Pigeons' Bandwidth Advantage Quantified 462
An anonymous reader submits "A well documented test took
place in the north of Israel, in presence of several dozen Internet geeks and
experts. During the test, 3 homing pigeons carried 4 GB (gigabytes) for 100 km
distance, achieving, what apparently looks as pigeons' world record in data
transfer to a given distance. Bandwidth achieved by the pigeons was 2.27
Mbps...Transferring a similar volume of information through a common uplink of
ADSL line would have taken no less than 96 hours..."
Ha! (Score:3, Funny)
But... (Score:5, Funny)
packet loss? (Score:4, Funny)
new firewall technology (Score:5, Funny)
Mandatory joke (Score:5, Funny)
let's get this joke out of the way early (Score:5, Funny)
Now.... (Score:2, Funny)
Hidden disadvantage of broadband... (Score:1, Funny)
Protocol stack (Score:5, Funny)
Time to switch (Score:5, Funny)
Monty would be proud . . . (Score:3, Funny)
It doesn't matter where it grips it... (Score:2, Funny)
What about packet loss? (Score:5, Funny)
Well then (Score:1, Funny)
Re:packet loss? (Score:5, Funny)
But oh so tasty!
plop plop plop (Score:5, Funny)
Insert obligatory joke here about "dropping packets"....
Re:packet loss? (Score:4, Funny)
Ummm... (Score:2, Funny)
MD5 hash... (Score:5, Funny)
What, no packet loss... (Score:5, Funny)
at the risk of getting shat on: (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Back of envalope (Score:2, Funny)
Pong (Score:5, Funny)
Ping time is twice that. Doh!
Fetch me porn (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Back of envalope (Score:1, Funny)
Bin Laden has pigeons now??? It all makes sense!
Re:Back of envalope (Score:3, Funny)
Sorry. Had to. It was there.
What Next? (Score:1, Funny)
Lets see what happens if... (Score:2, Funny)
Pigeon DNS (Score:5, Funny)
And there's a whole other issue with those bastard Verisign Pigeons, but I'm not going to get into that now.
There's also a risk of packet sniffers who use various means to down your pigeons and read your data (no router protection).
And if they do happen to down your pigeon, they can give it new data and send it on its way as if it came from your IP (iniating pigeon). WATCH OUT CREDIT CARDS!
The solution of course is to use Pretty Good Pigeons to protect your data.
two quick thoughts. (Score:3, Funny)
can we now rate MBps in MPH?
Re:new firewall technology (Score:5, Funny)
Wow! That gives a new meaning to the error message "Carrier Lost"
Fat Pipe Pigeons.. (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Sure (Score:1, Funny)
Well, DUH! (Score:5, Funny)
Basically, a station wagon of 35 gig tapes from SETI is driven to it's destination. Takes 16 hrs to fill 1 tape.
Although it is very humorous to see pigeons used, they are still prone to packet failure (automatic weapons fire).
Re:Mandatory joke (Score:1, Funny)
Re:let's get this joke out of the way early (Score:5, Funny)
Ping times (Score:2, Funny)
Stack a 747 full of writable dvd's and you get hell of a bandwidth...
Or even better...
Put em on a superfreighter class ship...
Re:new firewall technology (Score:2, Funny)
Your firewall will be useless against a peck flood.
Re:Lets see what happens if... (Score:5, Funny)
We can't attach them there.
That's where the frickin' lasers go.
What no Coconuts? (Score:2, Funny)
I want to know the Coconut Transfer rate of a Swallow.
And to make this reference complete....
both African and European Swollows!
April 1st? (Score:4, Funny)
Pigeons carrying data? Web page has photos of baby birds as a way to replicate the system, photos of turtles for no good reason.
I think the posts for April Fools Day have started to arrive. Damn, it's early this year.
Better get mine in, then: LZip for DOS [freedos.org] - Yes, lzip 2.0 has been ported to DOS! Lzip is an advanced file compression utility that generates smaller file sizes than either gzip or bzip2, and does so much faster. Lzip can achieve these goals because it it based on a so-called "lossy" compression scheme.
Re:Ha! (Score:5, Funny)
Re:It begins... (Score:3, Funny)
In many senses, it's April 1st everyday at Slashdot.
Re:But... (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Ha! (Score:5, Funny)
Re:packet loss? (Score:5, Funny)
If You don't know what I'm talking about, dust off your copy of GTA3 and tune into Chatterbox...
Re:RFC 1149 - IP datagrams on avian carriers (Score:3, Funny)
<A href=http://www.blug.linux.no/rfc1149/>http://www
It's been implemented!
Paul
Watch out (Score:2, Funny)
Re:But... (Score:5, Funny)
-
The problem with pigeons... (Score:3, Funny)
moral of the story (Score:2, Funny)
Well... (Score:2, Funny)
Re:Pigeon DNS (Score:4, Funny)
As for latency issues, a clever engineer should be able to manipulate the protocol in such a way to reduce round-trips. I would keep all transfers over UDP, not TCP.
Re:But...But... (Score:4, Funny)
You can eat [exoticmeats.com] the pigeons (squab, actually) when they arrive.
And yes, just like chiken, but better.
The RIAA and MPAA... (Score:5, Funny)
African or European Pigeon? (Score:1, Funny)
Big deal! (Score:5, Funny)
No fair... (Score:5, Funny)
Not a fair comparison against DSL...they multiplexed the pigeons. This is just more anti-DSL FUD
;P
Re:let's get this joke out of the way early (Score:3, Funny)
And here's the implementation [linux.no] by the Bergen LUG.
Here's the output (NOTE THOSE PING TIMES):
vegard@gyversalen:~$ ping -i 900 10.0.3.1
PING 10.0.3.1 (10.0.3.1): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 10.0.3.1: icmp_seq=0 ttl=255 time=6165731.1 ms
64 bytes from 10.0.3.1: icmp_seq=4 ttl=255 time=3211900.8 ms
64 bytes from 10.0.3.1: icmp_seq=2 ttl=255 time=5124922.8 ms
64 bytes from 10.0.3.1: icmp_seq=1 ttl=255 time=6388671.9 ms
--- 10.0.3.1 ping statistics ---
9 packets transmitted, 4 packets received, 55% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max = 3211900.8/5222806.6/6388671.9 ms
Noteworthy incompatibility: (Score:5, Funny)
In fact, I would recommend not using ANY kind of cat technologies with this protocol.
Re:Back of envalope (Score:4, Funny)
DSL works at night (Score:1, Funny)
Re:Fetch me porn (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Pong (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Ha! (Score:3, Funny)
Re:packet loss? (Score:3, Funny)
Re:One of those things that shouldn't surprise but (Score:5, Funny)
Mind you a duck will overhaul a pigeon. That fat body is all wing flapping muscle. A duck is built to fly fast, high and for days at a time if needed. A duck in fear of its life can break 100 kph in level flight. An Eider just trying to get somewhere in a hurry for no particular reason has been clocked at 76 kph. That's the current officially confirmed record.
Nevermind the falcon that eats the pigeon creating packet loss.
I have no idea what the achievable bandwidth of a duck is though. They could deliver data intercontinetally. Having to wait through migratory periods would probably kill it pretty good.
KFG
No Blackadder quotes yet? (Score:5, Funny)
OH MY GOD! (Score:1, Funny)
Some people would say this has already happened [imdb.com]
Re:But... (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Ha! (Score:2, Funny)
Re:The lag will be a problem, though... (Score:2, Funny)
Wouldn't that be vanwidth?
Re:But... (Score:2, Funny)
Would those be considered dropped packets?
Re:One of those things that shouldn't surprise but (Score:3, Funny)
The problem as I see it is that pigeons are dogs and ducks are cats. Tell a pigeon to carry something through antipigeon fire to save the regiment and the otherwise intelligent animal will say, "Oooooooo, Oooooooo, can I? Pleeeeeeeeeese!"
Whereas you to try to tell a duck that and he'll say, "Yeah, right Sparky. Blow me. Why don't you just run along and carry it yourself? Or maybe ask that stupid pigeon. I'll bet he'll do it. A pigeon will do anything. Just ask that Skinner dude."
Which is why no duck has ever won a Crouix de Guerre. On the other hand no duck is standing on his remaining leg stuffed in a museum either.
The ducks like it that way.
That isn't to say that a duck won't oblige by carrying a message, but it'll go when he wants, where he wants.
If that happens to coincide with your needs, fine and dandy, if not, well, tough noogies.
KFG
Re:But...But... (Score:5, Funny)
Sometimes they come with notes attached.. it's like fortune cookies with wings!
Re:But... (Score:2, Funny)
Re:Ha! (Score:5, Funny)
So while regular wired methods might not work nearly as quickly over short distances, they're much better to be used internationally.
Oh wait, what's that foot mean next to the article...?
Comment removed (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Ha! (Score:5, Funny)
The big problem to my mind is cat-in-the-middle attacks.
Todays Monty Python (Score:3, Funny)
African or Europen
What? I Dont know
AHHHHHHHHHHHH
Re:The lag will be a problem, though... (Score:5, Funny)
But I think there is work on extending the TCP/IP protocols for interplanetary missions, so timeouts etc might be OK?
I'm pretty sure you'd get 100% packet loss trying to use avian carriers for interplanetary communication.
I guess when the bird died, it would send an ICMP message back about the timeout by falling on your head.
Re:Back of envalope (Score:5, Funny)
African or European?
Re:Ha! (Score:2, Funny)
Free Internet access for everybody! Think of it! (Score:2, Funny)
Re:One of those things (Advance Warning: Offtopic) (Score:3, Funny)
I read this and instantly got a mental picture of some poor geek in a bar modifying it for use as a pick-up line.
[matt]
What about RIAA and the DMCA? (Score:2, Funny)
When they find out that this technology can be used to transfer copyrighted material, and therefore showing up as a potential infringement, those pigeons are going to be in a whole lot of trouble.
After all, why on earth will somebody want to transfer 4 GB of data in such a unlawful and secret way? :)
you dirty pirates!
Re:But... (Score:2, Funny)
But then I realised that the actual April Fool's joke on Slashdot this year was the ad for the OSDN Singles dating site saying "Your options are endless".
Endless indeed: endless numbers of overweight males, confined indoors. Great.
More puns! (Score:2, Funny)
Re:But... (Score:3, Funny)
Re:latency v. bandwidth (Score:5, Funny)
That makes them carrier pigeons!
the correct term would be: (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Back of envalope (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Ha! (Score:5, Funny)
Yeah thats nice... (Score:2, Funny)
It's not even tomorrow yet... (Score:2, Funny)
Well, since it was a network of sorts... (Score:3, Funny)
Wow! (Score:3, Funny)
Well, when the pigon does what pigons do, is that considered an ICMP-Packet-Administratively-Denied?
Re:Ha! (Score:5, Funny)
This joke was probably already made already, but my slashdot pigeon hasn't made it here yet... might've got sucked into a jet engine... poor bastard.
SB
Re:Ha! (Score:2, Funny)
Pigeon Sniffing... (Score:1, Funny)
-AC
Re:Ha! (Score:2, Funny)
I'm inclined to say that its UDP as there was no three-way handshake to establish the connection and no acknowledgement packets sent by the receiver.
Having said that, Pigeons are OSI layer 1, so you can't lay the blame on them.
Re:Ha! (Score:2, Funny)
> scale well over large distances. Not only does
> packet delivery take much longer for when
> distance is increased, but reliability goes way
> down, too.
> So while regular wired methods might not work
> nearly as quickly over short distances, they're
> much better to be used internationally.
All wired methods suffer the same problems with reliabilty as distance increases. That's why you need to install repeaters.
Normally the wire has a male jack, and the repeater a female socket. With pigeons this could introduce excessive delay and introduce long term unexpected artifacts.
Re:But... (Score:4, Funny)
I have 25 fully grown hens at my house. Each is able to carry at least 1 hard drive containing 280 gig. When chased by the 3 cocks I have these hens have been known to fly at a forward speed of about 30 km/hr for a distance upwards to 100m. So these hens should be able to carry a message of 7,000 Gig over 100m in just 9 sec. This would be about 7 times faster than a 10/100 line at max. My chickens should be at least as good as a Cat5e 10/100 Connection. Providing my Cocks are feeling sexy.
A substantial increase in efficiency for single transmissions can be achieved by throwing out some scratch mix. This performance boost is followed by a significant degrading of the transmission rate for several hours.
If the freezer gets empty this transmission rate may suffer a substantial decline.
SCO again! (Score:1, Funny)
Re:Ha! (Score:1, Funny)
by the way this network communication media may be a little bit unstable (bunch of packet lost) around airport zone.
Here is the proof
http://www.ansys.com/industry/defense/solutions_a
Re:Ha! (Score:1, Funny)
[groan]