A Traveler's Guide To Mars 119
A Traveler's Guide To Mars | |
author | William K. Hartmann |
pages | 445 |
publisher | Workman Publishing |
rating | 8 - Good book, some flaws notwithstanding. |
reviewer | Tony Williams |
ISBN | 0761126066 |
summary | Good interesting guide to Mars |
With all the noise and kerfuffle about Mars recently I thought I should take a look at the Red Planet. I'm not well educated about astronomy, have to think hard to get the order of the planets right, but still wanted something with some depth. I found a great little guide for the uninformed visitor, "A Traveler's Guide to Mars" by William K Hartmann. This fairly inexpensive volume is full of all the information you're going to need, a large number of pictures, several maps and a great deal of information about previous voyagers to the planet. Indeed Hartmann was one of the scientists for the Mars Global Surveyor mission.
This book really does look like a typical traveler's guide with large print, bold headings, a good use of colour and text boxes. The style is light enough that when it gets scientific you don't notice too much. It is broken up into seven sections
- Introducing Mars: Past and Present.
- Noachian Mars: Exploring The Oldest Provinces
- Interlude: Landing on Mars
- Hesperian Mars: A Time of Transition
- Interlude: Rocks From Mars
- Amazonian Mars: The Red Planet Today
- Where Do We come From, Where Are We Going
The first section is a quick overview of the planet and a look at the history of Martian research. Section three looks at the various landings and what they discovered. Section five is a single chapter explaining the Martian meteors and what they might mean. Section seven is also small and looks at future Martian research. The other three sections look at the geography and geology of various parts of the Red Planet.
I found the whole book fascinating. I particularly liked the way Hartmann kept almost all his own tale in small sidebars called "My Martian Chronicles", 15 of them scattered through the book. These were interesting and meant that he could push his own barrow in a way that didn't intrude into the rest of the book, you could read them when you wanted. Throughout the book you get a huge amount of information about Mars and how the various bits were likely formed and what further exploration is likely to find.
All that said, it's not a book that can be taken in huge gulps. It took me several weeks to read it, picking it up and reading a few chapters then putting it down for a day or so, then perhaps another hour or two just looking at pictures, maps and reading sidebars. The layout does lend itself to this, however, so I'm not quite certain I'd call this a flaw, it seemed like a good way of making a 450 page book on Mars that much easier to digest. It also doesn't seem like a book that you need to read cover to cover, in order. I certainly didn't, reading bits about the meteors and landings and the last section before reading the section on Hesperian Mars.
The Workman Publishing web page on the book is not much use, with only a tiny excerpt from the book and while the book does have a selected reading list at the end it would have been nice to have a list of recommended web sites for further information as most of us don't have access to the sort of library likely to carry advanced astronomy journals or books.
If you're not an astronomy geek and want to know more about Mars then you may well find this book ideal. I certainly enjoyed my visit to the Red Planet.
You can purchase A Traveler's Guide To Mars from bn.com. Slashdot welcomes readers' book reviews -- to see your own review here, read the book review guidelines, then visit the submission page.
Re:Cheaper at Amazon! (Score:2)
A Traveler's Guide to Mars at Amazon [amazon.com]
Justin
Who is Mar? (Score:1, Funny)
Re:Who is Mar? (Score:1)
Or, for those who don't like reading... (Score:1, Funny)
...you can try to keep abreast with a copy of Total Recall.
(ba dum ching)
Re:Or, for those who don't like reading... (Score:1)
What (Score:5, Funny)
Re:What (Score:5, Funny)
I told my travel agent that I wasn't much into water sports, but that I did like to spend hours just walking the beach.
She told me she had just the place, miles and miles of beach with unique red sand.
She didn't tell me there was no frickin' water. Oh, a little frost line on the ground maybe, but that's it. I don't think that counts. I may not swim or surf, but I do think the beach is kinda defined by the water.
Next year I'm going back to the Jersey Shore.
KFG
Re:What (Score:2)
Don't forget the dropbear repelent..
Re:What (Score:1)
Screw the Rough Guide to Saturn (Score:1)
Re:Screw the Rough Guide to Saturn (Score:2)
Foder's Mars on $42million a day was much better (Score:2)
Both are a little stale on travel an accomidations. I have a pretty good deal with an agent named "Klatoo."
Re:What (Score:1)
Re:What (Score:2)
Hmm (Score:2, Funny)
Re:Hmm (Score:1)
Hotels? Restaurants? Nightlife? (Score:2, Funny)
Also, is it accurate to say the Mars Needs Guitars?
Re:Hotels? Restaurants? Nightlife? (Score:3, Funny)
-------------------
'Cause the man from Mars won't eat up bars where the T.V's on.
And now he's gone back up to space where he won't have a hassle with the
human race
And you hip hop.
And you don't stop
Just blast off, sure shot
'Cause the man from Mars stopped eating cars
And eating bars
And now he only eats guitars
Get up!
------------------
I guess so.
DG
Good work. (Score:1)
Actually, I was more thinking of ... (Score:2)
Save me some time please?? (Score:2)
Re:Save me some time please?? (Score:2)
At least... (Score:5, Funny)
Mostly harmless.
one question. (Score:2)
Re:one question. (Score:2, Funny)
Was anyone impressed? (Score:4, Interesting)
So, did anyone see anything really cool? It seemed to me that most of the people getting excited don't realize that you can see Mars all the time.
Re:Was anyone impressed? (Score:1, Insightful)
So, did anyone see anything really cool? It seemed to me that most of the people getting excited don't realize that you can see Mars all the time.
It's just one of those things that people make a big fuss over just because they're statistically rare even though there isn't anything tangible that happens. Kinda like birthdays. Or baseball stats. It made for some good Hubble pictures though.
Re:Was anyone impressed? (Score:1)
Birthdays are rare?
I'm pretty sure someone has a birthday every day.
Re:Was anyone impressed? (Score:2, Insightful)
The big deal is Mars is in a favorable opposition and this occurs 15-17 yrs.
What's cool is you can the the polar caps and some dark surface markings.
The obserable size remains much the same a couple of weeks on either side of closest approach. So there was a lot of hype for that one day.
Re:Was anyone impressed? (Score:2, Interesting)
You can't see mars all the time
Re:Was anyone impressed? (Score:1, Interesting)
Re:Was anyone impressed? (Score:1)
Re:Was anyone impressed? (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Was anyone impressed? (Score:1)
Yup, /that/ I thought was very impressive.
By the way, for the people chiding me -- I'm not in any way anti-Mars. 1) Anything that gets people interested in science and nature is good and 2) I hadn't realized that there was anything unusual to see through telescopes. I just hadn't seen anything impressive and was curious as to what I'd missed.
Planet-planet-planet-planet (Score:2)
Re:Was anyone impressed? (Score:1)
It struck me as less impressive than when Mars and Venus were next to each other a few years ago and you could really see how one is red and one is blue.
Venus is _not_ blue. I don't know what you were looking at, but the only blue things in the solar system are Neptune and Uranus and they're only barely visible to the naked eye.
If you had used a telescope you could have easily seen a number of features that are not regularly visible.
Re:Was anyone impressed? (Score:1)
Re:Was anyone impressed? (Score:2)
Re:Was anyone impressed? (Score:2)
One small problem (Score:4, Funny)
My own mini Traveler's Guide to Mars (Score:5, Funny)
1) How to get there (and back).
Answer: A rocket. Reallllly big. Lots of fuel, lots of food and water. DON'T forget the zero-g toilet and about a zillion barf bags. It's a bumpy ride, so take some seat cushions for the ascents and descents. Also take some sunglasses and SPF-1000000 sunblock.
2) Money.
Answer: You'll want to exchange currency at Mars Customs, located on Deimos. Avoid Phobos altogether - it's just a tourist trap. Martians have but 3 fingers on their 'hands' (okay, tentacles), so their math is a little funky. I'd advise taking a calculator for doing conversions both into their currency, and their math. Prices on Mars are generally reasonable, but you don't want to pay too much! Shop around. Oh yeah, bring a moneybelt. The natives are lightfingered little bastards, not that I'd want to generalize. Some of my best friends are Martians. Honest.
3) The weather.
Answer: Enroute is normal, unless you have a breach in the spacecraft. If that happens, it won't matter what you packed. On Mars itself, the air is somewhat thin, so pack a pressure suit. It's also somewhat chilly, so layer! Bring plenty of oxygen. It doesn't rain, so no umbrella is needed, but you may experience something the "Red Planet" is famous for: a sandstorm. Trust me on this - just stay in the spaceship during one. If caught outside, determine which way the sand is blowing, then get in the shadow of a rockface. Leave your galoshes at home.
4) The sights.
Answer: Lots of rocks and dirt. Some sand and dust, as well, plus two moons in the sky and a bright dot for the Sun. Don't miss the 'Face' on Mars. Inside is a typical Martian funhouse, full of those funny distorting mirrors. Those are a blast. A side-trip to the North Pole is full of frozen fun, but make sure to take a native guide to get the most out of your time.
5) The food.
Answer: Kind of bland, but worth the experience. Dried Martian dust-mite on a bed of Martian cabbage is the classic dish. Get used to dust on everything. It is safe to drink the water on Mars (Yes, it's there, but expensive!), as non-native microbes can't effect the Human body.
6) The natives.
Answer: As seen on TV! Little green guys with big eyes, and three tentacles per 'hand'. They used to be big on invading other planets back in the 50s and 30s, but they've mellowed out a lot since Perestroika.
7) The nightlife.
Answer: They like to boogie. Martian-tossing is the latest fad you'll find in all the nightclubs. They're real big on karaoke, as well, and classic Earth cinema is all the rage. "Santa Claus vs the Martians" is still #1 at the box office.
8) The beer.
Answer: They import it from Canada. Labatt Red is the drink of choice.
Don't forget to buy souvenirs for all your friends!
oops: forgot something! (Score:2)
1) Mars...Needs...Women!
2) Alcohol & 1/3 Earth gravity do NOT mix well.
Re:oops: forgot something! (Score:1)
Re:oops: forgot something! (Score:2)
Pictures from Mars. (Score:2)
If you're missing home, or you want to show off Earth to your Martian friends, do take t
Re:Things slashdot could comment on... (Score:2)
Re:One small problem (Score:1)
Well, now he lives here on Earth, but I have serious doubts
about his origins. He can be a Martian or just a Wookie
undercovered as a human, who knows...
Mars is NOT "far brighter" (Score:5, Informative)
Mars is all of 1% closer this year than it has ever been in the last 600 years. This is an almost insignificant amount. "Even with a good telescope and a camera", writes "Bad Astronomy" [badastronomy.com] debunker Phil Platt in on a page about the closeness of mars and a variety of bad astronomy being spread about it [badastronomy.com], "you'd have a hard time seeing the difference. In fact, the difference is so small it would just barely be detectable using Hubble."
Re:Mars is NOT "far brighter" (Score:2)
Re:Mars is NOT "far brighter" (Score:1)
I'm also sick of reporters saying that this is "the closest Mars has been to earth in the past 60,000 [or whatever the date was] years." This is
Re:Mars is NOT "far brighter" (Score:1)
which just goes to show... (Score:1)
btw, I don't know what you are talking about, when earth and mars are closest, mars is always at opposition.
The difference this time is that mars is also near perhelion while earth is near aphelion....
Re:Mars is NOT "far brighter" (Score:3, Insightful)
Yes and no. Mars brightness varies very much over a cycle of around 2 years. Right now is the peak, which makes a great time for Mars observations. In addition, this particular peak is slightly stronger than it has been for a long time, but as you say that effect is quite insignificant.
But why so negative about the buzz? While it makes little difference for observations and travel, isn
Re:Mars is NOT "far brighter" (Score:4, Informative)
Re:Mars is NOT "far brighter" (Score:1)
Actually, I did misread, but not in the way opergost suggested. I misread "600 centuries" in Phil Platt's article as "600 years". So, as a correction, "Mars is all of 1% closer this year than it has ever been
marketing (Score:1)
It's marketing, and it is a beautiful site when it's close. What you don't understand is that people don't want to go out and look at mars every time it's at opposition... about once every 60,000 years is enough for them --- it's a marketing event for astronomy and what's wrong with that? what's to debunk?
OR: read "Red/Green/Blue Mars" instead... (Score:5, Informative)
Re:OR: read "Red/Green/Blue Mars" instead... (Score:1)
Conclusion... (Score:2)
A typical traveler's guide (Score:3, Funny)
Does it have any good ideas on how to get there and back?
Re:A typical traveler's guide (Score:1)
KFG
Re:A typical traveler's guide (Score:5, Funny)
Re:A typical traveler's guide (Score:2, Funny)
Re:A typical traveler's guide (Score:2, Informative)
"The Case for Mars" by Robert Zubrin (Score:4, Interesting)
I definitely recommend people to check out The Case for Mars [amazon.com] by Robert Zubrin.
It is a pretty intriguing book explaining how we could basically use "off-the-shelf" technology to get there and live off the land once we get there.
In the meantime, how will we get there? (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:In the meantime, how will we get there? (Score:2)
Re:In the meantime, how will we get there? (Score:1)
no and yes.
I am in no way suggesting you lift 1000 tons of anything into space. Said material is not only strong, it's light. I'm no expert in the field, but what I read says a 3mm-diameter string lifts 45 tons, and that a full kilometer of it weighs in the 7.5kg (!) vicinity, given you can epoxy enough carbon molecules together into such a long string.
And you don't need to lift a full elevator ribbon to spa
Re:In the meantime, how will we get there? (Score:2)
many or few there are a couple huge honking ones.
A) No lab manufactured nano tube to date of any manufacturing technique has yet to produce strands close enough to the theoretical max strength to prove It is possible to create a space elevator.
B) No one yet knows how or even if its realistic to draw them out into suffcient lengths to stretch across a room much less 70,000 kilometers. Similar problems with joining smaller strands to make larger ones without loosing strength.
T
A better choice (Score:4, Funny)
I mean seriously, there are a lot more interesting places to visit in the galaxy than Mars. There's no reason why I should want a book telling me all about going there and paying to see the sights, when I can get a guide that tells me how to get around the whole galaxy for free!
Re:A better choice (Score:1)
Amazons - Chapter 6 (Score:4, Funny)
The title of Ch. 6, "Amazonian Mars: The Red Planet Today", totally sold the book for me. Who are these Martian Amazons, and where did they come from?
I can't think of anything more arousing than the thought of lonely Martian/Amazon girls who have grown to heights of 7-8 feet in the lower gravity environment, and who could snap me in half like a twig.
Re:Amazons - Chapter 6 (Score:1)
Re:Amazons - Chapter 6 (Score:2)
I'd try doggy style. But that's me.
Re:Amazons - Chapter 6 (Score:2)
I don't usually nitpick erotic fantasies about sexy alien space vixens, but if they were tall, skinny and evolved in a lower gravity, I think you'd be the one having to worry about snapping them in half.
You haven't seen my body, have you?
*ahem* (Score:2)
Obligatory Douglas Adams Reply...... (Score:2)
Why can't we see "canals" by squinting at photos? (Score:4, Interesting)
Why can't I see "canals" by looking at high-quality photographs of Mars from a distance, and/or squinting?
Percival Lowell and his team at Flagstaff published detailed drawings in which there was a veritable spiderweb of canals, dozens and dozens of them spanning the whole planet.
It's now accepted that these long, linear features were a kind of optical illusion.
But why can't I experience the optical illusion for myself?
An interesting near-contemporary account is givenin this article in the Eleventh Edition of the Encyclopaedia Britannica [1911encyclopedia.org] "Of the reality of the better marked ones there can be no doubt, as they have been seen repeatedly by many observers, including those at the Lick Observatory, and have actually been photographed at the Lowell Observatory. The doubt is therefore confined to the vast network of lines so fine that they never certainly have been seen elsewhere than at Flagstaff. The difficulty of pronouncing upon their reality arises from the fact that we have to do mainly with objects not plainly visible (or, as Lowell contends, not plainly visible elsewhere). The question therefore becomes one of psychological optics rather than of astronomy. When the question is considered from this point of view it is found that combinations of light and shaded areas very different from continuous lines, will, under certain conditions, be interpreted by the eye as such lines; and when such is the case, long practice by an observer, however carefully conducted, may confirm him in this interpretation. "
Re:Why can't we see "canals" by squinting at photo (Score:1)
Re:Why can't we see "canals" by squinting at photo (Score:1)
Re:Why can't we see "canals" by squinting at photo (Score:1)
From This place [setileague.org]
Correct the first word of the article please (Score:1)
"Mar's closest visit to the earth..."
Come on. It should read: "Mars' closest visit to the earth...".
Favorite pet peeve (Score:2)
It should read "Mars's [...]". The possessive s is only ommited when the noun is plural, not when it otherwise ends with an s. You know, one does look a bit foolish when pointing out an editor's obvious typo by suggesting a gramatically incorrect correction.
Unless you are under the impression that there is more than Mars. :-)
-- MG
Red Mars, Green Mars, Blue Mars (Score:1)
Question - a little OT (Score:2)
Malacandra (Score:1)