Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Robotics Science

Remote-Controlled Robots Explore 'Lost City' 147

Roland Piquepaille writes "A large team of oceanographers is again exploring 'Lost City,' an hydrothermal vent field located in the middle of the Atlantic Ocean, which was discovered in 2000 and named like this because of the myth of Atlantis. But this time, the oceanographers are not on a ship. Most of them are in a room at the University of Washington in Seattle. And according to this article from the Seattle Post-Intelligencer, they're using high-speed Internet connections to control robotic vehicles exploring the deep Atlantic Ocean thousands of miles away. Thanks to satellites, the remotely operated vehicles (ROVs) Argus and Hercules can transmit videos back to Seattle in real time. After analysis, the scientists can move the ROVs to specific areas of interest without having their feet wet. Read more for other details, references and pictures about this project."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Remote-Controlled Robots Explore 'Lost City'

Comments Filter:
  • by ReformedExCon ( 897248 ) <reformed.excon@gmail.com> on Wednesday August 03, 2005 @03:16AM (#13228866)
    I am not sure I can agree with your position, though I agree with your sentiment. I don't think I implied that robots ought to be shunned in favor of sending humans to do a job. Robots indeed have their place, as do computers, calculators, and every other technology that makes exploring and researching more fruitful. But I do not think that technology is the be-all and end-all in science. It may be helpful to overcome barriers, but at the core it is humans who must make the final fateful decisions. And a human who is on-site can make a better snap decision than one who is away in a laboratory staring at a video monitor with a 3 second delay between his commands and the robot's actions.

    I understand your unwillingness to want to pay for such "extravagancies". Just as you don't want to pad some scientist's budget, I perhaps do not want to pad some artist's funding. However, a government that works best is one that helps the society it governs progress with as little human suffering as possible and at the lowest cost to its citizens. As such, I have to think that it would be far more proper to have informed people making the decision as to how to spend allocated funds rather than trusting each citizen to specifically designate where each penny of their taxes goes. Universities have a much better perspective than the common layperson when it comes to scientific research, and I think it ought to be they who make the decision as to how to spend allocated government funds.

    Science is absolutely about adventure and excitement. It is the excitement of discovering something new, of finding something that no one has ever found before, of creating something that no one has ever created before. Science is about getting "out there" and finding stuff. It sustains itself with people who are excited about finding stuff. You can't take that away and give it to the robots and expect to have scientists lining up to fill the labs forever.
  • Re:go UW (Score:2, Interesting)

    by Danger Stevens ( 869074 ) on Wednesday August 03, 2005 @04:37AM (#13229034) Homepage
    Seriously, the UW has some bragging rights. The 'Cyclotron Shop' in north campus boasts the most powerful electromagnet on the west coast. It's powerful enough that one of the standard physics projects is to watch it levitate frogs in midair.

    Glad to see they keep trying new things.
  • by ianscot ( 591483 ) on Wednesday August 03, 2005 @11:38AM (#13230862)
    I'm one of the few people it seems that feels there is more information to be learned from our own vastly uncharted seas than far reaches of space.

    Is that you, Timothy Dalton? Are you still reading from the narrative script for "Deep Blue"?

    Don't fret too much. The military's been lavishing huge money (example: Glomar Explorer) on the ocean for the entirety of the cold war. Now that we've won that war (and are fighting its non-oceanic dregs and ghosts in the form of OBL, Saddam H. and so on) the potential civilian and scientific uses of all that technology are getting tried out in a big way. Robert Ballard's Mediterranean shipwreck dives were done with the little Navy submersibles, for one example among a whole lot of them. The Russian mini subs are available for hire, and so on.

    This is a sort of golden age for shipwrecks and deep sea exploration. It's happening, and there's a lot of cross-benefits between space and the ocean. To wit: this story, or the MBARI cabled submersibles that Bruce Robison uses, juxtaposed with the Mars rovers. Benthic exploratino faces some of the same choices space exploration does. (Do we need to send people down to the Challenger Deep, or remote vehicles?)

    These aren't mutually exclusive options at all.

All seems condemned in the long run to approximate a state akin to Gaussian noise. -- James Martin

Working...