Scientific American Gives Up 523
IvyMike writes "The April issue Scientific American opens with a Perspectives column titled Okay, We Give Up. It opens, 'For years, helpful letter writers told us to stick to science. They pointed out that science and politics don't mix. They said we should be more balanced in our presentation of such issues as creationism, missile defense and global warming. We resisted their advice and pretended not to be stung by the accusations that the magazine should be renamed Unscientific American, or Scientific Unamerican, or even Unscientific Unamerican. But spring is in the air, and all of nature is turning over a new leaf, so there's no better time to say: you were right, and we were wrong.'"
Time for a new Slashdot Poll (Score:2, Interesting)
- Funny
- Unfunny
- April what?
- What do you mean Paris Hilton really isn't going to advertise for Linux!?!
Re:Okay, We Give Up (Score:5, Interesting)
In the other direction you have Discover (which continues to move south). It is even cheaper a year then SciAm. I think it is only a matter of time before G4 buys them and merges game content into the already fluffy content.
Takeover notice (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:BBC article on creationism (Score:3, Interesting)
Mostly they're in it for selling their own line of books, videos, etc. for which they make a pretty penny.
I had to steward for one of their conferences... they told us that they were going to get over 1000 people, and we setup for that many. 50 turned up.. I felt embarassed for the speakers.
Really they're just a fringe group, even amongst the christian groups.
Re:Giggles. (Score:2, Interesting)
Scientific theory is what is taught in science class. I went to a catholic school where we were taught science (gravity, evolution, electromagnetism, etc) and creationism... *DIFFERENT* creation stories (they're stories not theories) - we all had to come up with one - I got an A+
It's been a long time since most people around here, who can reliably spell "science", believed in the literal truth of the stories in genesis.
Re:sigh (Score:3, Interesting)
See this link for just one source of inflation numbers:
http://inflationdata.com/Inflation/Inflation_Rate
There are hundreds more.
Re:Creationism, Environment, etc. (Score:3, Interesting)
Oh, I'm not trying to, which is why I said "religious fanatics," not "religious believers." Most of the faithful I know are perfectly sane people; but as SmallOak pointed out, here in the US, it's the far-right fanatics who shout the loudest, and they've been frighteningly successful in co-opting "faith" as a code word for their brand of extremism. Given that we are and will almost certainly remain a majority Christian country, the only way to turn this around, IMO, is for believers who object to their belief being used solely to advance an extreme agenda to stand up and say, "Not in our name." I see some signs of this happening, but not nearly fast enough.
Re:Nice. (Score:3, Interesting)