Huygens Probe Lands on Titan 686
WillDraven writes "CNN, NASA and the ESA are reporting that the Huygens space probe has entered the atmosphere of Saturn's moon Titan after traveling 2.2 billion miles. Pictures from the moon's surface should be available sometime this afternoon" according to the NASA TV schedule. What we know so far is that Huygens landed successfully and sent at least the carrier signal from the surface to Cassini for 90+ minutes, more than expected, and that Cassini has successfully repointed at the Earth and begun relaying the data it received, beginning with test packets. Huygens now sits on Titan, silent forever, while we wait to see whether or how much valuable data Cassini obtained and can send back. Update: 01/14 17:20 GMT by M : So far: they report zero lost packets in the transmission, but one of the two independent data-collection systems is apparently giving some problems. Update: 01/14 21:40 GMT by J : The news is pretty much all good: a very successful mission. Expect to see many photos within hours, but for now apparently only three have been released. Ice blocks or rolling stones -- let the debates begin!
Re:Any pics yet? (Score:5, Informative)
Minor explanation (Score:5, Informative)
-F
Re:Regarding the permanent silence of Huygens... (Score:4, Informative)
1.) Its antenna is only strong enough to send signals to cassini, and cassini only 'see' Huygens for so long before it sets over the Titan planet.
2.) Its battery life is very short (because they knew they'd only have such a short time to transmit the data to cassini).
The planet IS harsh (like -290F), but its built to survive it long enough to talk to Cassini until it sets.
GO ESA! (Score:3, Informative)
images to be posted at ... (Score:5, Informative)
http://www.lpl.arizona.edu/%7Ekholso/data.htm [arizona.edu]
Re:First Data Recieved via Cassini! (Score:1, Informative)
Re:Minor explanation (Score:3, Informative)
Re:First Data Recieved via Cassini! (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Regarding the permanent silence of Huygens... (Score:1, Informative)
http://www.aboutdarwin.com/
Re:Congrats to the ESA (Score:5, Informative)
http://www.lpl.arizona.edu/~kholso/test_images.ht
Pretty neat.
Re:Minor explanation (Score:4, Informative)
Re:For the record... (Score:2, Informative)
It's there (Score:1, Informative)
http://www.esa.int/esaCP/SEMQ1QQ3K3E_index_
Re:stupid hippies avoiding danger (Score:3, Informative)
I'm not technically competent to argue the safety risks. I do think the debate is worth engaging, and I definitely think using terms like "stupid hippies" to define those arguing in the opposition helps no one understand the deeper issues. So, your references: the Wikipedia article [wikipedia.org] on plutonium appears to debunk the statement "most toxic sumstances known to man" by comparing plutonium to highly toxic organics like boltulism among others. I assume it's an LD50 comparison.
However, the author(s) note:
--M
Re:So quite posting rants on slashdot... (Score:3, Informative)
You don't? As best I can tell, ceasing all science and exploration efforts doesn't just risk civilization, it dooms it to stagnation and collapse.
So, you have to balance risks, be they personal, financial, or global, against the potential benefits. And in the case of Cassini, the risk was miniscule -- the rtg is designed to survive a launch vehicle failure or reentry without leaking; in fact, rtgs have crashed before (3 of them, I believe), with no leakage. In this case, given that the probability of a problem was very small, the likely result of a problem was far from catastrophic and not even remotely close to your "risking civilization" comment, and the payoff in knowledge gained is likely to be huge, I fully support the mission.
DISR images (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Congrats to the ESA (Score:2, Informative)
Re:stupid hippies avoiding danger (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Regarding the permanent silence of Huygens... (Score:3, Informative)
Not a problem for batteries.
Toys like BQ4852Y [ti.com] can live off its own on-chip battery for 10 years, wake your hardware up anytime inbetween, then provide several essential functionalities to microcontrollers (watchdog, Power On Reset), store data just like RAM except retaining it when external power is missing, and they weight a few grams. So the "main" batteries won't lose any more than their internal leakage until the system wakes up.
Plutonium Toxicity (Score:5, Informative)
Re:stupid hippies avoiding danger (Score:4, Informative)
Right. That's what I'm saying. It IS a gamma [lbl.gov] emitter too.
Re:I've always wondered... (Score:3, Informative)
1) They don't fold out. It looks like a bigger dish you sometimes see on TV vans (I would say 1 to 1.5 meters in diameter). There is a picture on the site above of Cassini with a person standing beside it so you can get a sense of the size.
2) Nuclear. You have this explained in the link above.
3) To communicate with the spacecraft NASA uses the Deep Space Network (DSN) [nasa.gov], which is basically a bunch of large radio tellescopes that are positioned around the Earth so that they cover the whole sky.
4) Don't know about this one so I won't BS.
Planetary Society's blogging from mission control (Score:5, Informative)
I particularly enjoyed this quote from the blog:
He [John Zarnecki, the PI on the Surface Science Package] also said that it looks like the probe lasted about 147 minutes, which is 12 minutes longer than the predicted 135, but is "well within the error bars" of the predictions. However, he said this was still an early result--he didn't want to say for certain, because the members of a team had a bet on, and the number "looked suspiciously like the one I picked," Zarnecki said.
But, when pushed, scientists can't help doing just a little bit of speculating. That's how they work. So here are a couple of little initial tidbits of speculative potential facts that they have mentioned.
Number 1: Since the probe lasted for a really long time, it's "probably a good conclusion" that the probe landed on a solid, not a liquid surface, Lebreton said when he was pushed. Of course, that doesn't rule out John Zarnecki's "squelchy" surface prediction.
Number 2: One thing that may have helped the probe last a long time was that it appeared to stay unexpectedly warm. At an elevation of only 50 kilometers (about 30 miles) above the surface, her interior was still at a balmy 25 C (77 F), despite the outside temperature being a frigid -180 C (-290 F). Lebreton wasn't ready to say what this might mean. It could be overperformance of the spacecraft, but it could also mean a wide variety of unexpected things about the atmosphere. For those of you who like instant results, I think you'll be disappointed on an answer to this question, because after all Huygens was a mission focused almost entirely on Titan's atmosphere, so it's going to take a very long time to synthesize scientific conclusions from all of this.
Re:concern about signal quality (Score:2, Informative)
Link (Score:3, Informative)
http://planetary.org/news/2005/huygens_blog.html [planetary.org]
Blog address (Score:4, Informative)
Thanks for the info though I did not know the blog existed, and it's always fun to get more intimate details than news reports or press releases can provide.
First picture released! (Score:4, Informative)
CNN has initial pictures (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Planetary Society's blogging from mission contr (Score:1, Informative)
Images available (Score:2, Informative)
Some images are now available here [arizona.edu]!
First photo from the surface!!! (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Pathetic! (Score:2, Informative)
Thank Boris Smeds (Score:3, Informative)
Titan Calling [ieee.org] How a Swedish engineer saved a once-in-a-lifetime mission to Saturn's mysterious moon (by James Oberg)
Without this guy, things would have gone a lot differently! I found this article in RISKS digest 23.65 (always worth a read).