Are You Man or Mouse? 72
fygment writes "... according to recent studies. It seems were more closely related to rodents than the carnivores i.e. the primates didn't evolve from the noble jungle cats, wolves, etc. Were closer to rats. Of course this has long been suspected in lawyers and SCO execs ..."
Recent? (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Recent? (Score:5, Informative)
If you look closely at the tree, you will see that the Tree of Life does indeed have order Rodentia closer to the order Primates. I recall learning this in high-school biology, also.
Yes this does seem to be a bit of old news.
Tree of life online (Score:5, Informative)
Perhaps this research will allow to make some adjustments to the tree. However, there are already interesting facts in the current version. For example, bats are closer to primates than most other mammals. On the other hand, armadillos must have branched very early, although they did it after opossums.
What about chickens? (Score:1, Informative)
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/535945.stm
summary (Score:2, Informative)
Summary: A pioneering study comparing the genes of 13 species has uncovered clues to how the vertebrate family tree might have evolved. One intriguing result is that primates, including humans, are closer to rodents than carnivores or cows and pigs. Many pieces of DNA that don't even code for proteins in all these species however are conserved, suggesting that even so-called 'junk' DNA may have an important role in biology.
Re: Uhh (Score:1, Informative)
Nah, the textbooks have too much junque in them. Get rid of the "must prove evolution even if we have to use arguments proven wrong 125 years ago" approach and maybe you'd get some respect.
Get rid of the "fossils date the rocks, but the rocks date the fossils more accurately" circular logic.
Deal with hard science, not speculation. Then textbooks and science would gain more respect.