Europe Begins Noise Mapping Effort 381
Makarand writes "The European continent has begun its fight against noise pollution by initiating a
program
to map noise levels for cities in the European Union with more than 250,000 people.
As placing microphones on every building in London or Paris to measure noise
was not practical, data on the amount of traffic carried by roads and the noise levels was fed into computers to generate a model of noise levels across the city. The model's accuracy was verified by taking readings with microphones at 100 points in the city and was found to be accurate on average to within 1 decibel.
The noise maps will allow planning to insulate the public from noise by directing traffic away from residential areas and making funds available to sound-proof thin walled homes."
traffic.equals(noise) returns false (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Alternative Traffic (Score:5, Informative)
1 decibel what? (Score:2, Informative)
Paris Noise (Score:5, Informative)
I live in the noisiest part! Time to move to the country.
Re:cameras (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Rich country? (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Rich country? (Score:5, Informative)
Not only do they have no sound insulation, but they may also have little thermal insulation, and ill-fitting single-glazed windows and doors.
For some time it's been possible to get grants to thermally insulate a house, largely since it is only really economic to do so in the long term (the energy savings also contribute to cutting CO2 emmissions), and poorer people living in the poorer housing can't afford it, and are usually renting anyway.
It's great to hear that the government may be recognizing noise pollution as something which significantly affects people's health in the same way that it recognizes air pollution as doing so.
Noise pollution from traffic causes sleep-deprevation, stress and ultimately illness, and most of the people living in the worst affected housing have little choice in where they live; it's not a choice of moving to somewhere nice and quiet, because that's where all the rich people have moved to.
Re:Rich country? (Score:3, Informative)
Bah (Score:1, Informative)
Re:1 decibel what? (Score:5, Informative)
Measured intensity is 10log(Inew/Io). However, the article said the calculated levels were accurate to within 1 db(average). That means the difference between calculated and measured was 1 db regardless of the actual level. Now, since the average was accurate within 1 db, that could mean 4 at 1/2 db difference and 1 at 3db difference for engineers. (.5+.5+.5+.5+3)/5=1
For politicians, it could mean that one was +42 and one was -38 for an average of (+48 -32)/2=1.
Beware of statistics.
Re:1 decibel what? (Score:3, Informative)
Its not only 1/10 of the log10(x), but 1/10*log10(x/10^-12 w/m^2).
Blame the road surface not the drivers (Score:5, Informative)
So, rather than annoying drivers by making them go a longer way round (and therefore increasing congestion and pollution) mending the roads would be a better solution.
Here are some statistics from the Hong Kong govt who are already doing this:
http://www.epd.gov.hk/epd/english/environm
Re:traffic.equals(noise) returns false (Score:3, Informative)
Cities are laying down rubberized asphalt in lieu of building noise walls.
A quote for the pdf belowThe study concluded that there was an approximate 10 dBA reduction in noise with the rubberized asphalt compared with the chip seal asphalt.
In my experience - it has been rather effective.
Check Here [rubberizedasphalt.org] and
Here [saccounty.net]
Re:traffic.equals(noise) returns false (Score:3, Informative)
Re:link to the Noise Level map for Paris (Score:4, Informative)
Re:traffic.equals(noise) returns false (Score:3, Informative)
In addition, the "twice as loud" perception is highly dependent on the type of noise. The 10db = twice as loud rule only works for pure tones at 1KHz. At other frequencies / types of sound, the perception is different.
So 1db is really quite close.
1 decibel is quite a lot (Score:4, Informative)
Decibels are a logarithmic scale: an increase of 1 decibel actually corresponds to a 30% increase in noise levels.
Actually I'm surprised it's even that accurate. Traffic levels only get you so far -- the urban environment (architecture, trees) is also extremely important. Under my apartmenet block there's a raised arcade that basically serves as a resonator, making traffic sound louder.
Re:Alternative Traffic (Score:3, Informative)
By the same token, an average gasoline-powered lawnmower used for 1 hour emits as much of the above harmful pollutants as a new car driven for 8,000 miles.
Re:Rich country? (Score:2, Informative)
The Purdue Institute for Safe, Quiet, and Durable Highways [purdue.edu]
Just because it's not in the news doesn't mean it's not happening.
Re:Rich country? (Score:3, Informative)
My personal favorite are the people of Ozone Park (Queens, NY). Most of these people gladly purchased homes adjacent to JFK International Airport (one of the busier in the world) then complain about the jet noise.
Is this the right solution (Score:3, Informative)
A WHO report estimated that 40 percent of EU residents -- 150 million people -- are exposed to road traffic noise exceeding 55 decibels and that over 30 percent suffer noise levels at night that disturb sleep.
I understand that these people can't afford sound proofing, but are earplugs really that far out of reach for them? If my sleep was disturbed by cars outside, I would buy some.
Re:Rich country? (Score:3, Informative)
Maybe I was not clear enough in my answer. What I was trying to point out is that a lot of buildings in Europe are old to very old and never incorporated sound-proofing at all.
It's not a stupid decision to buy an old house or a flat in an old building: sometimes, it's just really hard to find a modern building, either downtown or in the suburbs.
In any case, giving a tax break to X to put sound-proofing materials is not "punishing" Y for purchasing a sound-proofed home. It just means that X now has enough money to sound-proof his/her home, while Y has lost nothing.
This is not a case of the government bailing out someone who has made a bad decision: this is a case of the government recognizing that some cities are too noisy (because they are/were not designed with cars in mind) and giving citizens incentives to sound-proof their homes. It sounds to me like a good investment.
Finally, please remember that taxes are very high in Europe. So giving tax breaks to promote certain beneficial policies makes sense...
Re:Rich country? (Score:2, Informative)