Mars Rover Sniffs First Hint of Water? 479
mhw25 writes "It is reported that the Mars rover Spirit is already well into its scientific mission, and may be detecting hints of water. The mini-Thermal Emission Spectrometer has returned its first image, with probable evidence of carbonates and hydrated minerals. We may know more after the rover rolls off its landing base, after making a 120 degree turn to avoid the airbag blocking its front ramp, to start analyses on soil from Thursday or Friday. An ongoing intrigue is already developing - a scientist reckoned that some of the soil around the airbag 'looks like mud, but it can't be mud'."
intrigue (Score:5, Interesting)
In a bioengineering course I took once we were playing around with various materials prior to creating various cements and I found that many very fine grained ultra dry powders exhibited qualities one might presume were qualities exhibited in mud. Specifically, the appearance of folding up in waves like there were some bonding force holding things together when pushed. Applying various degrees of static charges to the materials appeared to amplify these effects allowing for clumping as well.
I am curious though as to why they dont think it could be mud if they are indeed suspicious of water being present?
"Looks like mud, but it can't be mud" ??? (Score:2, Interesting)
"It looks like mud, but it can't be mud.
I skimmed the article, and did not see it explained anywhere. Why, exactly, can it not be mud?
Thanks in advance!
Re:This Just In (Score:5, Interesting)
In fact, it is only within that last 40 or so years that one of them was known to be primarily water ice, and the other was known to be primarily dry ice (ie., frozen CO2).
The significance of today's discovery is that there is more evidence that there was liquid water (not just ice) present when some of the rocks around the Rover were formed.
Best page for up to the minute news? (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:When will they learn (Score:3, Interesting)
If they tried to keep it under wraps, the Area 51ers would be accusing NASA of a coverup. Besides, it's pretty tough to keep any sort of secret these days, and it's probably better to put out some bad info and have to retract it than having leakers with their own agendas putting out a distorted and fragmented view.
Don't jump (Score:5, Interesting)
As an example. One of my geology profs was studying an outcropping of calcium-rich meta-igneous rock (meta basalt). He kept finding a mix of calcium oxalate minerals on the surface of the rock in numerous places, but couldn't understand how they would be a weathering product. Oxalate minerals are unusual in nature.
Then it dawned on him. Oxalates are common in kidney stones. He bought a live trap and captured several wild rats. Then he kept them in a lab and realized they like to urinate in the same place. What appeared to be a strange chemical weathering reaction was actually just evaporated rat urine.
Point is, first impressions may be incorrect and additional data and study leads to more accurate conclusions. Sometimes those later conclusions are more interesting (or comical) than the original hypothesis.
Re:When will they learn (Score:1, Interesting)
Which means absolute results like, "My God its full carbonate!" is not in doubt.
What is open to speculation is that carbonate means there was water there.
Re:intrigue (Score:2, Interesting)
Microscope needed! (Score:5, Interesting)
All and all, I don't understand why a range of microscopes has not been standard issue on all Mars lander missions.
As a lowly engineer... (Score:5, Interesting)
I know I don't have a clue what I'm talking about (hence posting to
Possible Mud Theory ? (Score:3, Interesting)
Of course... by now though, it'll be frozen again.
Planting Life (Score:5, Interesting)
Aren't there certain bacteria that can survive the long, harsh trip through space? What if they were attached since liftoff, survived the trip through space, survived the burn in the thin atmosphere, and wound up being deposited in a somewhat moist area? Even if there wasn't MUCH water, if there was SOME water, they could, in theory, manage to survive slightly under the surface. Even the tiniest petri dish could wind up with a breeding ground for life on Mars and so long as there's some atmosphere to contain the water and the gases emitted by the bacteria, it could be a spark for future life on Mars.
Sorry if I'm rambling illogically. I'm not well versed in the Martian atmosphere, so feel free to shoot my naive, young hopes down if I'm totally out in left field.
What would really set everyone off.. (Score:4, Interesting)
Re:"Looks like mud, but it can't be mud" ??? (Score:3, Interesting)
As for the low atmospheric pressure, the triple-point of water is 6.1mbar, and Mars' surface atmospheric pressure varies between 3-10 (or thereabouts) - Gusev, being a crater in the lowlands is probably at the high end of that scale, and comfortably above the triple point of water.
I could be wrong of course, but let's see over the next few days what comes back from spirit (I'm not saying we'll find water, just that we may very well find conditions where water *could* exist in a liquid state)
Re:Planting Life (Score:2, Interesting)
If we do detect life or life remnants, future sample retrievals will be able to make the final call certain. Of particular interest would be the discover of a replication process different from RNA/DNA (the basis of all life reproduction on Earth).
Re:intrigue (Score:2, Interesting)
(I'm not being cheeky with this response - it's a genuine question, I have my assumptions, but I'm no physicist
Re:intrigue (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:intrigue (Score:2, Interesting)
For future missions (Score:2, Interesting)
Planting Life, Inadvertently or Purposefully (Score:2, Interesting)
Re: Water, Water Everywhere (Score:2, Interesting)
Of course, Mars may have been bombarded with a bunch of Hematite asteroids, but it seems unlikely given the absence of craters.
Re:As a lowly engineer... (Score:2, Interesting)
Airbag Contents ? (Score:1, Interesting)
Shouldn't we wait until the rover has cleared the landing site before getting our hopes up ?
Re:intrigue (Score:0, Interesting)
Celsius is just plain silly. Basing temperature on a random molecule's states at a specific atmospheric pressure is fairly arbitrary and has little to do with the human condition.
Kelvin makes sense for science, but little else.
Re:Water (Score:5, Interesting)
The triple point (at which solid, gas, and liquid phases are in equilibrium) doesn't change from planet to planet; it's a fixed temperature and pressure pair for any given material.
For water, the triple point is 273.16 K at 611.2 Pa. That pressure is about twice the highest found in the lowest parts of the Martian surface. As a result, any liquid water on the surface will very quickly change phase to ice, vapor, or (most likely) some of both phases.
The nice thing for would-be Martian terraformers is that you only have to double Mars's surface pressure to begin to make liquid water stable in low-lying parts of the surface. Even there, it would freeze solid every night and most days, but you'd get *some* periods where the water might stay liquid for hours at a time during the local afternoon.
Re:intrigue (Score:2, Interesting)
Sublimation is a well known process where ice can go to a vapor state without becoming a liquid first.
This is first year chemistry stuff!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sublimation
air bag? (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:air bag? (Score:3, Interesting)
Really? The ICR would disagree... (Score:4, Interesting)
The Institute for Creation Research, ICR, a conservative Christian group, would have you believe otherwise. In fact, they would hold that you are not a true Christian unless you believe the Bible to be absolute and inerrant.
See their comments on life on other planets here:
www.icr.org/bible/bhta31.html
Also, note that I said conservative Christians, considered to be a small but influencial part of Christianity. There are many denominations to Christianity -- Baptists, Evangelicals, Catholics, Protestants, Methodists, Church of Christ, etc., so perhaps you need to look it up yourself:
www.google.com/search?num=50&hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8
Despite what you say, many Christian groups, conservative or otherwise, view exploration for life on other planets anywhere from skepticism to outright heresy and have used their influence in the current administration to steer policy that is in many ways hostile to science and independant investigation.
My comment was that I am surprised that more attention has not been drawn by religious groups on science that has the potential to bring some of their most treasured tenets into disrepute. There are implications to life on other planets beyond their scientific discovery, you can't call me ignorant for pointing that out.
Comment removed (Score:3, Interesting)