Shuttle Discovery Lifts Off 445
An anonymous reader writes "CNN is reporting that the Space Shuttle Discovery has lifted off, marking the United States' returned to manned space flight for the first time since the Columbia disaster in February 2003"
Torrent of HD stream? (Score:2, Interesting)
Camera Views (Score:5, Interesting)
Incredible! (Score:4, Interesting)
The footage on Nasa TV was the best I've ever seen, keep it up Nasa - Fantastic work!
A toast! (Score:5, Interesting)
To Apollo One!
To Challenger!
To Columbia!
To all those we have lost in the pursuit of human understanding and knowledge!
Long live exploration!
Long live science!
Long live Earth!
LONG LIVE.... DISCOVERY!
Liftoff! (Score:3, Interesting)
I wonder.. (Score:4, Interesting)
I wonder if the amount of $$ being spent on running the current space shuttle program is worth it.. or if that money would be better spent in not going to space for the next 5 to 10 years and developing something to replace the current shuttle program.
Even after all the precautions, there were still NASA employees crying foul at today's launch date - which raises the question, "What will it take to convince all NASA employees so the general public can be then convinced to fully back this program?"
Best of luck to the current crew. Hope they fly high and land safely.
Aviation And Space Geeks Rejoice... (Score:3, Interesting)
Pity X-Plane won't simulate the launch... or the ISS, but oh well.
Re:MSNBC Commentator is a jackass (Score:2, Interesting)
the german commentator i was listening to was having a great time detailing every single computer-state change down to the launch and even until SSRB detach
great that discovery is off. gonna hold my breath until the chutes' deployed and the handbrakes on, however
My fingers are crossed... (Score:3, Interesting)
Digressing...
I can still vividly recall the Challenger disaster vividly. I was in highschool in NH. Not the one Christa McAuliffe was from, but then NH is a small state so everybody was psyched. A friend told me he heard about the explosion on the radio. We listened for a little while before going to the cafeteria for lunch. One of the women serving lunch asked if I was ok (I guess I looked really pale) and I told her what had happened. She chuckled & said I must be joking. I snapped back at her, and I still remember it clearly: "Do you have a radio in here? Then turn it on!", then left. When I came back for more food a little while later they did have a radio on and she was incredibly apologetic. That's one of those days I'll probably remember for the rest of my life.
Re:MSNBC Commentator is a jackass (Score:5, Interesting)
I was watching HDNet's coverage before heading out to work - I can't wait to get home and watch the actual launch in HD (it's DVR'd). I did take note of the overall tone of the coverage, though, which was great - very little commentary at all, mostly just a run-down of what was happening at any given time. The goal was to inform, not to editorialize, and there was obviously no pressure to "fill in the gaps" left by silence. It really almost gave you a feeling of being there.
Their coverage also began about three hours ahead of time, with at least half a dozen HD cameras (a few of their cameras were in SD, unavoidably). You really got to see everything, including the astronauts driving up to the launch pad, then riding up the elevator, suiting up and buckling in. The shots of the launch pad in HD looked really amazing, and I can just imagine what the launch itself looked like. I wish they'd show all launches like this!
Re:I wonder.. (Score:4, Interesting)
I'm not sure what your take is on it. Your second paragraph seems to contradict what you said in the first? Do you think NASA should fire anyone that won't toe the line in regards to the management's talking points? That doesn't sound to productive for an agency with a scientific mission.
What was interesting to me was that during the liftoff, the announcer said something to the effect of (paraphrasing) "We have launch of discovery, starting a new era of american space flight taking us to the moon, mars, and beyond!"
I found that interesting because this shuttle launch, while nice, is not any sort of real step forwards to any of those goals. It's not a big step in terms of technology or procedures. It's another replay of something that was pretty much figured out 25 years ago. It's maybe a small step in public perception of the space program, but that's it. It's a new "era" in space flight only because we're so eager to shut everything down when things go wrong.
I dunno, I'm just rambling now. I get this way when I see so much potential get drowned out in PR and politics, and the space shuttle continues to be an example of this.
Re:A toast! (Score:3, Interesting)
I'm 29 and this is still cool as hell. I'd love to be up there. You, apparently, have lost that sense of amazement. I'd hate to be like that in another four years.
Re:Camera Views (Score:2, Interesting)
It'd be pretty awesome to set up a ring of cameras around the launch and watch it in Matrix-style 'bullet-time'.
Re:MSNBC Commentator is a jackass (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:You know you're a geek when... (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:MSNBC Commentator is a jackass (Score:5, Interesting)
Comment removed (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:MSNBC Commentator is a jackass (Score:3, Interesting)
Even if you only have a two speaker (simple stereo) setup, you can connect the +left and +right wires to the two terminals of one speaker to get the L-R signal, which should be the surround sound, crowd noise. If you connect the +left and +right wires to one terminal of the speaker, and then ground the remaining terminal to -left and -right, you'll get the L+R signal, the commentator.
Disclaimer: if bad things befall your hifi doing this, it's not my fault.
Tom
I disagree. (Score:3, Interesting)
I always hear people saying stuff like, "more powerful computers will allow us to build better aircraft and conquer cancer!!!!!"
The truth is that a faster computer doesn't really give you much more capability, it just delivers that same capability to you faster. It's still people who need to feed the computers the information, and we are limited by our ideas.
If we gave people in the 1940's a supercomputer, it wouldn't really have made their aircraft much different because they didn't even come up with many of the formulas yet. They didn't yet know what breaking the speed of sound would do, or what effect it would have on the plane's control surfaces. They need to discover the principles first, made formulas out of it next, and only then can you feed the formulas into a computer.
Obviously this wouldn't apply if you were comparing a computer that was *so* slow that it couldn't perform the calulations in any decent amount of time, but that doesn't seem to be the case here.
There is only so much that computer calculations can do. They only solve problems that we create.