4 Tons Of Plants per Mile to Ride In Your Car 995
Roland Piquepaille writes "As you might know, I enjoy big numbers. So it's just natural that I was attracted by this news release from the University of Utah, "Bad Mileage: 98 tons of plants per gallon." "A staggering 98 tons of prehistoric, buried plant material is required to produce each gallon of gasoline we burn in our cars, SUVs, trucks and other vehicles." For a reasonably efficient car, riding 25 miles per gallon, this translates to 4 tons of prehistoric plants per mile, or more than two tons per kilometer. The research paper also mentions that everyday, we are using the fossil fuel equivalent of all the plants growing during a whole year just for our cars. Even if these numbers are too large, this still makes you think about how inefficient our cars are. This analysis describes the calculations and contains other details about the research paper which will be published in November by Climate Change."
say no to cars? (Score:5, Funny)
"Building more roads to combat traffic congestion is like buying a bigger belt to combat obesity"
Inefficient? (Score:5, Funny)
I think it shows how inefficient mother nature is. Stupid nature, not forseeing our need to drive Hummers and Ford Excursions!
Thank goodness for research like this (Score:4, Funny)
Athlons and Pentiums (Score:2, Funny)
When asked about the energy required to create his polyester pants, Hugger refused comment.
fat=inefficiency (Score:2, Funny)
And I thought (Score:3, Funny)
That's interesting, but the real question is... (Score:4, Funny)
No, what it really is (Score:2, Funny)
Atomic energy will save us... (Score:5, Funny)
A single aspirin-sized pellet of uranium will provide Mr. and Mrs. America with enough power to run their car for a lifetime. And soon, the peaceful atom will provide a propulsion source that will make family helicars practical and affordable.
Scientists expect this to happen in a few short decades--perhaps before the end of the sixties.
At least, that's what the science teacher said when I was in junior high school.
Re:burgers (Score:2, Funny)
<liberal hippie mode off>
<fat American mode on> Don't worry, it doesn't even come close to the amount of trash I make. If someone doesn't eat those cows, they will just go to waste anyway.
Re:burgers (Score:5, Funny)
Re:What's the point here? (Score:4, Funny)
Not only that... (Score:5, Funny)
Automobiles are far more inefficient than even this article implies.
Re:say no to cars? (Score:2, Funny)
You won't mind if we start with you, then? I mean, you spelled 'humanity' wrong.
That's small potatoes (Score:2, Funny)
How monumentally inefficient! We should all be living as hunter/gatherers, like the Bushmen of the Kalahari.
We Need Better Plants (Score:3, Funny)
Won't someone think of the children?
M@
Shamelessly wasteful! (Score:3, Funny)
Next thing you know, they'll be saying that it takes hundreds of tons of hydrogen to fuse to allow a solar powered car to drive a mile. How wasteful!
GF.
Re:burgers (Score:2, Funny)
Re:burgers (Score:5, Funny)
The guy who wrote this seems a bit optimistic (Score:4, Funny)
Timmmmmmberrrrrr!
So let's kill more plants (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Ride a motorcycle. (Score:2, Funny)
Re:say no to cars? (Score:2, Funny)
Instead of driving five miles to the park to jog, just walk to the store and back.
My mother used to walk all over Brooklyn pulling a little shopping cart behind her going from store to store buying "whats on sale", she lived to be 75 and was as strong as three cell phone toting yuppies!
Re:burgers (Score:4, Funny)
Beef cattle are slaughtered at 18 months. Add a little more for the breeding cows, and you can push it to two years average. Find your own links.
Since your 700/100 lbs per cow is from a completely unreferenced anecdote, I'll throw in one of my own. McDonalds burgers are 100% beef, because they are (very nearly) 100% of the cow. Picture a huge cow sized grinder, making cow paste. You don't have to believe me; instead, find me anyone who works in the slaughter industry who'll eat a fast food burger.
Re:burgers (Score:3, Funny)