Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Space Science

Magnetic Field Mystery Solved? 28

OneOver137 writes "Researchers at Harvard may have solved a long-standing mystery: Why are the magnetic fields of the outer gas giants, Uranus and Neptune so unique? Further more, could these fields be used to probe the internal structure of other planets like Mercury, a notoriously difficult subject? Maybe this new technique could be used on the Messenger mission?"
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Magnetic Field Mystery Solved?

Comments Filter:
  • by snake_dad ( 311844 ) on Friday March 12, 2004 @10:21PM (#8549380) Homepage Journal
    Jupiter [nasa.gov] is next, AFAIK. Don't know of any missions being planned to Neptune or Uranus.
  • by Eevee ( 535658 ) on Sunday March 14, 2004 @10:27AM (#8560936)

    I would say that NASA (and everybody else) has always had a single planet focus. Doing a quick scan of the Planetary Exploration Timeline [nasa.gov] at NASA shows two other probes with two planets visited: Pioneer 11 and Mariner 10; a planet and sun combo: Ulysses; and then a sprinkling seven or eight planet and comet or comet and comet probes. All the rest (around 200?) are single target missions. (It's early, my counts may be off.)

    The thing about the Voyager missions is there was a window in 1977 where the gas giants would line up for the Grand Tour--where we could use the gravity assist from one planet to get to the next in a reasonable amount of time. Now, this only happens every 175 years, so I doubt I'll be around to see the next Grand Tour mission. So

    However, like most grand tours, the Voyager missions did suffer from the "If It's Tuesday, This Must Be Belgium" [imdb.com] syndrome of taking some pictures and quickly moving on to the next destination. Most of the probes nowadays are more like picking a beach and spending your entire summer vacation there, so you have enough time to become familiar with the locale. (Or, to use the correct terminology, a flyby mission versus an orbiter mission.)

  • by BlueEyes_Austin ( 738940 ) on Monday March 15, 2004 @02:56PM (#8570598)
    This implies that Neptune and Uranus actually possess a SURFACE that we could put a lander on. How crazy is that!

The only possible interpretation of any research whatever in the `social sciences' is: some do, some don't. -- Ernest Rutherford

Working...