Web Quantum Computer Simulator 238
Heraklit writes "As reported on Heise News, the Frauenhofer Institute of Computer Architecture and Software Technology has made available the first online quantum computer simulator - it will be simulating up to 31 quantum bits, for testing new advanced quantum algorithms. Behind the scenes, it is a 32 node Athlon 3200 Myrinet Linux Cluster with 56GByte RAM! Now imagine the computing power of a few hundred qubits, if ever constructed..."
maybe they should read /. more? (Score:4, Interesting)
For the quantumly challenged amoung us (Score:3, Interesting)
On the Horizon (Score:3, Interesting)
Michael Chricton (of course) has dealt with the subject quite entertainingly in the novel Timeline. Again, I say the novel.
...simulated? (Score:5, Interesting)
-F
a real QC would be 2^31 times faster (Score:3, Interesting)
The problem with quantum computing . . . (Score:4, Interesting)
Using Shor's factoring algorythm, however, you can extract one of the factors of a large number without knowing all the other factors. That would be useful for public key encryption. I wouldn't worry about your PGP key just yet though. 7 q-bit computers [ibm.com] are incredibly difficult to make. The process used to make the 7-bit QC does not scale to larger numbers easily. 2048 bit computers are way beyond our technical skills.
On a side-note, I wonder if each computer simulates a q-bit (with one responsible for management). It would be the most obvious way to run the simulation, but may or may not be the fastest. There would need to be a lot of cross-communication since all the q-bits are entangled in any interesting quantum computation.
Re:On the Horizon (Score:5, Interesting)
References please? The fundamental problem with teleportation is the impossibility of simultaneouly (or even a reasonable appoximation thereof) introducing kilograms of matter to kilograms of other specially entangled matter, and sending the still-necessary "decoding" data stream to the reciever.
By my count that's at least three impossible things. In order from least impossible to most:
(It's funny how something like this brings out all the physics fanboys who, in their ignorance of physics bounded only by Star Trek, honestly think we're making some sort of progress towards teleportation and the other impossibilities. Instead, real physics just keeps stacking up the reasons why these things are impossible, and the possibilities are receding, not advancing. Why do I have the sneaking suspicion WarriorPoet42's "several physicists" are just "some other teenager I found on a web board somewhere who likes to dazzle other fanboys with his command of physics^W Star Trek buzz-words"?)
Re:Life, The Universe, & Everything (Score:3, Interesting)
Until somebody went and looked at it.
You're modded "Funny" but I actually found the post interesting. And here's why:
There's a bit on THHGTTG that goes
I can't help but wonder exactly what Adams knew about quantum physics...
Re:Life, The Universe, & Everything (Score:5, Interesting)
In one of the books (Life the Universe, and Everything?) he explains about how the infinite improbability generator works, and he states that an artifical brain (Bambleweeney Vector Plotter?) is connected to a really hot cup of tea.
One of the problems with quantum computers is decoherence - isolating the qubits from the environment. I was reading an article where they were discussing a strategy for this by isolating the qubits in a fluid that had a strong random component to it, but where the many interactions averaged out to zero. A fluid with lots of brownian motion - in other words, a hot cup of tea would do.
Re:Those crazy Perl users have beaten them to it! (Score:3, Interesting)
Anyone interested can try it out here [jhu.edu]. You can take any valid input qubit, operate on it with any of six different single-qubit operators, and then see the output qubit. Qubits are represented as both complex spinors and on the Bloch sphere.
Next up is to add two-qubit operations, then work to having a controllable demo of quantum teleportation. I'd appreciate any constructive comments, if anyone would like to add some input.