NASA To Get 10,240 Node Itanium 2 Linux Cluster 249
starwindsurfer writes "US space agency Nasa is to get a massive supercomputing boost to help get its shuttle missions back in action after the 2003 shuttle disaster. Project Columbia, a collaboration with two technology giants, will mean Nasa's computing power will be ramped up by 10 times to do complex simulations."
Tax payer. (Score:4, Interesting)
Also, why is the BBC the first news tidbit about NASA's new supercomputer?
Re:What Would SCO's Take Be Worth? (Score:3, Interesting)
I wonder if this is a Monday phenomenon? I wonder what the distribution of 'Funny' moderation is through the week.
Article not written by a technical person.. (Score:3, Interesting)
"They can also be modelled over a time period of weeks or months instead of over just a few days."
Ohh sweet, so then what used to take days now takes months?
And at one point in the article, it says "20 nodes" and then at another part it says "512 nodes." So like, what is it?
You know what, I don't even care.
Re:VT paid for the G5s (Score:3, Interesting)
You'll notice that no large clusters have built out of G5s since, and it's because nobody else is going to get price breaks significant enough to make it the cheapest solution.
Re:I hope technology will help (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Should help in units conversion ... (Score:2, Interesting)
from other engineers were in pounds while they really were in newtons
(1 pound == 4.45 newton)
Re:Irony emulator (Score:5, Interesting)
The simulator originally ran on IBM System 360 mod 75's (serial numbers 1, 4, and 5). When I was working on it, the simulator was running on a IBM 3033 (370 architecture) machine running MVS, and had a hardware interface that attached 3 AP101's to the system IO channels. The shuttle hardware outside of the AP101's and environment were modelled in the 3033, even including the "slosh dynamics" of the fuel in the external tank. The simulator was written in 370 Assembler with macros for the programming control structures.
One of the funniest things about running the simulator came out of the major failure tests. The simulator had a distinct "abend" that indicated that the vehicle had a position that was below the surface of the earth.
Re:only 10 times faster? (Score:2, Interesting)
As for the comment on making it 11x faster - the other systems serve a different purpose (customer base and funding source)... and they were moved to another location to make room for Columbia.
On a cool note, it looks like they are filming the building of this system so we can see one of those time-lapse videos.
NASA continues to miss the point (Score:3, Interesting)