Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Space Books Media Book Reviews

A Traveler's Guide To Mars 119

Mar's closest visit to the earth for a while may be over -- but while that reddish speck is still far brighter than usual, you might want to brush up on your Martian knowledge. Read on below for honestpuck's review of A Traveler's Guide To Mars.
A Traveler's Guide To Mars
author William K. Hartmann
pages 445
publisher Workman Publishing
rating 8 - Good book, some flaws notwithstanding.
reviewer Tony Williams
ISBN 0761126066
summary Good interesting guide to Mars

With all the noise and kerfuffle about Mars recently I thought I should take a look at the Red Planet. I'm not well educated about astronomy, have to think hard to get the order of the planets right, but still wanted something with some depth. I found a great little guide for the uninformed visitor, "A Traveler's Guide to Mars" by William K Hartmann. This fairly inexpensive volume is full of all the information you're going to need, a large number of pictures, several maps and a great deal of information about previous voyagers to the planet. Indeed Hartmann was one of the scientists for the Mars Global Surveyor mission.

This book really does look like a typical traveler's guide with large print, bold headings, a good use of colour and text boxes. The style is light enough that when it gets scientific you don't notice too much. It is broken up into seven sections

  1. Introducing Mars: Past and Present.
  2. Noachian Mars: Exploring The Oldest Provinces
  3. Interlude: Landing on Mars
  4. Hesperian Mars: A Time of Transition
  5. Interlude: Rocks From Mars
  6. Amazonian Mars: The Red Planet Today
  7. Where Do We come From, Where Are We Going

The first section is a quick overview of the planet and a look at the history of Martian research. Section three looks at the various landings and what they discovered. Section five is a single chapter explaining the Martian meteors and what they might mean. Section seven is also small and looks at future Martian research. The other three sections look at the geography and geology of various parts of the Red Planet.

I found the whole book fascinating. I particularly liked the way Hartmann kept almost all his own tale in small sidebars called "My Martian Chronicles", 15 of them scattered through the book. These were interesting and meant that he could push his own barrow in a way that didn't intrude into the rest of the book, you could read them when you wanted. Throughout the book you get a huge amount of information about Mars and how the various bits were likely formed and what further exploration is likely to find.

All that said, it's not a book that can be taken in huge gulps. It took me several weeks to read it, picking it up and reading a few chapters then putting it down for a day or so, then perhaps another hour or two just looking at pictures, maps and reading sidebars. The layout does lend itself to this, however, so I'm not quite certain I'd call this a flaw, it seemed like a good way of making a 450 page book on Mars that much easier to digest. It also doesn't seem like a book that you need to read cover to cover, in order. I certainly didn't, reading bits about the meteors and landings and the last section before reading the section on Hesperian Mars.

The Workman Publishing web page on the book is not much use, with only a tiny excerpt from the book and while the book does have a selected reading list at the end it would have been nice to have a list of recommended web sites for further information as most of us don't have access to the sort of library likely to carry advanced astronomy journals or books.

If you're not an astronomy geek and want to know more about Mars then you may well find this book ideal. I certainly enjoyed my visit to the Red Planet.


You can purchase A Traveler's Guide To Mars from bn.com. Slashdot welcomes readers' book reviews -- to see your own review here, read the book review guidelines, then visit the submission page.

This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

A Traveler's Guide To Mars

Comments Filter:
  • by Otter ( 3800 ) on Wednesday September 03, 2003 @01:18PM (#6860421) Journal
    What was the big deal about with Mars? I'm no astronomy buff but do enjoy the things that pop up (meteor showers, Hale-Bopp, that really big Y2K moon). But Mars seems to have been marginally brighter than usual, with nothing special visible. It struck me as less impressive than when Mars and Venus were next to each other a few years ago and you could really see how one is red and one is blue.

    So, did anyone see anything really cool? It seemed to me that most of the people getting excited don't realize that you can see Mars all the time.

  • by WhiteBandit ( 185659 ) on Wednesday September 03, 2003 @01:33PM (#6860574) Homepage
    Well, I imagine the reviewed book will be pretty useful once we get there. In the meantime, how will we get there?

    I definitely recommend people to check out The Case for Mars [amazon.com] by Robert Zubrin.

    It is a pretty intriguing book explaining how we could basically use "off-the-shelf" technology to get there and live off the land once we get there.
  • by klubkatz ( 704018 ) on Wednesday September 03, 2003 @01:44PM (#6860674)
    If you had a telescope to view it I think you would have been much more impressed. The view I got through my 8-inch newtonian with a 9mm eyepiece was increadible.

    You can't see mars all the time ... it's lost in the suns glare for a large part of every year. A view like the one we just had doesn't happen very often.
  • by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday September 03, 2003 @01:48PM (#6860718)
    I was impressed. I'm not a big astronomy buff either. However, I decided that I was interested enough in astronomy that I purchased a telescope for the event. I enjoyed looking at Mars through the scope, and Mars *was* brighter. At the time of opposition, Mars had a magnitude of -2.9. Next April, Mars will be at a magnitude of 1.44. While I'm not an astronomer, I do know that the more negative the magnitude, the brighter the object. There's also the historical fact that this is the closest we will be to Mars in our lifetime, indeed for a couple of lifetimes. When one ponders the heavens, it just absolutely blows the mind. ;-)
  • by dpbsmith ( 263124 ) on Wednesday September 03, 2003 @02:52PM (#6861398) Homepage
    Something that's been bothering me for years.

    Why can't I see "canals" by looking at high-quality photographs of Mars from a distance, and/or squinting?

    Percival Lowell and his team at Flagstaff published detailed drawings in which there was a veritable spiderweb of canals, dozens and dozens of them spanning the whole planet.

    It's now accepted that these long, linear features were a kind of optical illusion.

    But why can't I experience the optical illusion for myself?

    An interesting near-contemporary account is givenin this article in the Eleventh Edition of the Encyclopaedia Britannica [1911encyclopedia.org] "Of the reality of the better marked ones there can be no doubt, as they have been seen repeatedly by many observers, including those at the Lick Observatory, and have actually been photographed at the Lowell Observatory. The doubt is therefore confined to the vast network of lines so fine that they never certainly have been seen elsewhere than at Flagstaff. The difficulty of pronouncing upon their reality arises from the fact that we have to do mainly with objects not plainly visible (or, as Lowell contends, not plainly visible elsewhere). The question therefore becomes one of psychological optics rather than of astronomy. When the question is considered from this point of view it is found that combinations of light and shaded areas very different from continuous lines, will, under certain conditions, be interpreted by the eye as such lines; and when such is the case, long practice by an observer, however carefully conducted, may confirm him in this interpretation. "
  • by p3d0 ( 42270 ) on Wednesday September 03, 2003 @02:54PM (#6861414)
    Mars was ok, but the most impressive thing I saw was around a year ago when about four planets were all close to each other. Looking out my window, I could mentally connect them and see the ecliptic, and it really gave me a visceral sense of being on a planet travelling with other planets around the sun.
  • by MikShapi ( 681808 ) on Wednesday September 03, 2003 @03:41PM (#6861905) Journal
    Like this [www.isr.us], in less than 20 years given adequate funding.

"Experience has proved that some people indeed know everything." -- Russell Baker

Working...