Congress Cuts NASA's Budget On Apollo Anniversary 462
colonist writes "A House appropriations subcommittee voted to cut NASA's budget request by 7 percent on the 35th anniversary of Neil Armstrong's first steps on the Moon. The panel also cut environment and science programs, but increased funding for veterans' affairs. NASA would get $15.1 billion next year, $229 million below this year and $1.1 billion below the President's request. Most of the cuts are on new initiatives. The subcommittee is the first step of a long budget process and major changes to the bill are expected."
Apple (Score:2, Funny)
Figures (Score:5, Funny)
Trip to mars (Score:5, Funny)
They're also outsourcing NASA jobs to India, I guess.
Comment removed (Score:3, Funny)
Comment removed (Score:3, Funny)
Our new vision (Score:2, Funny)
Apparantly NASA plans to use the Metro's excellent gas mileage to reduce the cost of orbital flights. When asked why they didn't consider using a hybrid vehicle, NASA replied: 'The cost of development is too high for our budget. Plus, those batteries have to be replaced every 10 years at a cost of $2000 a piece. This is simply out of our price range.'
Astronauts are furious at the selection, stating the Metro's horrible acceleration and pathetic top speed. 'It used to take us 8 1/2 minutes to achieve orbit, now it's a 12 hour trip' It's not like there are any rest stops on the way. I'm sure they won't be planning any vacations on the moon anytime soon either.
Re:As Neil said (Score:3, Funny)
Shouldn't it be "That's 93% of a step for one man"?