Arctic Ozone Hole Will Be Severe This Year 90
dirutz writes "Thought this year's weather patterns were odd? Next year's might be worse because of the thinning of the ozone layer. Looks like there's something to add to that list of New Year's resolutions/hopes/dreams."
Comment removed (Score:1, Insightful)
doesn't matter (Score:4, Insightful)
Earth Speaks To Me (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:poor (Score:3, Insightful)
The fact is, we have no idea exactly what impact we are having on the climate, and anyone who tells you otherwise is either lying or uninformed. The only thing we do know with any confidence is that we are having an impact, but what that might be we just don't know.
RTFA! (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Hmm, this could be a good thing (Score:3, Insightful)
Yeah but until it becomes fashionable for femmes to become geeks, we'll be the last great generation.
Re:Could somebody tell me... (Score:3, Insightful)
Maybe one should do that to the right-wingers.
Oh, they are doing it themselves.
Brace yourself for:
"No consent"
"Not provable"
"Global Cooling"
"Little Ice Age"
"Sun fluctuations"
"Earth has been warmer"
"Earth has been cooler"
Corrolar: "We are in an Ice Age"
"We puny humans have no influence in comparison to the might of earth"
"We mighty humans will handle any problem earth will throw at us"
Re:doesn't matter (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Umm.. What? (Score:3, Insightful)
Where I live (Northwest USA), the ski areas are closed down this winter due to lack of snow. Guess what: local weather varies a lot more than global average temperature. Global warming means global, not local. Your backyard will vary a lot, and that variation tells us very little about the global trend.
http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/snowsports/2 002157838_skiworkers22.html [nwsource.com]
Re:poor (Score:3, Insightful)
I thought we gave up CFC... (Score:1, Insightful)
For those of you who don't know, CFCs are an all-around useful chemical. Not only is it completely harmless to human (save asphyxiation), it retards all kinds of fires instantly. The Navy used to use it on all of their ships to put out fires instantly. Guess what? Since it was deployed. hardly anyone got injured due to fire. Nowadays, fires on our Navy vessels are too common.
CFCs are also extremelty useful as a refrigerant. No other chemical has approached CFCs in this realm. All the newcomers are much more expensive to manufacture, and quite dangerous in their own right.
CFCs are also very heavy. They don't float up to the upper atmosphere as some scientists thought. Instead, they stay down here on the surface of the earth where they cause no harm.
Maybe we should re-examine why we got rid of DDT. Did the condor ever come back after we abolished using it? Insect-borne viruses and diseases sure have. Nothing would've saved so many lives from malaria in the tsunami-stricken region like a good dousing of DDT.