Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Space Science

Asteroid To Be Naked-Eye Visible In 2029 240

An anonymous reader writes "SPACE.com is reporting that asteroid 2004 MN4 will fly so close to Earth in 2029 that it'll be visible to the naked eye. Other than barely-visible Vesta, this is a first. And 2004 MN4 will be about magnitude 3.3 -- like a dim but easily visible star. A moving star in this case. You might remember 2004 MN4 is the one that sparked worry, in December, that it would hit Earth. No worries, NASA says, just a once-in-a-millennium sky show."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Asteroid To Be Naked-Eye Visible In 2029

Comments Filter:
  • by Anonymous Coward on Friday February 04, 2005 @08:01PM (#11578407)
    If we put together a mission, any chance we can park it at one of the Lagrange points?
  • Plan now (Score:5, Interesting)

    by tqft ( 619476 ) <`moc.oohay' `ta' `ua_sworrubnai'> on Friday February 04, 2005 @08:03PM (#11578429) Homepage Journal
    what do we want to land on it?

    Large stable platform.

    Within Earth orbit (mostly).

    A (radio?) telescope?
  • by reporter ( 666905 ) on Friday February 04, 2005 @08:07PM (#11578470) Homepage
    This new asteroid actually provides an excellent opportunity to test some of our anti-asteroid proposals. They are intended to prevent an asteroid from actually colliding with earth. This new asteroid will not collide with earth but would provide an opportunity to test anti-asteroid technologies.

    Two ideas to test in 2029 are (1) dumping a bunch of white paint on the asteroid from a passing nuclear-powered interplanetary missile and (2) 1 week later, detonate a nuclear warhead loaded on another interplanetary missile that will fly close to but will not impact said asteroid. We had better test these ideas on a safe asteroid instead of waiting for the day when an asteroid aimed at earth actually arrives.

    Given the fact that engineering is not perfect, if we do not actually test these anti-asteroid technologies in advance, then we run the high risk of failure when we use them for the 1st time on an actual asteroid destined for earth. To my knowledge, very few engineering products work correctly on the first try. 'Tis better to be safe than sorry.

  • by Sheetrock ( 152993 ) on Friday February 04, 2005 @08:08PM (#11578484) Homepage Journal
    The northern lights are particularly fascinating, and are visible to about 25% of the Earth with the naked eye during the fall and spring equinoxum -- and take note, a similar phenomenon, referred to as the southern lights, occurs in the lower hemisphere to treat the other 25%.

    There are also shooting stars occurring quite often, more now with the space junk we've got floating up there. And there should be at least two comets, which are effectively luminescent asteroids, visible this year as well.

    Just make sure you get away from light pollution if you want the best opportunity to observe these spectacles. About fifteen minutes in any direction out of town will do, and will make you think seriously about more serious astrology (you'd be surprised how much can be done with under $1000 of equipment!)

  • light pollution (Score:2, Interesting)

    by mboverload ( 657893 ) on Friday February 04, 2005 @08:11PM (#11578511) Journal
    By the time 2029 comes along, light pollution will remove all detail in the night sky.
  • by Spy der Mann ( 805235 ) <`moc.liamg' `ta' `todhsals.nnamredyps'> on Friday February 04, 2005 @08:14PM (#11578548) Homepage Journal
    Don't push your luck. Look at today's article in Technology Review: "The Ascent of the Robotic Attack Jet" [technologyreview.com] O.o
  • by dabigpaybackski ( 772131 ) on Friday February 04, 2005 @08:33PM (#11578707) Homepage
    Or just put it in an orbit outside the Van Allen belts. A big, rugged space station there would be nice. Somebody get Virgin Galactic on this, or reshuffle the consortium that brought us the International Space Station boondoggle in favor of a truly worthy multinational project that will:

    a. Give us an opportunity to explore techniques for redirecting asteroids.

    b. Provide a test bed for asteroid mining techniques.

    c. Become an orbiting space station.

    d. Promote international cooperation.

  • by adeyadey ( 678765 ) on Friday February 04, 2005 @09:12PM (#11579043) Journal
    Hmm, how much delta-v/rocket fuel to slow up a large asteroid from 17 km/sec to orbital speed.. Quite a lot of fuel/engine is gonna be needed..

    The only "cheap" (in terms of fuel) way of loosing all that velocity I can think of is diverting it so that it skims the Earths atmosphere for aerobraking/capture.. Fancy trying it?
  • Re:Now? (Score:3, Interesting)

    by Captain Nitpick ( 16515 ) on Saturday February 05, 2005 @12:34AM (#11580259)
    Visible to the naked eye... but still a 2% chance of it being rather too visible?

    No.

    The odds of the potential 2029 impact occurring have dropped so close to zero that the event is no longer even considered a long-shot possibility.

Work is the crab grass in the lawn of life. -- Schulz

Working...