Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Science Technology

Duck-Billed Dinosaurs Suffered From Cancer 31

Polyploid Pimp writes "Nature reports a study by Bruce Rothschild of NEOUCOM about cancer in dinosaurs. Rothschild's group X-rayed 10,000 bones of over 700 museum specimens across North America. They found that only one group, the hadrosaurs or duck-billed dinosaurs got cancer. They hypothesize the cancer may be due to the dinosaurs presumed diet of conifers, which contain a number of known carcinogens. Additionally, this group of dinosaurs is thought (by some people) to have been warm blooded, which may have increased their cancer risk. They cite as support for conducting their study that understanding the causes and rates of cancer in other animals may provide insight into human cancers. I find it an interesting story as it demonstrates another use for museum specimens outside of their original collection purposes, and represents (to me at least) one reason to keep funding them, since you never know how the material may be used in the future."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Duck-Billed Dinosaurs Suffered From Cancer

Comments Filter:
  • by rhombic ( 140326 ) on Wednesday October 29, 2003 @01:23PM (#7338994)
    Come on, everybody knows dinosaurs got cancer from smoking. Duh.
  • Erm? (Score:4, Funny)

    by WTFmonkey ( 652603 ) on Wednesday October 29, 2003 @01:37PM (#7339111)
    Dinosaur tumours have been mooted before...
    What? Is that a paleontological term, or just a british one?
    • Re:Erm? (Score:3, Informative)

      by Valdrax ( 32670 )

      To moot means to bring up for discussion. The word has fallen out of usage in American English (at least).

      The adjective

      moot is originally a legal term going back to the mid-16th century. It derives from the noun moot, in its sense of a hypothetical case argued as an exercise by law students. Consequently, a moot question is one that is arguable or open to debate. But in the mid-19th century people also began to look at the hypothetical side of moot as its essential meaning, and they started to use the wor

    • Dinosaur tumours have been mooted before...

      What? Is that a paleontological term, or just a british one?

      Honestly, someone should teach the British to speak English. ;)

  • by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday October 29, 2003 @01:49PM (#7339247)
    X-raying bones the way this guy does on the picture [nature.com]doesn't seem very safe to me. In hospitals, X-ray operations are protected by leaded windows or aprons (sp?)... Studying dinos causes cancer ;-)
  • by bluGill ( 862 ) on Wednesday October 29, 2003 @01:59PM (#7339356)

    AFAIK we only have bones (and fossilized ones at that, which don't really contain the origional bone), and not the rest of the dinosaur to examine. So are they willing to say no type of cancer in all those others, or just no bone cancer?

  • by Anonymous Coward
    They didnt even have artificial colors or flavors, and they still got cancer!
  • by Anonymous Coward
    The state of California has determined under Proposition 65 that being warm-blodded is hazardous to one's health. All warm-blooded individuals are hereby ordered to evacuate the State by April 2007.
  • Lol (Score:3, Funny)

    by BoomerSooner ( 308737 ) on Wednesday October 29, 2003 @08:23PM (#7342920) Homepage Journal

    I find it an interesting story as it demonstrates another use for museum specimens outside of their original collection purposes, and represents (to me at least) one reason to keep funding them, since you never know how the material may be used in the future.

    I wish I could convice my parent company that they need to keep funding our office because they cannot predict what benefit we may be in the future! I bet there's more than one VC based company thinking the same thing.
  • How do we know what is carcinogens for dinosaurs. Thay could have quite a differnet digestion system from ours and current animals. What irritates our stomach could be healthy to dinosaurs.
    • Carcinogens are for the most part carcinogens to all amimals. The ames test is the current test which is done on bacteria to determine if a substance is a mutagen(not the same as a carcinogen, but close). DNA is DNA every plant and animal AND dinosaur has it. A substance that causes cancer in one animal will in all likelyhood cause cancer in another.
  • I'm not sending them postcards. The scam about the little girl was believable, but duck-billed dinosaurs?!

    This is getting old.

  • ducks? (Score:2, Funny)

    by bobba22 ( 566693 )
    I had no idea ducks were around in the age of the dinosaurs! What service were they providing and how did the billing system work? Why was it that only the dinosaurs being billed by the ducks were susceptable to cancer? How do we know now which dinos were indeed being billed by the ducks? Should we be avoiding ducks now? If I am over on my payments to a duck, should I be worried about cancer? Alternatively - Why are they called duck-billed dinos? surely they had the bills before ducks did, therefore making
  • unless it is benign most of the time having vunerability to cancer (I would think) would end a species long before it had a chance to exist for millions of years.The theory of survival of a species is pretty tough to major faults. A baby elephant (chuckle)born with one leg shorter does not start a herd of elephants with the same likness it gets eaten. If the food of a duck bill hurts the duckbill it seem to me like a couple of generations before the end. X-raying rocks that look like bones can tell a lot

I program, therefore I am.

Working...