No Billboards in Space 380
An anonymous reader writes "CNN is reporting that the Federal Aviation Administration proposed Thursday to amend its regulations to ensure that it can enforce a law that prohibits 'obtrusive' advertising in zero gravity." From the article: "For instance, outsized billboards deployed by a space company into low Earth orbit could appear as large as the moon and be seen without a telescope, the FAA said. Big and bright advertisements might hinder astronomers."
The DOT needs to do the same (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Huh? (Score:2, Insightful)
Besides, this is a good thing. It was only a matter of time until somebody started doing it...
Re:Huh? (Score:2, Insightful)
Launch sites. (Score:5, Insightful)
Of course, there's virtually nothing they can do if an LEO craft is launched from some other location and meanders over the U.S. from time to time.
Perhaps they could do something if it were placed in a geostationary orbit over the U.S. but then it wouldn't be in LEO.
Re:Launch sites. (Score:4, Insightful)
Zero gravity? (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:Astronomers?! (Score:5, Insightful)
There'd probably be some significant protesting outside their HQ and whatnot. There would be calls for boycotting, which would probably gain some traction, as people become more and more tired of it.
If some company did it, and it was only visible up there for a few days, they'd get some serious publicity, and if they let it die while it was still a novelty, they'd get mostly good press and an excited public. I'd check a website to find out when it'd be overhead, and then go watch it pass over a few times. Just as long as it doesn't stay long enough to become an eyesore.
After a few of these advertisements happened, it'd cease to be a novelty, and the excitement of seeing one would wear off, and people would turn against them.
That's how I imagine it at least.
Re:Huh? (Score:5, Insightful)
It would be silly to say that the US owns space. That would be like saying that it owns, oh, Iraq. Historically nations have had "ownership" according to how far they can project force. The "three mile limit" for ocean ownership was determined by the range of shore guns. The USSR did not "own" its airspace until it proved that it could shoot down a U2 spy plane.
If the US Air Force succeds in militarizing space, the US may indeed "own" it. That may prove easier than "owning" Iraq.
On a separate topic, it seems to me that a LEO banner would be visible mostly at dusk or dawn. How would it be lit in the middle of the night? Reflection from terrestrial lights maybe, or flourexcent paint?
Blocking progress (Score:3, Insightful)
Religion can't stop suicide, but it can stop stem cell research.
I'm so damn confused.
Won't it be nice when nationalism fades?
Re:The DOT needs to do the same (Score:2, Insightful)
If you're going to die in the line of duty, you want it to be rescuing an infant from a burning hospital, not getting it in the back because Levron lost his favorite hi-tops.
Re:Huh? (Score:5, Insightful)
So yes, if just the US outlaws this, it's silly, but it could be a step toward something more meaningful.
uhhh... Zero Gravity? (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Might?! (Score:4, Insightful)
Pardon, but there's a slightly bigger issue, which is how disgusting the concept is. Photographs of the great outdoors? Brought to you by Nikon and Kodak. Night out camping? Brought to you by Hummer, buy one for your next trip and get there in style. Advertisements will universally become part of the landscape. It's so horrifyingly commercial, it makes me want to throw up. That you wouldn't be able to see Star XYZ is, sorry, rather secondary.
I keep waiting for the backlash, and I never see it. First it was the horizon with billboards. Then product placement (no, it's not a new trend, it's been around since the advent of TV). Then clothing. Most recently, people's bodies. Now we're talking about throwing up giant billboards so that you'll have to go inside to avoid them. Where will we stop? When will the backlash begin?
I've noticed that many "futuristic" movies have had floating advertisements in space/the sky (a few that come to mind- Judge Dread, The Fifth Element, and I believe Blade Runner, to name a few) and I think it was almost intended to get us used to the concept. I seriously hope it backfired, sickening people. I know it made my stomach turn.
Thankfully I think this is one area the conservative right will be with us on- they're probably even more horrified of "God's kingdom" being defiled than we are.
Re:Might?! (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Huh? (Score:2, Insightful)
Meaningful?!?!?! What was the last space ad you saw?!?! Get real. This is just plain old silly.
Now if they were to outlaw the sodium lights, that would be meaningful to astronomers....
B.
Re:Might?! (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:This is just silly. (Score:2, Insightful)
But then, so does subsequent private development of anti-orbital-advertising technology. I wonder how much gunpowder it would take to lob a lead slug to orbital altitude. Doesn't actually need to go into orbit. In fact, it's more likely to do damage if you let the satellite billboard come to it.
Of course, one slug wouldn't do it. You'd need the equivalent of grape shot to have a significant effect.
Re:Disc-shaped ads... (Score:1, Insightful)
Re:The DOT needs to do the same (Score:2, Insightful)
curvy roads keep our attention.
Re:Huh? (Score:2, Insightful)
Blade Runner (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Huh? (Score:3, Insightful)
Perhaps the US cannot unilaterally legislate "no billboards in space," but we can say, "nothing advertised in space may be sold in the US" which may be effective enough.
Astronomers aren't my greatest concern. The fact is, looking straight up into the sky is about the *only* place to escape advertising these days. I hope future civilizations are able to pull back advertising from the ridiculous extremes to which we have taken it. They will look back on us and conclude, rightly, that our central guiding principle was branding.
Re:Huh? (Score:4, Insightful)
- I wasn't aware that the US owned space. -
Wow, even when we propose keeping space clean, you just can't pass up the chance to do a little US-bashing, can you?
Heheh. Yeah, you are right. Over the last years the US has been such a formidable world-citizen that that comment was certainly uncalled for.
I'm sure the US will try everything it can to keep space clean. From non-US stuff. *ducks*