:5, Informative)
I think calculating a 23-degree angle with absolutely no point of reference would be a bit of a challenge (it assumes the probe's camera is aligned to the solar ecliptic, which is pretty unlikely.)
I think the problem is that most photos are very close and pretty much with the sun behind the photographer. Another good indication that this was real instead of animated - the complete lack of stars. Astronauts have commented that the reflected sunlight off of the earth completely drowns out the background stars - in other words, reality looks fake because it doesn't resemble the fake reality Hollywood has taught us to expect.
Re:collision 27th frame from end (Score:5, Informative)
Any meteor big enough to be visible from that far away would have been noticed by a LOT of people.
There is a nice flash over southern Africa when the Sun's specular highlight hits lake Tangaynika, though.
Background info on this video (Score:5, Informative)
Wrong aspect ratio with mplayer (Score:3, Informative)
If you watch this with mplayer (at least version 1.0pre7), it will wrongly assume that the aspect ratio is 4:3. Just use the -noaspect option.
I don't know whose fault this is, but I suspect that the movie is badly encoded.
Re:Well, the Earth is here, but... (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Underwhelmed (Score:3, Informative)
1) The Voyager probes were launched 9 years after 2001 came out.
2) Kubrick wasn't happy with the look of the effects of Saturn produced by Doug Trumbell so the destination was switched to Jupiter.
3) Doug got better at producing Saturn imagery and used it in "Silent Running".